Re: [Interest] Compiling Qt 4.8.0 on Windows 7 with NTFS folder mounts

2012-01-16 Thread Joerg Bornemann
On 11/01/2012 23:14, ext Christian Quast wrote: I am trying to compile Qt 4.8.0 on Windows. My set-up is: - Windows 7 (64 bit) fully updated - mingw32 provided by Qt Creator 2.4.0 - install path c:\Development\Libraries\Qt-4.8.0mingw32-src c:\Development is actually the mount point of a

Re: [Interest] Problem creating a dll that uses Qt (mingw)

2012-01-16 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday, 16 de January de 2012 15.52.44, erick oliveira da silva wrote: Hi, I am new with qt programming using mingw. I have compiled Qt 4.7.4 statically with gcc(mingw) version 4.4.0 at windows vista 32 bits, following the instructions in this page:

Re: [Interest] Problem creating a dll that uses Qt (mingw)

2012-01-16 Thread erick oliveira da silva
Hallo Thales, I included the qmake and library directories in PATH but unfortunatelly nothing changed. Thanks anyway. Thiago, sorry, but I am not sure if I understood correctly your sugestion: so, I tried to build my dll (that export functions that have several Qt functions and objects) in a

Re: [Interest] Problem creating a dll that uses Qt (mingw)

2012-01-16 Thread Till Oliver Knoll
You have warnings of some BUILT_DLL being redefined. Fix that first. Then I use QT += whatever instead of your QT *= whatever I don't know what the *= operator is supposed to do, even though I think it exists. Anyway, QtCore being linked by default this is most probably not the

Re: [Interest] [Qt-interest] QDecimal library is now available

2012-01-16 Thread Till Oliver Knoll
Am 16.01.2012 um 10:31 schrieb Semih Cemiloglu se...@cemiloglu.org: I would like to announce initial public release of QDecimal library. Thanks :) The name suggests that there is a strong intention to have this included with the actual Qt sources? Otherwise I thought the Q prefix was

Re: [Interest] Problem creating a dll that uses Qt (mingw)

2012-01-16 Thread Lincoln Ramsay
On 01/17/2012 04:54 AM, ext Till Oliver Knoll wrote: I don't know what the *= operator is supposed to do, even though I think it exists. It means add these values to this variable unless they are already there. In pseudocode: for each value (list) { if (!variable.contains(value))