Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-12-23 Thread Arkadiusz Hiler
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 03:12:24PM -0800, Anusha Srivatsa wrote: > From: Peter Antoine > > This patch will allow for getparams to return the status of the HuC. > As the HuC has to be validated by the GuC this patch uses the validated > status to show when the HuC is

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-12-16 Thread Srivatsa, Anusha
gt;Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 8:31 AM >> >To: Hiler, Arkadiusz <arkadiusz.hi...@intel.com> >> >Cc: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.sriva...@intel.com>; intel- >> >g...@lists.freedesktop.org >> >Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-12-16 Thread Chris Wilson
gt; >Cc: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.sriva...@intel.com>; intel- > >g...@lists.freedesktop.org > >Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to > >getparams > > > >On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 05:21:38PM +0100, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: > >&

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-12-16 Thread Srivatsa, Anusha
bject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to >getparams > >On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 05:21:38PM +0100, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 04:12:36PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: >> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 03:43:46PM +0100, Arkadiu

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-12-16 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 05:21:38PM +0100, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 04:12:36PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 03:43:46PM +0100, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:42:53PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-12-16 Thread Arkadiusz Hiler
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 04:12:36PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 03:43:46PM +0100, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:42:53PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 02:29:50PM -0800, anushasr wrote: > > > > From: Peter Antoine

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-12-16 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 03:43:46PM +0100, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:42:53PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 02:29:50PM -0800, anushasr wrote: > > > From: Peter Antoine > > > > > > This patch will allow for getparams to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-12-16 Thread Arkadiusz Hiler
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 02:29:50PM -0800, anushasr wrote: > From: Peter Antoine > > This patch will allow for getparams to return the status of the HuC. > As the HuC has to be validated by the GuC this patch uses the validated > status to show when the HuC is loaded and

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-12-16 Thread Arkadiusz Hiler
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:42:53PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 02:29:50PM -0800, anushasr wrote: > > From: Peter Antoine > > > > This patch will allow for getparams to return the status of the HuC. > > As the HuC has to be validated by the GuC

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-12-15 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 02:29:50PM -0800, anushasr wrote: > From: Peter Antoine > > This patch will allow for getparams to return the status of the HuC. > As the HuC has to be validated by the GuC this patch uses the validated > status to show when the HuC is loaded and

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-12-13 Thread Srivatsa, Anusha
; >Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to >getparams > >On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:55:34PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 03:02:19PM -0800, anushasr wrote: >> > From: Peter Antoine <peter.anto...@intel.com&g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-12-13 Thread Arkadiusz Hiler
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:55:34PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 03:02:19PM -0800, anushasr wrote: > > From: Peter Antoine > > > > This patch will allow for getparams to return the status of the HuC. > > As the HuC has to be validated by the GuC

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-12-12 Thread Srivatsa, Anusha
ajdeczko ><michal.wajdec...@linux.intel.com> >Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to >getparams > >On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 03:52:05PM +0100, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 02:21:41PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: >> > As

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-12-12 Thread Arkadiusz Hiler
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 03:17:16PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 03:52:05PM +0100, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 02:21:41PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > As for userspace simply asking where huc is enabled, we already have > > > that in the ABI via

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-12-12 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 03:52:05PM +0100, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 02:21:41PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > > As for userspace simply asking where huc is enabled, we already have > > that in the ABI via the module parameter, so you need to justify why > > this is preferred

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-12-12 Thread Arkadiusz Hiler
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 02:21:41PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 03:13:17PM +0100, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 01:59:45PM +0100, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 03:02:19PM -0800, anushasr wrote: > > > > From: Peter Antoine

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-12-12 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 03:13:17PM +0100, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: > On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 01:59:45PM +0100, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 03:02:19PM -0800, anushasr wrote: > > > From: Peter Antoine > > > > > > This patch will allow for getparams to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-12-12 Thread Arkadiusz Hiler
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 01:59:45PM +0100, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 03:02:19PM -0800, anushasr wrote: > > From: Peter Antoine > > > > This patch will allow for getparams to return the status of the HuC. > > As the HuC has to be validated by the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-12-09 Thread Michal Wajdeczko
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 03:02:19PM -0800, anushasr wrote: > From: Peter Antoine > > This patch will allow for getparams to return the status of the HuC. > As the HuC has to be validated by the GuC this patch uses the validated > status to show when the HuC is loaded and

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-12-08 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 03:02:19PM -0800, anushasr wrote: > From: Peter Antoine > > This patch will allow for getparams to return the status of the HuC. > As the HuC has to be validated by the GuC this patch uses the validated > status to show when the HuC is loaded and

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-12-01 Thread Arkadiusz Hiler
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 03:31:34PM -0800, Anusha Srivatsa wrote: > From: Peter Antoine > > This patch will allow for getparams to return the status of the HuC. > As the HuC has to be validated by the GuC this patch uses the validated > status to show when the HuC is

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-11-23 Thread Jeff McGee
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 02:27:43PM -0800, Anusha Srivatsa wrote: > From: Peter Antoine > > This patch will allow for getparams to return the status of the HuC. > As the HuC has to be validated by the GuC this patch uses the validated > status to show when the HuC is

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-10-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 02:47:32PM -0700, Jeff McGee wrote: > On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 11:43:02AM -0700, Anusha Srivatsa wrote: > > From: Peter Antoine > > > > This patch will allow for getparams to return the status of the HuC. > > As the HuC has to be validated by the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-10-13 Thread Jeff McGee
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 11:43:02AM -0700, Anusha Srivatsa wrote: > From: Peter Antoine > > This patch will allow for getparams to return the status of the HuC. > As the HuC has to be validated by the GuC this patch uses the validated > status to show when the HuC is

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/get_params: Add HuC status to getparams

2016-10-05 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 11:43:02AM -0700, Anusha Srivatsa wrote: > From: Peter Antoine > > This patch will allow for getparams to return the status of the HuC. > As the HuC has to be validated by the GuC this patch