[Interest] Fwd: Google Play warning: Your app is using an incorrect implementation of in-app billing

2016-07-28 Thread Nuno Santos
I have just received the email below from Google Play. Has anyone had the same report? Since I use QtPurchasing to handle my purchases, I was wondering if this something I need to add, or something that needs to be added to the lib itself. Nuno > Hello Google Play Developer, > > We detected

Re: [Interest] Why does QML prefer 'count' over '.length'?

2016-07-28 Thread Jason H
+1 Well said, and really the source of my frustration.    Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 12:39 PM From: "Michael Brasser" To: "J-P Nurmi" , "interest@qt-project.org" Subject: Re: [Interest] Why does QML prefer 'count' over

Re: [Interest] CentOS 6 vs 7

2016-07-28 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
On quarta-feira, 27 de julho de 2016 21:38:21 PDT Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > Now, my tool in reality doesn't need libudev at all, so just to "hack" > it I created a soft link of .0 to .1... :) And walla it ran fine. That's not recommended. The soname changed because something was removed or

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.6.1(-1) release for Visual Studio 2010?

2016-07-28 Thread Mark Gaiser
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quinta-feira, 28 de julho de 2016 17:00:01 PDT Mark Gaiser wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Qt 5.6 should work just fine under Visual Studio 2010, but i can't find > the > > binary release [1]. It starts with Visual

Re: [Interest] Why does QML prefer 'count' over '.length'?

2016-07-28 Thread Michael Brasser
Hi, While I don't have anything to add on the relative merits of length vs count , I do understand the general frustration. With large QML projects there can be a large number of "data collections". Those might be implemented in terms of ListModel, a custom QAbstractListModel-derived class,

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.6.1(-1) release for Visual Studio 2010?

2016-07-28 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 28 de julho de 2016 17:00:01 PDT Mark Gaiser wrote: > Hi, > > Qt 5.6 should work just fine under Visual Studio 2010, but i can't find the > binary release [1]. It starts with Visual Studio 2013 in that folder. > > Is Qt not providing a 2010 build anymore? We're not. Feel free

Re: [Interest] Why does QML prefer 'count' over '.length'?

2016-07-28 Thread J-P Nurmi
On Thursday, July 28, 2016 15:46, Jason H wrote: > Look, I know JS was invented in 10 days back in 1995. There's no shortage of > things to complain about. But > 'length' was chosen, and it is the number of items. I would agree with you > that length is not as good as 'count',

[Interest] Qt 5.6.1(-1) release for Visual Studio 2010?

2016-07-28 Thread Mark Gaiser
Hi, Qt 5.6 should work just fine under Visual Studio 2010, but i can't find the binary release [1]. It starts with Visual Studio 2013 in that folder. Is Qt not providing a 2010 build anymore? Best regards, Mark [1] https://download.qt.io/official_releases/qt/5.6/5.6.1-1/

Re: [Interest] Why does QML prefer 'count' over '.length'?

2016-07-28 Thread Jason H
> It makes perfect sense. "count" makes sense for visual things. "length" only > means "amount" in computer science, and only then in the realm of containers. > You don't say "white blood cell length" when referring to the amount of blood > white cells, you say "white blood cell count". You

Re: [Interest] Why does QML prefer 'count' over '.length'?

2016-07-28 Thread Mitch Curtis
> -Original Message- > From: Interest [mailto:interest-bounces+mitch.curtis=qt...@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Jason H > Sent: Wednesday, 27 July 2016 4:32 PM > To: J-P Nurmi > Cc: interest@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Interest] Why does QML prefer 'count' over