Re: [Interest] QApplication instead of QGuiApplication for QML only projects?

Thanks Thiago, that's great to hear! Have a nice day, Bernhard 2017-06-23 19:55 GMT+02:00 Thiago Macieira : > On Friday, 23 June 2017 10:21:20 PDT Bernhard B wrote: > > I now replaced QGuiApplication with QApplication, which _seems_ to work > (at > > least I couldn't

Re: [Interest] QApplication instead of QGuiApplication for QML only projects?

On Friday, 23 June 2017 10:21:20 PDT Bernhard B wrote: > I now replaced QGuiApplication with QApplication, which _seems_ to work (at > least I couldn't recognize any strange behaviour after a quick test). But > is it really safe to use QApplication instead of QGuiApplication for all > platforms

Re: [Interest] QML disappointments

Every time the API limit the future development of your code, it's a good thing to do. But Qt is open source project. I'm sure if you propose a patch to improve QtWidgets, Qt devs will be very happy ! - Mail original - De: "Jean-Michaël Celerier"

Re: [Interest] QML disappointments

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 7:19 PM, wrote: > > Don't be rude with Qt Company. Maybe they're just following the opinion of > lot of Qt devs who think QtWidgets is not perfect and we need a new API and > render engine for modern GPU and new supported devices (mobiles, embedded

Re: [Interest] QML disappointments

The backbone of Qml is better then QWidgets IMO, the GUI surface layer lack some serious attention, look like a bunch of C++ coder found it fun to design and code the core and left the GUI part to a rookie. Try to use the Qml TreeView and see how much fun you will get! you need to create a C++

[Interest] QApplication instead of QGuiApplication for QML only projects?

Hi, up to now I always used QGuiApplication when developing QML only applications. However, the QtCharts module requires QApplication instead of QGuiApplication, otherwise it stops with an assert: "ASSERT: "Unable to render embedded object: File ("No style available without QApplication) not

Re: [Interest] QML disappointments

@Jason Thanks to work on this tests for QML UI. It's always a good think that someone is volunteer to improve tests and stability of Qt. Thanks very much ! @Nishant Parashar Don't be rude with Qt Company. Maybe they're just following the opinion of lot of Qt devs who think QtWidgets

Re: [Interest] QML disappointments

I also miss QWidget. :( Such a shame that it was removed, right? From: Interest [mailto:interest-bounces+mitch.curtis=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Nishant Parashar Sent: Friday, 23 June 2017 6:43 PM To: Jason H Cc: interestqt-project.org Subject:

Re: [Interest] QML disappointments

Qt company belive that qml is the best thing that happened to qt. So many years have passed and we still see this. Reminds me of Nokia, they kept saying windows phone will succeed. Too late. Problem is that unlike windows phone Qt has no serious compitition (well wxwidgets is not that level). So

[Interest] QML disappointments

So I've been using Qt for years (2004) and I like a lot about it. But QML continually disappoints. I just don't remember all these rendering issues on QWidgets. They Just Worked (tm). But QML fails to render reliably on all platforms. Whether it's mipmap on iOS, SVG scaling on Android...