Quoting Jani Nikula (2018-02-19 11:34:34)
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2018, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:57:46AM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> >> pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as
> >> where a PCI device is present. This restricts
On Fri, 16 Feb 2018, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:57:46AM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as
>> where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be
>> reused for other
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:57:46AM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as
> where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be
> reused for other domain numbers.
>
> Getting ready to remove pci_get_bus_and_slot()
On 12/12/2017 9:04 AM, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I sent this individual i915 patch to our CI, and it is passing on all
> platforms:
>
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/34822/
>
> Is it ok if I merge this to drm-tip already?
As long as you have this change in your tree, it
On Tue, 2017-12-12 at 19:07 -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 12/12/2017 9:04 AM, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I sent this individual i915 patch to our CI, and it is passing on
> > all platforms:
> >
> > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/34822/
> >
> > Is it ok if I merge this to
Hi,
I sent this individual i915 patch to our CI, and it is passing on all platforms:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/34822/
Is it ok if I merge this to drm-tip already?
Regards, Joonas
On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 13:50 -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> +dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
>
> On
On 11/28/2017 11:29 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 11/28/2017 10:30 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>> + dev_priv->bridge_dev =
>>> + pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(domain, 0, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0));
>> Maybe just pci_get_slot(pdev->bus, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0)) ?
>>
>> I guess if we want to be pedantic we could
On 11/28/2017 10:30 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> +dev_priv->bridge_dev =
>> +pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(domain, 0, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0));
> Maybe just pci_get_slot(pdev->bus, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0)) ?
>
> I guess if we want to be pedantic we could go for:
>
> bus =
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:57:46AM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as
> where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be
> reused for other domain numbers.
>
> Getting ready to remove pci_get_bus_and_slot()
+dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
On 11/27/2017 11:57 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as
> where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be
> reused for other domain numbers.
>
> Getting ready to remove
10 matches
Mail list logo