On 10/9/19 5:00 AM, alexander golks wrote:
Am Wed, 9 Oct 2019 11:05:08 +0200
schrieb Uwe Rathmann<uwe.rathm...@tigertal.de>:
But I have a strong opinion about using FUD as sales strategy:
- intimidation paragraphs
- blacklisting projects that follow the rules of the LGPL properly
- giving wrong information ( check the video ) about the LGPL
Uwe
+1
+1
It's the viciously bitter ex-wife's view of alimony.
They want to be paid a hideous amount of money for the time spent with
you. Then they want to be paid for all of the time you were "dating"
including the times between dating sessions when you were broken up, and
finally they ransom the children in the form of royalties.
No business which will still be viable in 3-5 years would ever agree to
this.
I love everyone telling people to "ask their sales rep" because when you
ask a sales rep EVERYBODY needs a license, the biggest most expensive
license they have because the spousal unit is pricing out a new 'Cedes
and they need the commission to pay for it.
Personally I'm morally and professionally offended at the
commercialization/licensing of OpenSource products. It always has a bait
& switch feel to it, especially when the commercial side keeps trying to
shrink the scope of OpenSource usage.
--
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593
http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
http://www.johnsmith-book.com
http://www.logikalblog.com
http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
