Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 09/26] drm/i915/slpc: If using SLPC, do not set frequency
On 9/9/2016 10:51 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 06:21:28PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote: From: Tom O'Rourke When frequency requests are made by SLPC, host driver should not attempt to make frequency requests due to potential conflicts. Host-based turbo operations are already avoided when SLPC is used. This change covers other frequency requests such as from sysfs or debugfs interfaces. A later patch in this series updates sysfs/debugfs interfaces for setting max/min frequencies with SLPC. v1: Use intel_slpc_active instead of HAS_SLPC (Paulo) Signed-off-by: Tom O'Rourke Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c index db5c4ef..d187066 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c @@ -5047,6 +5047,9 @@ void gen6_rps_boost(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, void intel_set_rps(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 val) { + if (intel_slpc_active(dev_priv)) + return; active not enabled? All of the other checks in rps are enabled, right? -Chris Will change this to make consistent. ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 09/26] drm/i915/slpc: If using SLPC, do not set frequency
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 06:21:28PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote: > From: Tom O'Rourke > > When frequency requests are made by SLPC, host driver > should not attempt to make frequency requests due to > potential conflicts. > > Host-based turbo operations are already avoided when > SLPC is used. This change covers other frequency > requests such as from sysfs or debugfs interfaces. > > A later patch in this series updates sysfs/debugfs > interfaces for setting max/min frequencies with SLPC. > > v1: Use intel_slpc_active instead of HAS_SLPC (Paulo) > > Signed-off-by: Tom O'Rourke > Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > index db5c4ef..d187066 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > @@ -5047,6 +5047,9 @@ void gen6_rps_boost(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > void intel_set_rps(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 val) > { > + if (intel_slpc_active(dev_priv)) > + return; active not enabled? All of the other checks in rps are enabled, right? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx