Hi,
I was just trying the long waited Qt 5.15.8 but stumbled on the following
problem. The application crashes:
F imaginando.frm: java_vm_ext.cc:578] JNI DETECTED ERROR IN APPLICATION: JNI
NewGlobalRef called with pending exception java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
On 2022-01-05 05:46, Ramakanth Kesireddy wrote:
Hi all,
I have QtQuick 2D application running on embedded device configured
with
eglfs( OpenGL ES2.x).
Inorder to port the application to Qt 6.2, Does openGL support is
available
in Qt 6.2 when configured with eglfs or there any attribute to
Thanks for the info
~~Scott
Original message
From: Thiago Macieira
Date: 1/5/22 4:31 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: interest@qt-project.org
Cc: Scott Bloom
Subject: Re: [Interest] Qthread from QFuture?
On Tuesday, 4 January 2022 22:01:20 -03 Scott Bloom wrote:
> I appreciate the
On Tuesday, 4 January 2022 22:01:20 -03 Scott Bloom wrote:
> I appreciate the information. However, I don’t understand why a QFuture
> created by QtConcurrent::run, if it can tell isRunning, why it cant return
> the QThread its using?
Because you don't have a use-case for using that pointer.
Hi, Joshua,
I am not sure how option #2 would work in practice. If you edit the document
without updating the undo block, then the top command of the undo stack will
refer to an outdated version of the document and when you execute it, you would
in many cases corrupt the document.
Since all
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 11:54 AM Ulf Hermann wrote:
> would import a class called "QQmlRegistration". There
> is no such class in that header. It's a collection of macros. The
> correct form is .
>
Yes, I suppose, albeit you do ship .
___
Interest
I didn't mean the name's wrong, simply that I read
in the docs instead of or
something akin.
would import a class called "QQmlRegistration". There
is no such class in that header. It's a collection of macros. The
correct form is .
best regards,
Ulf
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 11:23 AM Ulf Hermann wrote:
> > On a side note, I was wondering, why these, contrary to other Qt
> > headers, don't provide cpp style naming?
>
> Where do you see the lack in cpp style naming? What name is wrong?
>
I didn't mean the name's wrong, simply that I read
in
On a side note, I was wondering, why these, contrary to other Qt
headers, don't provide cpp style naming?
Where do you see the lack in cpp style naming? What name is wrong?
best regards,
Ulf
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
Daljit,
Try this simple hack.
Put in scene a qml item with an infinite animation like a bouncing rectangle.
This will force the window to render. See if this makes any difference. If my
theory is correct, simply moving the mouse on top of the window will also make
the rendering happen more
10 matches
Mail list logo
