[Interest] How to embed a "rdesktop" window in a QGraphicsScene

Hi, All. I have already embedded a "rdesktop" (Windows (R) Remote Desktop Client) in a common QWidget using rdesktop's parameter -X (winID) and extracting this information directly from QWidget ( widget->winId(); ). Now I want to do some fancy stuff like switching among several remote desktop

Re: [Interest] Backporting bugs to Qt 5.6

Thanks both, On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 10:45 PM Florian Bruhin wrote: > According to [1], Debian stable packages Qt 5.7.1 (which is not an LTS), > and testing/unstable both ship 5.11.1. Yes, you are absolutely right. I got the versions mixed up. > See [2]. The Qt 5.6 release was in March 2016,

Re: [Interest] Backporting bugs to Qt 5.6

Hey, On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 09:49:19AM +0200, Danny Smit wrote: > I'm running into two (old) Qt bugs using the latest Debian, with still > uses the LTS Qt 5.6. What do you mean with "the latest Debian"? According to [1], Debian stable packages Qt 5.7.1 (which is not an LTS), and

Re: [Interest] iOS 12 iPhoneX crashing on app launch

Nope Not Qt's fault. It was my janky hack to get signal strength. > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2018 at 4:12 PM > From: "Jason H" > To: "interestqt-project.org" > Subject: [Interest] iOS 12 iPhoneX crashing on app launch > > 2018-09-21 16:03:42.482151-0400 webtestkit[600:263350] machine

[Interest] iOS 12 iPhoneX crashing on app launch

2018-09-21 16:03:42.482151-0400 webtestkit[600:263350] machine iPhone10,3 2018-09-21 16:03:42.482208-0400 webtestkit[600:263350] version Darwin Kernel Version 18.0.0: Tue Aug 14 22:07:16 PDT 2018; root:xnu-4903.202.2~1/RELEASE_ARM64_T8015 2018-09-21 16:03:42.482231-0400 webtestkit[600:263350]

Re: [Interest] Deploying a linux binary?

I almost have this running, but the command: cp -r ~/Qt/5.9.1/gcc_64/qml/QtQuick/Controls/* qml/QtQuick/Controls/   in the script doesn't make any sense to me. AFAICT, qml/QtQuick/Controls/ does not exist, so I expect this command to fail, and it does: cp:

Re: [Interest] cmake and auto-generated sources

21.09.2018, 20:17, "Thiago Macieira" : > On Friday, 21 September 2018 07:58:51 PDT René J.V. Bertin wrote: >>  I think qmake-based projects generate those things as the first step during >>  a make, while cmake-based projects generate them on an as-needed basis. > > Both do the same at the same

Re: [Interest] cmake and auto-generated sources

On Friday, 21 September 2018 07:58:51 PDT René J.V. Bertin wrote: > I think qmake-based projects generate those things as the first step during > a make, while cmake-based projects generate them on an as-needed basis. Both do the same at the same time, during make. You should build your project

[Interest] cmake and auto-generated sources

Hi, I've asked this before on a KDE list, so apologies if you've seen the question already. Is there a way to generate all the autogen stuff after running cmake? Often, if you import a fresh source tree of a cmake-based project into an IDE like kdevelop, cmake will be run to figure out the

[Interest] lists.qt-project.org down/unreachable

lists.qt-project.org has been down/unreachable for a couple of days - not sure who to contact to let them know... https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/releasing/ --- Andy Maloney // https://asmaloney.com twitter ~ @asmaloney

Re: [Interest] Backporting bugs to Qt 5.6

Hi, Thanks for showing interest in contributing to Qt. You will probably want to read http://wiki.qt.io/Qt_Contribution_Guidelines And specifically to your questions, bug fixes first go to the current stable brach of Qt (5.11.3 in this case), and once the patches are in, they can be

Re: [Interest] Deploying a linux binary?

I tried linuxdeployqt but ran into graphical issues to the qt.conf file: https://github.com/probonopd/linuxdeployqt/issues/280 I ended up building statically, which was much easier. From: Interest on behalf of Jason H Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2018

[Interest] Backporting bugs to Qt 5.6

Hi all, I'm running into two (old) Qt bugs using the latest Debian, with still uses the LTS Qt 5.6. Preferably I'd like to see them fixed upstream, so that the whole world can benefit from the changes, instead of applying patches locally. I'm willing to send pull requests of needed. My real

Re: [Interest] Priority of bugs

From: Interest on behalf of Thiago Macieira On Thursday, 20 September 2018 08:20:23 PDT Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > 20.09.2018, 15:59, "Krzysztof Kawa" : > > Hi, > > Are only P0 reports looked at? >P1 blocks a release. >Or at least it should.

Re: [Interest] Priority of bugs

> -Original Message- > From: Interest On > Behalf Of Krzysztof Kawa ... > Anyway, I really don't want to stretch this rant. I'm just bummed about the > degrading quality of my favorite framework and I hoped I'm not the only one > that noticed. But maybe I am. I won't justify why a

Re: [Interest] Priority of bugs

> On 21 Sep 2018, at 01:07, Nyall Dawson wrote: > > FWIW, I've also encountered some serious issues with this > functionality under gnome, where floating docks will get stacked under > main windows if they were previously tabbed and restoreState is > called. The only "fix" is to disable this