On pe, 2016-10-07 at 10:46 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> @@ -72,21 +68,18 @@ static struct sg_table *i915_gem_map_dma_buf(struct
> dma_buf_attachment *attachme
> }
>
> if (!dma_map_sg(attachment->dev, st->sgl, st->nents, dir)) {
> - ret =-ENOMEM;
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto err_free_sg;
> }
>
> - mutex_unlock(&obj->base.dev->struct_mutex);
> return st;
>
> err_free_sg:
> sg_free_table(st);
> err_free:
> kfree(st);
> -err_unpin:
> +err_put_pages:
> i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(obj);
I do not quite follow the logic leading to rename in here.
> @@ -177,15 +155,22 @@ static int i915_gem_begin_cpu_access(struct dma_buf
> *dma_buf, enum dma_data_dire
> {
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = dma_buf_to_obj(dma_buf);
> struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev;
> - int ret;
> bool write = (direction == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL || direction ==
> DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> + int ret;
>
> - ret = i915_mutex_lock_interruptible(dev);
> + ret = i915_gem_object_pin_pages(obj);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + ret = i915_mutex_lock_interruptible(dev);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> +
> ret = i915_gem_object_set_to_cpu_domain(obj, write);
> mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> +
> +err:
combined path, 'out:'
> @@ -195,13 +180,19 @@ static int i915_gem_end_cpu_access(struct dma_buf
> *dma_buf, enum dma_data_direct
> struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev;
> int ret;
>
> - ret = i915_mutex_lock_interruptible(dev);
> + ret = i915_gem_object_pin_pages(obj);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + ret = i915_mutex_lock_interruptible(dev);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> +
> ret = i915_gem_object_set_to_gtt_domain(obj, false);
> mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>
> +err:
Ditto.
With above fixed;
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
