Re: [Interest] Qt 6.2 vs. Qt 5.15 – The Feature Parity Comparison – QtPDF

2021-09-03 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hi, On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 09:52:04AM +0200, Heiko Gerdau wrote: > Our main usecase is the quick display of stored external (and selfmade) > PDF-documents without the need to start an external application. Is that so > uncommon? FWIW if simple displaying of PDFs is all you need, you can also

Re: [Interest] L Word

2021-04-29 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hey everyone, On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 12:13:13PM +0300, coroberti wrote: > Dear Guiseppe, > You were very helpful for the list members and personally to me. > The list will deteriorate without you. > > Sincerely hope that the moderator will start to function and to do something. > > Note, that

Re: [Interest] Mixing Commercial and Open Source license for different projects

2021-03-16 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hey, On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 04:16:53PM +0100, James Maxwell wrote: > If I have a commercial Qt license, can I still develop for projects > which are going to be released under LGPL where also other people > don't have a Qt license (of course assuming we only use LGPL Qt and > nothing of the

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine 5.15.3 tag

2021-03-09 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hey Tuukaa, On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 09:24:23PM +, Tuukka Turunen wrote: > I do understand the desire to have a supported / tagged release of QWE > and it is possible that it might even work quite well on an earlier > release of Qt. However, we are testing it in conjunction with the > other

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine 5.15.3 tag

2021-03-09 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 06:37:35PM +0100, Benjamin TERRIER wrote: > I am pretty sure that Linux distros which have Qt 5.15 would be interested > in upgrading their Qt WebEngine to 5.15.3+ They can - Gentoo did even before the release, Archlinux did after I asked them to do so and convinced them

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine 5.15.3 tag

2021-03-09 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:41:51AM +0100, Benjamin TERRIER wrote: > I would not mind if it was just a matter of tag, but the fact that the > change file for 5.15.3 (changes-5.15.3) is not present on the 5.15.3 branch > in the public repo does not help making this branch trustworthy. That's no

Re: [Interest] Qt 6 Ubuntu package

2021-01-27 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hey, On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:08:44PM +0530, Nibedit Dey wrote: > I am looking for a way to install Qt6 without downloading the > *qt-unified-linux-x86-4.0.1-online.run* file. > Is there a Qt 6 Ubuntu package like the one for Qt 5? e.g.:- *sudo apt-get > install qt5-default* Ubuntu's packages

Re: [Interest] QPA display system query ?

2021-01-19 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hey, On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 03:33:58PM -0800, Nicholas Yue wrote: > Is there some command line query I can make to determine the QPA display > system that is being used? For example, running that command on e.g. an > Ubuntu box may return something like *xcb* It sounds like

Re: [Interest] Will a Qt 5.x release support macOS 11?

2020-12-09 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 09:19:16AM +0100, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > On Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2020 08:07:45 CET Ben Haller via Interest wrote: > > Hi all. Just wondering whether there is any plan for any Qt 5.x release to > > support macOS 11. At present, Qt 5.15 supports only through macOS

Re: [Interest] Qt 6.0.0 released

2020-12-08 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 03:19:51PM +, Nuno Santos wrote: > How can install this. It does not show up in Maintenance Tool. Shows up just fine for me FWIW. Florian -- m...@the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP) | https://www.qutebrowser.org https://bruhin.software/ |

Re: [Interest] Qt5 font size issue with fontconfig

2020-11-12 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 10:01:23AM +, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > On 12/11/20 8:47 pm, Florian Bruhin wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:37:33AM +, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > On 12/11/20 2:46 am, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > > NEVER calculate font size

Re: [Interest] Qt5 font size issue with fontconfig

2020-11-12 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:37:33AM +, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On 12/11/20 2:46 am, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > > NEVER calculate font sizes in pixels. Your design is wrong. Delete this > > function and use point sizes throughout. > > Too bad the Qt Widget stylesheet function only supports

Re: [Interest] [Development] Windows 7 support will be dropped in Qt 6

2020-06-15 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 06:02:53PM +, Jérôme Godbout wrote: > or Windows 11 by the time Qt 6 and you get your application ready "Microsoft > will release Windows 11 on July 29, 2020, and will be available to the > general public." Do you have a source for that? I'm assuming it's

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.15 for Linux/X11 : "-qt-xcb" no longer supported?

2020-05-25 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 06:56:32PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Friday, 22 May 2020 07:54:03 PDT Florian Bruhin wrote: > > I'm talking about running Qt's binary releases, not building from sources. > > Then take the list of "not found" and pass it through your pac

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.15 for Linux/X11 : "-qt-xcb" no longer supported?

2020-05-22 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 04:43:51PM +0200, Shawn Rutledge wrote: > > > > On 2020 May 22, at 16:25, Florian Bruhin wrote: > > > > Hey, > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 05:48:09PM +, Kai Köhne wrote: > >> And indeed the linux documen

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.15 for Linux/X11 : "-qt-xcb" no longer supported?

2020-05-22 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hey, On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 05:48:09PM +, Kai Köhne wrote: > And indeed the linux documentation wasn't updated yet :/ > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtdoc/+/300239 Is there some good place to start documenting what packages are needed for the XCB platform plugin? It took me a

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.12.x LTS

2020-05-19 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 12:38:53PM +0530, Ramakanth Kesireddy wrote: > Apart from CVE-2020-0569 and CVE-2020-0570, could you please let me know > other security fixes that donot have associated CVE or any other CVEs > backported to Qt 5.12.8? You might want to check the change files for 5.12.8:

Re: [Interest] unexpected result from QString::compare

2020-05-08 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 08:51:19AM +, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On 8/5/20 5:13 pm, Fabrice Mousset | GEOCEPT GmbH wrote: > > Perhaps you should use QString::localeAwareCompare() ? > > > Thanks, I didn't know about that. Maybe the QString::compare() documentation > could mention it... From

Re: [Interest] QVariant compare operator

2020-04-20 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 09:50:06AM -0600, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Monday, 20 April 2020 03:28:48 MDT Florian Bruhin wrote: > > FWIW that's the choice Python had taken with Python 2 (ordering different > > types by their type name). It was widely regarded as a bad decision a

Re: [Interest] QVariant compare operator

2020-04-20 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 12:42:16PM -0300, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Sunday, 19 April 2020 09:39:40 -03 André Pönitz wrote: > > > What about non-integral types? > > > > They are compared by typeName(). So any QChar would be less-than any > > QRegularExpression. > > We can order by type, but I

[Interest] Qt and Open Source

2020-04-09 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hi, (Note: Parts of this mail are similar to a mail I sent to the kde-community list a couple of minutes ago, but the majority of it is different) As some people here might already know, the KDE Free Qt foundation made a very concerning announcement yesterday:

Re: [Interest] QtWebkit error while building Qt5.12.7 sources

2020-02-20 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 09:02:13AM +1000, Nyall Dawson wrote: > An example: qtwebkit allows rendering of HTML content direct to a > QPainter surface, keeping text as text objects and other components as > vectors. This isn't possible in the webengine classes, at best you can > render a rasterized

Re: [Interest] Why doesn't my model filter update?

2020-02-19 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 04:49:57PM -0500, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > On 18/02/2020 16.31, Konstantin Shegunov wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 11:20 PM Matthew Woehlke wrote: > >> I wonder if anyone else can spot it? ;-) > > > > Without knowing anything about the code at all, my best guess based

Re: [Interest] equivalent of python glob

2019-08-27 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 11:59:00PM +, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > I think it's a shame there isn't something simpler built in to C++ or Qt > though. There's std::filesystem::path::append in C++17: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/filesystem/path/append Florian -- https://www.qutebrowser.org |

Re: [Interest] [PySide] PySide2 installer for windows?

2019-05-20 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hi, On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 12:07:42PM +1200, Frank Rueter | OHUfx wrote: > So the only way out of this is update my code to Python3? You might want to consider doing that anyways, if you haven't yet. Python 2 is EOL (including security fixes) in about half a year: https://pythonclock.org/

Re: [Interest] Backporting bugs to Qt 5.6

2018-09-21 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hey, On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 09:49:19AM +0200, Danny Smit wrote: > I'm running into two (old) Qt bugs using the latest Debian, with still > uses the LTS Qt 5.6. What do you mean with "the latest Debian"? According to [1], Debian stable packages Qt 5.7.1 (which is not an LTS), and

Re: [Interest] How do I get the most robust version of 5.10

2018-04-14 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 02:32:43PM -0400, william.croc...@analog.com wrote: > > > > > > > It immediately failed one of my regression tests. > > > You should have known there was an issue because I here it has been fixed > > > in > > > 5.11 > > > > Of course there are problems. Do you want us

[Interest] qutebrowser v1.0.0 released!

2017-10-12 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hey, I'm delighted to announce that I just released qutebrowser v1.0.0! qutebrowser is a keyboard driven browser with a vim-like, minimalistic interface. It's written using PyQt and cross-platform. This release comes with many big breaking changes such as the new config and QtWebEngine by

Re: [Interest] QWebEngine block domain

2017-06-14 Thread Florian Bruhin
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 09:41:17PM -0700, Kevin Mcintyre wrote: > Is it possible to block requests, like for instance to a specific domain. > > Is see QWebEngineUrlRequestInterceptor but this is only informational. Only informational how? There's a QWebEngineUrlRequestInfo::block() which seems

[Interest] Crowdfunding campaign for new config system in qutebrowser

2017-04-18 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hi, I'm the main developer of qutebrowser, a keyboard-focused vim-like web browser, built using PyQt: https://www.qutebrowser.org/ Like last year, I'd love to spend my summer holidays working full-time on qutebrowser again! This is why I started another crowdfunding - this time with the goal of

[Interest] Crowdfunding campaign for QtWebEngine support in qutebrowser, a vim-like browser

2016-03-24 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hi! (first of all, I hope this kind of thing is okay on this list - I decided to go for it after I saw some release announcements too. Please let me know if not, and sorry!) I'm the main developer of qutebrowser, a keyboard-focused vim-like web browser built using Qt and Python: