Sebastian, Thanks for this delightful answer.
I totally agree with your points and I couldn’t have them exposed better myself. You are not alone! Best regards, Nuno PS: isn’t a mobile device a embedded device anyway? XD > On 8 Feb 2019, at 17:44, m...@herrdiel.de wrote: > > "All", > > somebody who calls a whole platform "idiot" lacks any respect for those > who work in that field. Doing so repetetively whenever mentioning > "phones", is not a slip of the keyboard but is done intentional - which > puts the author in the very vincinity of his own vocabulary. > > I don't want to read this kind of indignity ever and anon. I've rarely > seen such constantly condescending and trolling behavior being > tolerated as long as with this individual. > > Loaden with self-advertizing links, his rants and unproven premises > often need no more factual base than his opinion and in their > narcissistic self-repetition they have long become spam. It is fine to > have an opinion. It's ok to state it clearly. But to hawk it with > almost every email and in every non-related context is getting a tad > tedious. > > I don't want programmers (like me) to be insulted as "script kiddies" > and "12 year old boy"s with "shabby skill levels" that write "idiot > apps" for "idiot phones" that have "the lifespan of a fruit fly". It's > ok to be carried away a bit, but these deliberate defamations are a pattern. > > I don't want to read all that self-righteous boasting about his > experience from the age of vacuum tubes and Zuse I. I just don't care. > It's just OT, as Giuseppe D'Angelo pointed out a while ago. > > I don't want to read stuff like "QML (puke)" from somebody who has long > passed puberty. > > I do appreciate the open discussion style on this list. I even do > appreciate a somewhat harsh style, if it has a factual base and is > getting straight to the point instead of b*s*ing around. But those > lengthy wallpapers our President of Logikal solutions commonly utters, > have long since crossed the border from amusing to annoying. > > As for me, I have just plonked Roland Hughes again (no, not the first > time). But that doesn't help if I have to read through all the > avalanches of replies who just feed the troll (like mine now, probably). > > I'd be happy to see him banned, at least temporarily. But then again, I > am just a 12-y-o script kiddie (not true) with a shabby skill level > (true), so you won't really need advice from me. > > Sorry for the rant. Won't happen again on this topic. > > Sebastian > > > Am 08.02.2019 um 15:19 schrieb rol...@logikalsolutions.com > <mailto:rol...@logikalsolutions.com>: >> >> All, >> >> Slightly off topic but still relevant, if Qt cares even slightly about >> still being used in the embedded world. If all they care about are >> idiot phones and that declining market, I guess this doesn't matter. >> >> https://barrgroup.com/Embedded-Systems/Books/Embedded-C-Coding-Standard >> >> Given much of the embedded world tries to adhere (mostly) to the Barr >> standard but falls victim to the wordiness of our C++ world (even >> COBOL looks askance at Q_PROPERTY macros) we tend to work in worlds >> which require multiple right margins, only one of which has a hard >> wrap. While it would be awesome if QtCreator could let it be >> completely arbitrary as Sublime does: >> >> "rulers": [80, 100, 120], >> "word_wrap": true, >> "wrap_width": 120 >> >> It would be nice to be able set 2 with the farthest one being the wrap >> point if wrapping is enabled. Most shops strive for 80 but put in >> their "overrides" for the standard a hard limit of 130. As it stands >> now we can see what we strive for or the hard wall, but not both. >> >> Thanks >> > -- > http://www.classintouch.de <http://www.classintouch.de/> - Tablet-Software > für Lehrer > > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org <mailto:Interest@qt-project.org> > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest > <https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest>
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest