Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2018-04-06 17:57:20)
> On Fri, 06 Apr 2018 17:51:44 +0200, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
>
> > We will want to park GEM before disengaging the drive^W^W^W unwedging.
> > Since we already do the work for idling, expose the guts as a new
> > function that we can then reuse.
> >
> > v2: Just skip if already parked; makes it more forgiving to use by
> > future callers.
> > v3: Extract mark_busy, rename it to i915_gem_unpark and place it next to
> > i915_gem_park so that we can evaluate it for symmetry more easily.
> > Calling GEM from inside i915_request looks to be a bit of a layering
> > violation, for the moment I am imaging them as being notify_cb.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
> > Cc: Michal Wajdeczko
> > Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin
> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala
> > Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala #v1
> > ---
>
> Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko
And into the mix it goes. Thanks for the suggestions and reviews,
-Chris
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
