Re: [Interest] [Qt-creator] Android will require 64bit soon

2019-05-28 Thread Guenter Schwann via Interest
On Samstag, 2. Februar 2019 16:30:55 CEST ekke wrote: > Am 02.02.19 um 04:29 schrieb Aleksey Kontsevich: > > 01.02.2019, 12:11, "ekke" : > >> Also I think I must then also compile OpenSSL for 32 bit and 64 bit and > >> then need to know HowTo include into .pro> > > That could help You to do this:

Re: [Interest] Painting with QPainter to QPixmap in C++ method invoked from QML

2018-09-12 Thread Guenter Schwann via Interest
On Mittwoch, 12. September 2018 09:40:08 CEST Igor Mironchik wrote: > Hello. > > Let's say I have C++ code to draw to QPixmap with QPainter. > > This code returns data:image/png;base64,... string that can be used in QML. > > But when I invoke this method from QML I've got > > QPainter::begin:

Re: [Interest] iOS build rejected by App Store Connect

2018-09-03 Thread Guenter Schwann via Interest
t catalog for the icons. Ekke's blog post helped me a lot: https://appbus.wordpress.com/2017/10/06/ios-11-and-xcode-9-in-qt-5-9-x-projects/ -- Guenter Schwann Viking Software http://www.vikingsoftware.com ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project

Re: [Interest] QML vs Electron

2018-08-07 Thread Guenter Schwann via Interest
s (apk)? >From the FAQ: "The user of your application has to be able to re-link your application against a different or modified version of the Qt library. ..." Guenter Schwann http://www.vikingsoftware.com ___ Interest mailing list Inte

Re: [Interest] Optimizing performance with hundreds of widgets

2017-02-21 Thread Guenter Schwann
On Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2017 17:28:22 CET Gibbs, Matt wrote: > Hi All, > > I’m working on a Qt-based project to display rapidly updating information > from a control system. I want to display hundreds of signals, each > updating at about 10 Hz. As a performance test, I’ve thrown 500 Labels in

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator does not "see" precompiled header

2017-02-21 Thread Guenter Schwann
On Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2017 17:17:14 CET Alexander Dyagilev wrote: > Hello, > > It's very annoying... Isn't it? > > One has to write all these includes in every header file. Again and > again... :( You could include the "precompile-header" (pch.h). As this includes all the needed headers.

Re: [Interest] [PROGRESS] Long pause with 5.7

2016-11-14 Thread Guenter Schwann
On Montag, 14. November 2016 19:15:46 CET william.croc...@analog.com wrote: > - Restoring window locations to where the user left them... >Just one of a dozen behaviors of a good application >which is not implemented well (if at all) by Qt and, >therefore, has to be implemented by the

Re: [Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

2016-05-18 Thread Guenter Schwann
On Tuesday, April 05, 2016 05:18:08 PM Emre Besirik wrote: > Some of the lacking features are smart autocomplete maybe At least with QtCreator 4.0 beta most issues are resolved for me. What exactly do you mean by "smart"? > Ctrl+K like search but improved in a better UI I watched

Re: [Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

2016-05-18 Thread Guenter Schwann
On Tuesday, April 05, 2016 04:19:42 PM NoMercy wrote: > That QtCreator is eons behind current technology and trends, isn't it very > obvious? No! Absolutely not. QtCreator is a really great IDE. Very lightweight, but still very powerful. Simply using the "Esc" button is a single fantastic feature

Re: [Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

2016-04-05 Thread Guenter Schwann
On Monday, April 04, 2016 03:28:03 PM Emre Besirik wrote: > * Search! (like spotlight search with just one shortcut key to open file > or go to a particular location in your code): > * search symbols > * files in your project > * search everywhere > * you can lookout jetbrains IDEs for more

Re: [Interest] How can I build qt-Windows using WMF as multimedia backend?

2016-03-06 Thread Guenter Schwann
On Sunday, March 06, 2016 08:26:17 AM Liang Jian wrote: > Thank you for the reply. > But do you know why WMF backend will be removed from Qt 5.7 given the > fact that DirectShow has been deprecated by Microsoft and WMF seems to be > the future? Very good question. Especially as I'm