Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 4/4] tests/syncobj: Add some wait and reset tests (v5)

2017-08-10 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2017-08-10 06:35:43) > > This adds both trivial error-checking tests as well as more complex > > tests which actually test whether or not waits do what they're supposed > > to do. They only

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 4/4] tests/syncobj: Add some wait and reset tests (v5)

2017-08-10 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2017-08-10 06:35:43) > +static void > +test_single_wait(int fd, uint32_t test_flags, int expect) > +{ > + uint32_t syncobj = syncobj_create(fd); > + uint32_t flags = 0; > + int timeline; > + > + if (test_flags & WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT) > +

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 4/4] tests/syncobj: Add some wait and reset tests (v5)

2017-08-10 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2017-08-10 06:35:43) > This adds both trivial error-checking tests as well as more complex > tests which actually test whether or not waits do what they're supposed > to do. They only currently work on i915 but it should be simple to hook > them up for other drivers by

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 4/4] tests/syncobj: Add some wait and reset tests (v5)

2017-08-10 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2017-08-10 06:35:43) > +igt_main > +{ > + int fd; > + > + igt_fixture { > + fd = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_ANY); DRIVER_ANY | DRIVER_VGEM (ANY really means KMS) > + igt_require(has_syncobj_wait(fd)); > +