Re: [Interest] QtWebkit replacement status...

2015-03-24 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
Subject: Re: [Interest] QtWebkit replacement status... Hi Scott, On Monday 23 March 2015 15:00:16 Scott Aron Bloom wrote: Which version of Qt should I use? 5.4? well, I currently use Qt5.4.0 with webkit since there recently have some annoying bugs with the nsapi plugin been fixed

Re: [Interest] QtWebkit replacement status...

2015-03-24 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
: Re: [Interest] QtWebkit replacement status... On Friday 20 March 2015 21:59:10 Scott Aron Bloom wrote: What is the status of Qt WebEngine? Meaning, is it stable enough, to replace qtwebkit on production quality applications yet? Lots of talk about it's the future.. but I cant find

Re: [Interest] QtWebkit replacement status...

2015-03-24 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
24.03.2015, 12:15, Scott Aron Bloom sc...@towel42.com: My biggest problem with webkit, is the TONS of dependencies it requires.. My app is not a web app, we use it for embedded help.. In Qt4, it added 1 or 2 dlls, in Qt5, we wind up having to include a large portion of Qt that my app

Re: [Interest] QtWebkit replacement status...

2015-03-23 Thread Frank Hemer
On Friday 20 March 2015 21:59:10 Scott Aron Bloom wrote: What is the status of Qt WebEngine? Meaning, is it stable enough, to replace qtwebkit on production quality applications yet? Lots of talk about it's the future.. but I cant find on google, has it been fully replaced and fully

Re: [Interest] QtWebkit replacement status...

2015-03-23 Thread Frank Hemer
+scott.bloom=onshorecs@qt-project.org [mailto:interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Frank Hemer Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 5:00 AM To: interest@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Interest] QtWebkit replacement status... On Friday 20 March 2015 21:59:10 Scott Aron

[Interest] QtWebkit replacement status...

2015-03-23 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
What is the status of Qt WebEngine? Meaning, is it stable enough, to replace qtwebkit on production quality applications yet? Lots of talk about it's the future.. but I cant find on google, has it been fully replaced and fully working. The webpages I render in my app, are pretty simple, no

Re: [Interest] QtWebkit replacement status...

2015-03-23 Thread Frank Hemer
+scott.bloom=onshorecs@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Frank Hemer Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 8:14 AM To: interest@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Interest] QtWebkit replacement status... Hi Scott, On Monday 23 March 2015 15:00:16 Scott Aron Bloom wrote: Which version of Qt should I use? 5.4

Re: [Interest] QtWebkit replacement status...

2015-03-23 Thread Jason Dolan
I would love to hear some “official” input on this. Our project will be migrating to Qt5 later on this year. One of our 3rd-party services is embedded into our product as a webpage. That 3rd-party makes use of nsapi plugins. Primarily for pdf viewing. We have then used QWebPluginFactory to

Re: [Interest] QtWebkit replacement status...

2015-03-23 Thread Ian Monroe
nsapi has no future. For PDF just use a JavaScript viewer instead if the PDFs need to be embedded into a web page, like what Firefox does. If they aren't embedded it wouldn't take much to have your code detect that the user click on a PDF url and do something smart. Ian On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at

Re: [Interest] QtWebkit replacement status...

2015-03-23 Thread Andreas Pakulat
Hi, On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Frank Hemer fr...@hemer.org wrote: Hi Scott, On Monday 23 March 2015 15:00:16 Scott Aron Bloom wrote: Which version of Qt should I use? 5.4? well, I currently use Qt5.4.0 with webkit since there recently have some annoying bugs with the nsapi plugin