Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-08-15 12:51:28)
>
> On 14/08/2018 16:22, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-08-14 15:40:58)
> > Looks like we should be able to hook this up to a selftest to confirm
> > the modification does land in the target context image, and a SRM to
> > confirm
On 14/08/2018 16:22, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-08-14 15:40:58)
+static int
+i915_gem_context_reconfigure_sseu(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
+ struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+ struct intel_sseu sseu)
+{
+
On 14/08/2018 19:53, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-08-14 19:44:09)
On 14/08/2018 15:59, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-08-14 15:40:58)
From: Chris Wilson
We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice configuration for
its own use case. To do
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-08-14 19:44:09)
>
> On 14/08/2018 15:59, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-08-14 15:40:58)
> >> From: Chris Wilson
> >>
> >> We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice configuration for
> >> its own use case. To do so, we expose a
On 14/08/2018 15:59, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-08-14 15:40:58)
From: Chris Wilson
We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice configuration for
its own use case. To do so, we expose a context parameter to allow
adjustment of the RPCS register stored within
On 14/08/18 17:05, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 14/08/18 16:18, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-08-14 16:11:36)
On 14/08/18 15:59, Chris Wilson wrote:
And I'd still recommend not using indirect access if we can apply the
changes immediately.
-Chris
Hangs on Gen9 :(
How
On 14/08/18 16:18, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-08-14 16:11:36)
On 14/08/18 15:59, Chris Wilson wrote:
And I'd still recommend not using indirect access if we can apply the
changes immediately.
-Chris
Hangs on Gen9 :(
How does modifying the context image of an idle
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-08-14 15:40:58)
> +static int
> +i915_gem_context_reconfigure_sseu(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
> + struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> + struct intel_sseu sseu)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-08-14 16:11:36)
> On 14/08/18 15:59, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > And I'd still recommend not using indirect access if we can apply the
> > changes immediately.
> > -Chris
> >
>
> Hangs on Gen9 :(
How does modifying the context image of an idle (unpinned) context cause
On 14/08/18 15:59, Chris Wilson wrote:
And I'd still recommend not using indirect access if we can apply the
changes immediately.
-Chris
Hangs on Gen9 :(
-
Lionel
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-08-14 15:40:58)
> From: Chris Wilson
>
> We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice configuration for
> its own use case. To do so, we expose a context parameter to allow
> adjustment of the RPCS register stored within the context image (and
> currently
On 08/05/18 21:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-05-03 18:18:43)
On 25/04/2018 12:45, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
From: Chris Wilson
We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice configuration for
its own use case. To do so, we expose a
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-05-03 18:18:43)
>
> On 25/04/2018 12:45, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> > From: Chris Wilson
> >
> > We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice configuration for
> > its own use case. To do so, we expose a context parameter to allow
:tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 1:25 AM
To: Rogozhkin, Dmitry V <dmitry.v.rogozh...@intel.com>; Landwerlin, Lionel G
<lionel.g.landwer...@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Expose RPCS (SSEU) configurati
batch buffers?
Regards,
Tvrtko
*From:*Landwerlin, Lionel G
*Sent:* Friday, May 4, 2018 9:25 AM
*To:* Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com>;
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Rogozhkin, Dmitry V
<dmitry.v.rogozh...@intel.com>
*Subject:* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/
in, Dmitry V
<dmitry.v.rogozh...@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Expose RPCS (SSEU) configuration
to userspace
On 03/05/18 18:18, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
+int intel_lr_context_set_sseu(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
+ struct intel
On 03/05/18 18:18, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
+int intel_lr_context_set_sseu(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
+ struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+ struct i915_gem_context_sseu *sseu)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = ctx->i915;
+ struct intel_context *ce;
On 25/04/2018 12:45, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
From: Chris Wilson
We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice configuration for
its own use case. To do so, we expose a context parameter to allow
adjustment of the RPCS register stored within the context
On 03/05/2018 17:04, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-04-26 13:22:30)
On 26/04/18 11:00, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-04-25 14:45:21)
From: Chris Wilson
We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice
On 03/05/18 17:04, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-04-26 13:22:30)
On 26/04/18 11:00, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-04-25 14:45:21)
From: Chris Wilson
We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice
Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2018-05-03 17:04:31)
> More advanced tactics would include scheduling work so that we try to
> avoid the slice count changes and deduct the switching time from the
> execution budget of the app requesting less slices (if we had fair
> time slicing).
Have you been peeking
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-04-26 13:22:30)
> On 26/04/18 11:00, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-04-25 14:45:21)
> >> From: Chris Wilson
> >>
> >> We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice configuration for
> >> its own use
On 26/04/18 11:00, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-04-25 14:45:21)
From: Chris Wilson
We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice configuration for
its own use case. To do so, we expose a context parameter to allow
adjustment of the
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-04-25 14:45:21)
> From: Chris Wilson
>
> We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice configuration for
> its own use case. To do so, we expose a context parameter to allow
> adjustment of the RPCS register stored within the
24 matches
Mail list logo