On 21/05/2020 10:44, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Chris Wilson (2020-05-21 10:32:49)
Quoting Chris Wilson (2020-05-21 10:27:16)
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-05-21 10:13:14)
On 21/05/2020 09:53, Chris Wilson wrote:
In order to be valid to dereference during the i915_fence_release, after
Quoting Chris Wilson (2020-05-21 10:32:49)
> Quoting Chris Wilson (2020-05-21 10:27:16)
> > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-05-21 10:13:14)
> > >
> > > On 21/05/2020 09:53, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > > In order to be valid to dereference during the i915_fence_release, after
> > > > retiring the fence
Quoting Chris Wilson (2020-05-21 10:27:16)
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-05-21 10:13:14)
> >
> > On 21/05/2020 09:53, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > In order to be valid to dereference during the i915_fence_release, after
> > > retiring the fence and releasing its refererences, we assume that
> > >
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-05-21 10:13:14)
>
> On 21/05/2020 09:53, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > In order to be valid to dereference during the i915_fence_release, after
> > retiring the fence and releasing its refererences, we assume that
> > rq->engine can only be a real engine (that stay intact
On 21/05/2020 09:53, Chris Wilson wrote:
In order to be valid to dereference during the i915_fence_release, after
retiring the fence and releasing its refererences, we assume that
rq->engine can only be a real engine (that stay intact until the device
is shutdown after all fences have been
