Re: [Interest] QEventDispatcherGlib: timers don't timeout due to higher priority of socket notifier event dispatching

2015-09-18 Thread Danny Smit
> From the description of the symptom and from the fact that the non-glib > dispatcher behaves differently, it sounds like this behaviour is not intended. > > I'll ask you to file a bug about this. Unfortunately, I can tell you the bug > will get assigned to me and I have little clue about the

Re: [Interest] QEventDispatcherGlib: timers don't timeout due to higher priority of socket notifier event dispatching.

2015-09-17 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday 17 September 2015 15:38:04 Danny Smit wrote: > Can someone advise whether this is the behavior as intended or whether > this points to an issue in Qt? >From the description of the symptom and from the fact that the non-glib dispatcher behaves differently, it sounds like this

[Interest] QEventDispatcherGlib: timers don't timeout due to higher priority of socket notifier event dispatching.

2015-09-17 Thread Danny Smit
I'm running into an issue where it seems that Qt timers are not timing out anymore when the application has a lot of other events (say continues stream of events) to process. For instance, when the application receives lots of small pieces of data on (TCP) sockets, resulting in a lot of events to