Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [CI,1/5] drm/i915/psr: Add bits per pixel limitation
On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 11:47 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Dec 2019, "Souza, Jose" wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-11-29 at 08:22 +, Patchwork wrote:
> > > == Series Details ==
> > >
> > > Series: series starting with [CI,1/5] drm/i915/psr: Add bits per
> > > pixel limitation
> > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/70133/
> > > State : failure
> > >
> > > == Summary ==
> > >
> > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7434_full ->
> > > Patchwork_15480_full
> > >
> > >
> > > Summary
> > > ---
> > >
> > > **FAILURE**
> > >
> > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_15480_full
> > > absolutely
> > > need to be
> > > verified manually.
> > >
> > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the
> > > changes
> > > introduced in Patchwork_15480_full, please notify your bug team
> > > to
> > > allow them
> > > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false
> > > positives in CI.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Possible new issues
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> > > Patchwork_15480_full:
> > >
> > > ### IGT changes ###
> > >
> > > Possible regressions
> > >
> > > * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@vecs0-mixed-process:
> > > - shard-tglb: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2]
> > >[1]:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7434/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_ctx_persiste...@vecs0-mixed-process.html
> > >[2]:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-tglb3/igt@gem_ctx_persiste...@vecs0-mixed-process.html
> > >
> > > * igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-xrgb2101010-render-ytiled:
> > > - shard-tglb: [PASS][3] -> [INCOMPLETE][4]
> > >[3]:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7434/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_draw_...@draw-method-xrgb2101010-render-ytiled.html
> > >[4]:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-tglb3/igt@kms_draw_...@draw-method-xrgb2101010-render-ytiled.html
> > >
> > > * igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-xrgb-blt-untiled:
> > > - shard-skl: [PASS][5] -> [INCOMPLETE][6] +1 similar
> > > issue
> > >[5]:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7434/shard-skl9/igt@kms_draw_...@draw-method-xrgb-blt-untiled.html
> > >[6]:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-skl9/igt@kms_draw_...@draw-method-xrgb-blt-untiled.html
> >
> > Those are not related this changes so pushed to dinq.
> >
> > Thanks for the reviews Matt and Lucas.
>
> Do *not* push patches when there's open and unresolved review:
>
> 8736e8m5uj.fsf@intel.com">http://mid.mail-archive.com/8736e8m5uj.fsf@intel.com
>
>
Sorry about that, I saw your comments after I had already pushed(the
v4/CI version was on top of my mailbox while your comments were on v3),
will send a patch fixing your comments on top.
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
> > >
> > > Suppressed
> > >
> > > The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or
> > > statuses.
> > > They do not affect the overall result.
> > >
> > > * {igt@gem_exec_balancer@bonded-chain}:
> > > - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][7]
> > >[7]:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-tglb4/igt@gem_exec_balan...@bonded-chain.html
> > >
> > >
> > > Known issues
> > >
> > >
> > > Here are the changes found in Patchwork_15480_full that come
> > > from
> > > known issues:
> > >
> > > ### IGT changes ###
> > >
> > > Issues hit
> > >
> > > * igt@gem_busy@busy-vcs1:
> > > - shard-iclb: [PASS][8] -> [SKIP][9] ([fdo#112080])
> > > +9
> > > similar issues
> > >[8]:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7434/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_b...@busy-vcs1.html
> > >[9]:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_b...@busy-vcs1.html
> > >
> > > * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@bcs0-s3:
> > > - shard-tglb: [PASS][10] -> [INCOMPLETE][11]
> > > ([fdo#111832])
> > >[10]:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7434/shard-tglb9/igt@gem_ctx_isolat...@bcs0-s3.html
> > >[11]:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_ctx_isolat...@bcs0-s3.html
> > >
> > > * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-none:
> > > - shard-iclb: [PASS][12] -> [SKIP][13] ([fdo#109276]
> > > /
> > > [fdo#112080]) +2 similar issues
> > >[12]:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7434/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_ctx_isolat...@vcs1-none.html
> > >[13]:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_ctx_isolat...@vcs1-none.html
> > >
> > > * igt@gem_ctx_switch@queue-light:
> > > - shard-tglb: [PASS][14] -> [INCOMPLETE][15]
> > > ([fdo#111672])
> > >[14]:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01
Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [CI,1/5] drm/i915/psr: Add bits per pixel limitation
On Mon, 02 Dec 2019, "Souza, Jose" wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-11-29 at 08:22 +, Patchwork wrote:
>> == Series Details ==
>>
>> Series: series starting with [CI,1/5] drm/i915/psr: Add bits per
>> pixel limitation
>> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/70133/
>> State : failure
>>
>> == Summary ==
>>
>> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7434_full -> Patchwork_15480_full
>>
>>
>> Summary
>> ---
>>
>> **FAILURE**
>>
>> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_15480_full absolutely
>> need to be
>> verified manually.
>>
>> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the
>> changes
>> introduced in Patchwork_15480_full, please notify your bug team to
>> allow them
>> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false
>> positives in CI.
>>
>>
>>
>> Possible new issues
>> ---
>>
>> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
>> Patchwork_15480_full:
>>
>> ### IGT changes ###
>>
>> Possible regressions
>>
>> * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@vecs0-mixed-process:
>> - shard-tglb: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2]
>>[1]:
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7434/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_ctx_persiste...@vecs0-mixed-process.html
>>[2]:
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-tglb3/igt@gem_ctx_persiste...@vecs0-mixed-process.html
>>
>> * igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-xrgb2101010-render-ytiled:
>> - shard-tglb: [PASS][3] -> [INCOMPLETE][4]
>>[3]:
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7434/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_draw_...@draw-method-xrgb2101010-render-ytiled.html
>>[4]:
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-tglb3/igt@kms_draw_...@draw-method-xrgb2101010-render-ytiled.html
>>
>> * igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-xrgb-blt-untiled:
>> - shard-skl: [PASS][5] -> [INCOMPLETE][6] +1 similar
>> issue
>>[5]:
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7434/shard-skl9/igt@kms_draw_...@draw-method-xrgb-blt-untiled.html
>>[6]:
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-skl9/igt@kms_draw_...@draw-method-xrgb-blt-untiled.html
>
>
> Those are not related this changes so pushed to dinq.
>
> Thanks for the reviews Matt and Lucas.
Do *not* push patches when there's open and unresolved review:
8736e8m5uj.fsf@intel.com">http://mid.mail-archive.com/8736e8m5uj.fsf@intel.com
BR,
Jani.
>
>>
>>
>> Suppressed
>>
>> The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or
>> statuses.
>> They do not affect the overall result.
>>
>> * {igt@gem_exec_balancer@bonded-chain}:
>> - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][7]
>>[7]:
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-tglb4/igt@gem_exec_balan...@bonded-chain.html
>>
>>
>> Known issues
>>
>>
>> Here are the changes found in Patchwork_15480_full that come from
>> known issues:
>>
>> ### IGT changes ###
>>
>> Issues hit
>>
>> * igt@gem_busy@busy-vcs1:
>> - shard-iclb: [PASS][8] -> [SKIP][9] ([fdo#112080]) +9
>> similar issues
>>[8]:
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7434/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_b...@busy-vcs1.html
>>[9]:
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_b...@busy-vcs1.html
>>
>> * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@bcs0-s3:
>> - shard-tglb: [PASS][10] -> [INCOMPLETE][11]
>> ([fdo#111832])
>>[10]:
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7434/shard-tglb9/igt@gem_ctx_isolat...@bcs0-s3.html
>>[11]:
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_ctx_isolat...@bcs0-s3.html
>>
>> * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-none:
>> - shard-iclb: [PASS][12] -> [SKIP][13] ([fdo#109276] /
>> [fdo#112080]) +2 similar issues
>>[12]:
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7434/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_ctx_isolat...@vcs1-none.html
>>[13]:
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_ctx_isolat...@vcs1-none.html
>>
>> * igt@gem_ctx_switch@queue-light:
>> - shard-tglb: [PASS][14] -> [INCOMPLETE][15]
>> ([fdo#111672])
>>[14]:
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7434/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_ctx_swi...@queue-light.html
>>[15]:
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-tglb3/igt@gem_ctx_swi...@queue-light.html
>>
>> * igt@gem_eio@suspend:
>> - shard-tglb: [PASS][16] -> [INCOMPLETE][17]
>> ([fdo#111850])
>>[16]:
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7434/shard-tglb2/igt@gem_...@suspend.html
>>[17]:
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-tglb7/igt@gem_...@suspend.html
>>
>> * igt@gem_exec_parallel@vcs0:
>> - shard-tglb: [PASS][18] -> [INCOMPLETE][19]
>> ([fdo#111593])
>>
Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [CI,1/5] drm/i915/psr: Add bits per pixel limitation
On Fri, 2019-11-29 at 08:22 +, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: series starting with [CI,1/5] drm/i915/psr: Add bits per
> pixel limitation
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/70133/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7434_full -> Patchwork_15480_full
>
>
> Summary
> ---
>
> **FAILURE**
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_15480_full absolutely
> need to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the
> changes
> introduced in Patchwork_15480_full, please notify your bug team to
> allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false
> positives in CI.
>
>
>
> Possible new issues
> ---
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> Patchwork_15480_full:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> Possible regressions
>
> * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@vecs0-mixed-process:
> - shard-tglb: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2]
>[1]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7434/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_ctx_persiste...@vecs0-mixed-process.html
>[2]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-tglb3/igt@gem_ctx_persiste...@vecs0-mixed-process.html
>
> * igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-xrgb2101010-render-ytiled:
> - shard-tglb: [PASS][3] -> [INCOMPLETE][4]
>[3]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7434/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_draw_...@draw-method-xrgb2101010-render-ytiled.html
>[4]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-tglb3/igt@kms_draw_...@draw-method-xrgb2101010-render-ytiled.html
>
> * igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-xrgb-blt-untiled:
> - shard-skl: [PASS][5] -> [INCOMPLETE][6] +1 similar
> issue
>[5]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7434/shard-skl9/igt@kms_draw_...@draw-method-xrgb-blt-untiled.html
>[6]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-skl9/igt@kms_draw_...@draw-method-xrgb-blt-untiled.html
Those are not related this changes so pushed to dinq.
Thanks for the reviews Matt and Lucas.
>
>
> Suppressed
>
> The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or
> statuses.
> They do not affect the overall result.
>
> * {igt@gem_exec_balancer@bonded-chain}:
> - shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][7]
>[7]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-tglb4/igt@gem_exec_balan...@bonded-chain.html
>
>
> Known issues
>
>
> Here are the changes found in Patchwork_15480_full that come from
> known issues:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> Issues hit
>
> * igt@gem_busy@busy-vcs1:
> - shard-iclb: [PASS][8] -> [SKIP][9] ([fdo#112080]) +9
> similar issues
>[8]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7434/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_b...@busy-vcs1.html
>[9]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_b...@busy-vcs1.html
>
> * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@bcs0-s3:
> - shard-tglb: [PASS][10] -> [INCOMPLETE][11]
> ([fdo#111832])
>[10]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7434/shard-tglb9/igt@gem_ctx_isolat...@bcs0-s3.html
>[11]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_ctx_isolat...@bcs0-s3.html
>
> * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-none:
> - shard-iclb: [PASS][12] -> [SKIP][13] ([fdo#109276] /
> [fdo#112080]) +2 similar issues
>[12]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7434/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_ctx_isolat...@vcs1-none.html
>[13]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_ctx_isolat...@vcs1-none.html
>
> * igt@gem_ctx_switch@queue-light:
> - shard-tglb: [PASS][14] -> [INCOMPLETE][15]
> ([fdo#111672])
>[14]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7434/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_ctx_swi...@queue-light.html
>[15]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-tglb3/igt@gem_ctx_swi...@queue-light.html
>
> * igt@gem_eio@suspend:
> - shard-tglb: [PASS][16] -> [INCOMPLETE][17]
> ([fdo#111850])
>[16]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7434/shard-tglb2/igt@gem_...@suspend.html
>[17]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-tglb7/igt@gem_...@suspend.html
>
> * igt@gem_exec_parallel@vcs0:
> - shard-tglb: [PASS][18] -> [INCOMPLETE][19]
> ([fdo#111593])
>[18]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7434/shard-tglb7/igt@gem_exec_paral...@vcs0.html
>[19]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15480/shard-tglb4/igt@gem_exec_paral...@vcs0.html
>
> * igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-contexts-bsd2:
> - shard-tglb: [PASS][20] -> [INCOMPLETE][2
