Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2023-11-30 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 04:58:48PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Hi Dave & Sima - > > i915 fixes for v6.7-rc4. > > drm-intel-fixes-2023-11-30: > drm/i915 fixes for v6.7-rc4: > - Mark internal GSC engine with reserved uabi class > - Take VGA converters into account in eDP probe > - Fix intel_pre_

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2023-05-25 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 25 May 2023, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > Hi Dave & Daniel, > > Here goes drm-intel-fixes for v4.6-rc4. You're seven years late for that one. ;D J. > > Again just one fix, for pipejoiner config pipe disabling. > > Regards, Joonas > > *** > > drm-intel-fixes-2023-05-25: > > PIPEDMC disabling

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2023-04-13 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 10:13:57AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Hi Dave & Daniel - > > One DSI fix, stable material. > > drm-intel-fixes-2023-04-13: > drm/i915 fixes for v6.3-rc7: > - Fix dual link DSI for TGL+ > > BR, > Jani. > > The following changes since commit 09a9639e56c01c7a00d6c0ca63f

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2023-04-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 12:04:04PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Hi Dave & Daniel - > > drm-intel-fixes-2023-04-05: > drm/i915 fixes for v6.3-rc6: > - Fix DP MST DSC M/N calculation to use compressed bpp > - Fix racy use-after-free in perf ioctl > - Fix context runtime accounting > - Fix handling

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2023-03-30 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 02:30:29PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Hi Dave & Daniel - > > drm-intel-fixes-2023-03-30: > drm/i915 fixes for v6.3-rc5: > - Fix PMU support by reusing functions with sysfs > - Fix a number of issues related to color, PSR and arm/noarm > - Fix state check related to ICL

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2023-03-24 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 12:46:27PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Hi Dave & Daniel - > > Otherwise a fairly regular fixes pull, except for two things: > > First, I have not gotten CI results on this. I don't know what gives. > > Second, I missed adding the hwmon revert to the tag. I accidentally

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2023-01-06 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 03:02:20PM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > Hi Dave and Daniel, > > Only GVT related fixes for this round. > > I have another fix queued for i915_vma_unbind_async from Nirmoy that will > target stable 5.18, but I figured it out late so I didn't run CI on that yet. > So I'm hol

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2023-01-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 04:59:38AM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > Hi Dave and Daniel, > > Here goes the initial fixes for 6.2. > > The most critical ones seems to be the evict fix from Matt and > the MIPI DSI from Jani. Both targeting stable trees. > > I'm sorry for sending this on a Friday and no

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2022-09-12 Thread Vivi, Rodrigo
On Sun, 2022-09-11 at 19:22 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Hi Rodrigo, > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 09:59:54AM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > Hi Dave and Daniel, > > > > A few fixes, but most targeting stable. > > > > [...] > > > > Ville Syrjälä (2): > >   drm/i915: Implement WaEdpLinkRa

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2021-10-28 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 28 Oct 2021, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 01:29:21PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> >> Hi Dave & Daniel - >> >> Certainly more than I'd like at this stage, but it's mostly Cc: stable >> material, and the tracepoint change is a last minute revert to dodge a >> potential "t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2021-10-28 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 01:29:21PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Hi Dave & Daniel - > > Certainly more than I'd like at this stage, but it's mostly Cc: stable > material, and the tracepoint change is a last minute revert to dodge a > potential "tracepoints are uabi" bullet before it hits the fina

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2021-10-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 11:50:20AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Hi Dave & Daniel - > > drm-intel-fixes-2021-09-30: > drm/i915 fixes for v5.15-rc4: > - Fix GVT scheduler ww lock usage > - Fix pdfdocs documentation build > - Fix request early tracepoints > - Fix an invalid warning from rps worker

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2021-04-15 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 08:59:11AM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > Hi Dave and Daniel, > > Here goes drm-intel-fixes-2021-04-15: > > Display panel & power related fixes: > > - Backlight fix (Lyude) > - Display watermark fix (Ville) > - VLV panel power fix (Hans) > > Thanks, > Rodrigo. > > The fol

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2021-03-11 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 11:36:51AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 21:28, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > > Hi Dave and Daniel, > > > > Things are very quiet. Only 1 fix this round. > > Since I will be out next week, if this trend continues I will > > accumulate 2 weeks and send when

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2021-03-11 Thread Dave Airlie
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 21:28, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > Hi Dave and Daniel, > > Things are very quiet. Only 1 fix this round. > Since I will be out next week, if this trend continues I will > accumulate 2 weeks and send when in -rc4. > > Here goes drm-intel-fixes-2021-03-11: > > - Wedge the GPU if c

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2021-01-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 09:50:28AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Hi Dave & Daniel - > > Pretty quiet still, but here's some cc: stable fixes. Pulled, thanks. -Daniel > > (Well, one doesn't have the explicit stable tag, but the Fixes tag > points at a commit in v3.9...) > > drm-intel-fixes-202

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes v2

2020-12-09 Thread Vivi, Rodrigo
On Wed, 2020-12-09 at 14:11 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 05:47:05AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > Hi Dave and Daniel, > > > > Please ignore the pull request I had sent yesterday and use only > > this one. > > > > I had missed one patch: 14d1eaf08845 ("drm/i915/gt: Protec

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes v2

2020-12-09 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 05:47:05AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > Hi Dave and Daniel, > > Please ignore the pull request I had sent yesterday and use only this one. > > I had missed one patch: 14d1eaf08845 ("drm/i915/gt: Protect context lifetime > with RCU"). > > Also, please notice that the comm

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2020-12-02 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 04:36:24PM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > Hi Dave and Daniel, > > Fixes for GPU hang, null dereference, suspend-resume, power consumption, and > use-after-free. > > The commit 6db58901c2aa ("drm/i915/display: return earlier from > intel_modeset_init() without display") was

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2020-11-12 Thread Vivi, Rodrigo
> On Nov 12, 2020, at 4:32 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 09:08, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: >> >> Hi Dave and Daniel, >> >> This is the same set as last week + couple new fixes targeting stable. >> > > But I merged last weeks set and it's in rc3, maybe you can generate > the p

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2020-11-12 Thread Dave Airlie
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 09:08, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > Hi Dave and Daniel, > > This is the same set as last week + couple new fixes targeting stable. > But I merged last weeks set and it's in rc3, maybe you can generate the pull request relative to origin/master or drm/drm-fixes because I'm not su

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2020-01-09 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2020-01-09 15:34:58) > Hi Dave & Daniel, > > Happy New Year, now back from the holiday break. > > A bunch of important fixes. Further fixes for the power/perf > regressions caused by the past security fixes. Then fix for > user reported GPU hang regression. Revert to avoi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2019-12-23 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2019-12-19 12:46:35) > Hi Dave & Daniel, > > Another -rc, another CI fire due to regressions elsewhere. > > Our CI needed the following patches to get machines boot with -rc2: > > Revert "devtmpfs: use do_mount() instead of ksys_mount()" > (commit 5e787db

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2019-10-03 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 10:37:11PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 12:30:51PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > Hi Dave and Daniel, > > > > This v2 contains a critical DP-MST fix that it would be really good to be > > propagated as soon as possible. > > > > Besides all the drm-

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2019-10-03 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 12:30:51PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > Hi Dave and Daniel, > > This v2 contains a critical DP-MST fix that it would be really good to be > propagated as soon as possible. > > Besides all the drm-intel-next-fixes that I mentioned on previous email. > > Here goes drm-intel

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2019-10-03 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 10:58:52AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > Hi Dave and Daniel, > > I know you are on XDC and I was even considering not send any this week, > but let me send this before I forget. > > There are the drm-intel-next-fixes pull requests that I had sent > that are still needed and

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2019-08-15 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 9:42 AM Jani Nikula wrote: > > > Hi Dave & Daniel - > > One use after free fix for GVT. > > It doesn't have a Link: tag because dim doesn't check that while > applying the pull, and, for some reason, it was also not checked when I > pushed out the branch. Possibly because i

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2019-08-02 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
Hi, > I apologize for not having fixes for a couple of weeks, and then showing > up late with a bunch of them. I saw Dave make the fixes pull to Linus > for -rc3 already, but I must humbly ask you to accommodate an extra > fixes pull. If there is an extra -rc3 fixes pull anyway it would be nice

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2019-06-13 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:32:39PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Hi Dave, Daniel, on behalf of Joonas, > > drm-intel-fixes-2019-06-13: > drm/i915 fixes for v5.2-rc5: > - Fix DMC firmware input validation to avoid buffer overflow > - Fix perf register access whitelist for userspace > - Fix DSI pan

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2019-03-28 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, Jani Nikula wrote: > Hi Dave and Daniel, a fairly normal fixes pull. > > drm-intel-fixes-2019-03-28: > drm/i915 fixes for v5.2-rc3: > - fix mmap range checks > - fix gvt ppgtt mm LRU list access races > - fix selftest error pointer check > - fix a macro definition (pre-emptive

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2019-01-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 11:18:22AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Hi Dave & Daniel - > > drm-intel-fixes-2019-01-11: > i915 fixes for v5.0-rc2: > - Disable PSR for Apple panels > - Broxton ERR_PTR error state fix > - Kabylake VECS workaround fix > - Unwind failure on pinning the gen7 ppgtt > - GVT

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2017-09-20 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Dave Airlie wrote: > On 20 September 2017 at 15:43, Dave Airlie wrote: >> On 20 September 2017 at 09:03, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: >>> Hi Dave, >> >> Hi Rodrigo, >> >> This pull request is generated wrongly, it contains some commits from >> drm-next in it. > > Sorry contains some

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2017-09-19 Thread Dave Airlie
On 20 September 2017 at 15:43, Dave Airlie wrote: > On 20 September 2017 at 09:03, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: >> Hi Dave, > > Hi Rodrigo, > > This pull request is generated wrongly, it contains some commits from > drm-next in it. Sorry contains some commits from drm-fixes in it. > > Please regenerate i

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2017-09-19 Thread Dave Airlie
On 20 September 2017 at 09:03, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > Hi Dave, Hi Rodrigo, This pull request is generated wrongly, it contains some commits from drm-next in it. Please regenerate it, I'm assuming you generated against 4.14-rc1 and not against drm-next. Dave.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2017-04-12 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 04:08:15PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > > Hi Dave, I've had most of these ready for more than a week now, but > > there was no use sending them as you were away. Fixes all around, except > > not so much display stuf

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2017-04-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Hi Dave, I've had most of these ready for more than a week now, but > there was no use sending them as you were away. Fixes all around, except > not so much display stuff this time. Hopefully winding down for this > cycle now. The rcu fix fr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2017-01-05 Thread Dave Airlie
On 6 January 2017 at 04:29, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 3:19 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: >> >> Hi Dave, or Linus if Dave's on vacation, I'm a bit unsure, > > I'm going to ignore this on the assumption that Dave is around. But if > nothing happens for a few days, ping me again and I'

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2017-01-05 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 3:19 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Hi Dave, or Linus if Dave's on vacation, I'm a bit unsure, I'm going to ignore this on the assumption that Dave is around. But if nothing happens for a few days, ping me again and I'll pull it directly. Ok? Linus __

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2016-01-03 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Jan 3, 2016 18:06, "Dave Airlie" wrote: > > can you pull this directly, baby has arrived, but I'm not back at work yet. Assumed so, and already did. It's in rc8, Linus ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.free

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2016-01-03 Thread Dave Airlie
On 2 January 2016 at 23:56, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Hi Dave, Linus - Hi Linus, can you pull this directly, baby has arrived, but I'm not back at work yet. Dave. > > Two display fixes still for v4.4. > > The new year's resolution is to start using signed tags per Linus' > request. This one is st

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2015-12-23 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel tags/drm-intel-fixes-2015-12-23 Btw, since you're already using tags, mind using *signed* tags instead? It's just good housekeeping.. Linus _

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2015-12-23 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Hi Dave (and/or Linus, depending on the new arrival and eggnog > schedules) - I'll pull it directly. Dave just sent me his pending drm fixes, he may or may not be around any more, it's already christmas eve down under. Linus ___

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2015-07-31 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> >> I delayed my -fixes pull a bit hoping that I could include a fix for the >> dp mst stuff but looks a bit more nasty than that. So just 3 other >> regression fixes, one 4.2 other tw

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2015-07-31 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > I delayed my -fixes pull a bit hoping that I could include a fix for the > dp mst stuff but looks a bit more nasty than that. So just 3 other > regression fixes, one 4.2 other two cc: stable. Quick question: you can now reproduce the mst p

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2014-08-17 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Fri, 8 Aug 2014, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Big fix is the duct-tape for ring init on g4x platforms, we seem to have > found the magic again to make those machines as happy as before (not > perfect though unfortunately, but that was never the case). I unfortunately don't agree with the last part;

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2014-08-09 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Linus Torvalds > wrote: >> >> Got this while bisecting. I'm not sure it's related > > It's not. Iirc it was an intermediate merge issue between two patch series. If you still see this on your tip, please scr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2014-08-08 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Got this while bisecting. I'm not sure it's related It's not. The actual bug was panel self refresh. It's still broken, and doesn't work. So enabling it by default was a big mistake (commit b6d547791fd3: "drm/i915: Enable PSR by default."

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2014-08-08 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > This is a Sony Vaio Pro 11, so it's bog-standard intel graphics (Haswell ULT). Got this while bisecting. I'm not sure it's related, the behavior was a bit different from the other cases. So I'll try to continue bisecting, but am a bit wor

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2014-08-08 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > The problem seems to exist already with just the plain drm pull from > Dave. I thought I had tested that, but apparently not. Still busy bisecting (and it's going into the i915 part of Dave's drm pull, so the bisect looks sane so far), bu

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2014-08-08 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> >> git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel tags/drm-intel-fixes-2014-08-08 > > Hmm. My laptop no longer resumes properly. The problem seems to exist already with just the plain drm

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2014-08-08 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel tags/drm-intel-fixes-2014-08-08 Hmm. My laptop no longer resumes properly. Or rather, I suspect it resumes, but the screen is black. I will bisect, and I *will* revert if I find the offending comm

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2014-06-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 02:09:41PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Hi Dave - > > First round of fixes for 3.16-rc, mostly cc: stable, and the vt/vgacon > fixes from Daniel [1] to avoid hangs and unclaimed register errors on > module load/reload. Aside: The vt/vgacon stuff also seems to fix some ra

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2014-06-06 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 08:38:36AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Bunch of stuff for 3.16 still: > - Mipi dsi panel support for byt. Finally! From Shobhit&others. I've > squeezed this in since it's a regression compared to vbios and we've > been ridiculed about it a bit too often .

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2014-04-25 Thread Jani Nikula
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, Jani Nikula wrote: >> Daniel Vetter (3): >> drm/i915: Sanitize the enable_ppgtt module option once > > Aww crap, our QA spotted a show stopper bug in this one, and I missed > the bug report [1]. My bad, although I can't disagree

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2014-04-25 Thread Jani Nikula
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, Jani Nikula wrote: > Daniel Vetter (3): > drm/i915: Sanitize the enable_ppgtt module option once Aww crap, our QA spotted a show stopper bug in this one, and I missed the bug report [1]. My bad, although I can't disagree with Chris' assessment in comment #1 of the bug.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2014-03-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 05 Mar 2014, Dave Airlie wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: >>> >>> Hi Dave - >>> >>> Small fixes all around, mostly stable material. Please pull. >>> >>> BR, >>> Jani. >>> >>> >>> The following changes since

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2014-03-05 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: >> >> Hi Dave - >> >> Small fixes all around, mostly stable material. Please pull. >> >> BR, >> Jani. >> >> >> The following changes since commit 0414855fdc4a40da05221fc6062cccbc0c30f169: >> >> Linux 3

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2014-03-04 Thread Dave Airlie
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Hi Dave - > > Small fixes all around, mostly stable material. Please pull. > > BR, > Jani. > > > The following changes since commit 0414855fdc4a40da05221fc6062cccbc0c30f169: > > Linux 3.14-rc5 (2014-03-02 18:56:16 -0800) > > are available i

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2014-02-11 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Aside: Next two weeks I'll be on vacation, so Jani will take over for a > bit. Thanks to the new git repo nothing really should change but a > different guy sending you pull requests. I'll also be on vacation Feb 17-21. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Int

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2013-10-29 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:29:29AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 08:49:45AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > > > Please do _not_ pull this. The pipe bpp readout stuff this crucially > > relies on is only partially backported from -next to -fixes and apparently >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2013-10-29 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 08:49:45AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Please do _not_ pull this. The pipe bpp readout stuff this crucially > relies on is only partially backported from -next to -fixes and apparently > missing bits on Haswell. Ok, updated pull request. I wanted to wait a b

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2013-10-28 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi Dave, Please do _not_ pull this. The pipe bpp readout stuff this crucially relies on is only partially backported from -next to -fixes and apparently missing bits on Haswell. Thanks, Daniel On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 12:50:12PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Just the edp bpp fix fro

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2013-09-06 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 09:49:06AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Blergh, forgotten to cc: mailing lists ... And then Ville pointed out on irc that I'm actually missing the vgacon->fbcon takeover fix. Fail friday it seems, new pull request below. -Daniel The following changes since commit f33bca

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2013-09-06 Thread Daniel Vetter
Blergh, forgotten to cc: mailing lists ... -Daniel On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Already a decent pile of fixes and a few stragglers for the merge window. > Nothing in here though to appease Linus :( > - Early stolen mem reservation from Jesse in x86 boot cod

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2013-08-23 Thread Daniel Vetter
Argh, forgotten to cc lists! On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:42:37AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Just one patch that soaked for quite a bit to fix a resume issue, > resulting in gpu hangs (or worse) due to tlb containing garbage. > > Cheers, Daniel > > > The following changes since c

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2013-07-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
Cc lists this time around ... -Daniel On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi Dave, > > One feature latecomer, I've forgotten to merge the patch to reeanble the > Haswell power well feature now that the audio interaction is fixed up. > Since that was the only unfixed issue with

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2013-05-28 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 02:03:09PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi Dave, > > A few fixes, nothing shocking: > - More Haswell pci ids. Includes a pile of marketing spare ids (which > despite the spare moniker show up all over the place). > - Fix a regression in handling modeset failures, resulti

Re: [Intel-gfx] [pull] drm-intel-fixes

2013-05-22 Thread Stéphane Marchesin
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Stéphane Marchesin > wrote: >> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Stéphane Marchesin >>> wrote: On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Daniel Vetter

Re: [Intel-gfx] [pull] drm-intel-fixes

2013-05-22 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Stéphane Marchesin wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Stéphane Marchesin >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: Hi Dave, You're pull just reminded me th

Re: [Intel-gfx] [pull] drm-intel-fixes

2013-05-22 Thread Stéphane Marchesin
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Stéphane Marchesin > wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> Hi Dave, >>> >>> You're pull just reminded me that I've been sitting on a few small -fixes, >>> too. Nothing really

Re: [Intel-gfx] [pull] drm-intel-fixes

2013-05-22 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Stéphane Marchesin wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> Hi Dave, >> >> You're pull just reminded me that I've been sitting on a few small -fixes, >> too. Nothing really major at all: >> - fixup edp setup sequence (Dave) >> - disable s

Re: [Intel-gfx] [pull] drm-intel-fixes

2013-05-21 Thread Stéphane Marchesin
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi Dave, > > You're pull just reminded me that I've been sitting on a few small -fixes, > too. Nothing really major at all: > - fixup edp setup sequence (Dave) > - disable sdvo hotplug for real, this is a fixup for a messed-up > regression

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2013-05-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 08:11:25PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi Dave, > > A few intel fixes for smaller issues and one revert for an sdv hack which > we've wanted to kill anyway. Plus two drm patches included for your > convenience, both regression fixers for mine own screw-ups. I've smashed

Re: [Intel-gfx] [pull] drm-intel-fixes

2012-10-19 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi Dave, Two more fixes from Chris on top, updated overview below On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:56:44PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > The big thing is the disabling of the hsw support by default, cc: stable. > We've aimed for basic hsw support in 3.6, but due to a few bad > happenstances we've screw

Re: [Intel-gfx] [pull] drm-intel-fixes

2012-10-04 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 03:21:47PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi Dave, > > One more, as discussed on irc. > > Bigger -fixes pile, mostly because I've included Ajax' DP dongle stuff, > as discussed on irc. Otherwise just small things: > - regression fix to finally make 6bpc auto-dither on dp wo

Re: [Intel-gfx] [pull] drm-intel-fixes

2012-10-04 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi Dave, One more, as discussed on irc. Bigger -fixes pile, mostly because I've included Ajax' DP dongle stuff, as discussed on irc. Otherwise just small things: - regression fix to finally make 6bpc auto-dither on dp work (Jani) - reinstate an snb ctx w/a that accidentally got lost in a rework (

Re: [Intel-gfx] [pull] drm-intel-fixes

2012-09-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 09:34:36PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 09:28:17AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > > > You're pull just reminded me that I've been sitting on a few small -fixes, > > too. Nothing really major at all: > > - fixup edp setup sequence (Dave

Re: [Intel-gfx] [pull] drm-intel-fixes

2012-09-10 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 09:28:17AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi Dave, > > You're pull just reminded me that I've been sitting on a few small -fixes, > too. Nothing really major at all: > - fixup edp setup sequence (Dave) > - disable sdvo hotplug for real, this is a fixup for a messed-up > re

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2012-08-29 Thread Daniel Vetter
Per usual, I've forgotten all the cc's ... I really need to script this, I'm too dumb to remember. -Daniel On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:29:43AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Just a few smaller things: > - Fix up a pipe vs. plane confusion from a refactoring, fixes a regression > from

Re: [Intel-gfx] [pull] drm-intel-fixes

2012-08-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 02:08:18PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi Dave, > > - Regression fixer for an OOPS at boot when i915.ko is built-in and > CONFIG_PM=n, introduce in 3.5 (patch from Hunt Xu) > - Regression fixer for occlusion query failures, the required w/a wasn't > applied in all cas

Re: [Intel-gfx] [pull] drm-intel-fixes

2012-08-07 Thread Ben Widawsky
On 2012-08-07 05:08, Daniel Vetter wrote: Hi Dave, - Regression fixer for an OOPS at boot when i915.ko is built-in and CONFIG_PM=n, introduce in 3.5 (patch from Hunt Xu) - Regression fixer for occlusion query failures, the required w/a wasn't applied in all cases (thanks to Eric for tracki

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes for 3.6

2012-07-25 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:17:33AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi Dave, > > First pile of fixes for 3.6 already, and I'm afraid it's a bit larger than > what I'd wish for. But I've moved all the feature-y stuff to -next, so > this really is all -fixes. Most of it is handling fallout from the hw

Re: [Intel-gfx] [pull] drm-intel-fixes

2012-06-16 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 02:16:29PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > why the previous thing blew up for Linus and why this one shouldn't, so > > I think we can risk this ;-) > > yeah no, you get one go at that, I'm no more detection fixed in -fixes > ever again, unless they are a pure revert.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2012-06-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
Meh, I've forgotten to cc the appropriate set of lists. -Daniel On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi Dave > > A few fixes for 3.5. Most of them make corner-cases a bit more robust > (hotplug for b0rked kvm switches, driver init/reset/resume), almost all of > them are cc stabl

Re: [Intel-gfx] [pull] drm-intel-fixes for 3.5

2012-05-25 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:56:24PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi Dave, > > A set of fixes for 3.5: > - Fixes for regressions in 3.5: fix spurious gmbus NAK, fix module unload, > fix pch pll asserts. > - Fix up eDP panel power sequencing - turns out we need to keep vdd on > while switching e

Re: [Intel-gfx] [pull] drm-intel-fixes for 3.4

2012-04-26 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 05:35:01PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Nothing major here and imo can wait a bit if you don't have anything > important in drm-fixes yet: > - VGA load-detect fix. This bug seems to be as old as the load-detect code > (2.6.30), but needs stupid userspace (up