I do not care about binaries, which I used to build myself anyway. They are
built once.
But I do not want to lose 2010 support.
When your code is dependent on different languages and 3rd party products
you tend to stay on the old compilers for long time.
Often you have to skip versions cause
The OpenGL dependency should be dropped altogether for the QtGUI dll, imho.
Just use the platforms own rendering engine to do all the rendering.
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Yves Bailly yves.bai...@sescoi.fr wrote:
Le 13/12/2013 08:50, Michael Sué a écrit :
I think support for VS 2010
What do you mean? We use VS 2012 on Win 7 to target Windows XP. It was
earlier not supported in RC release but added it in VS 2012 update 1. More
information can be found here
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vcblog/archive/2012/11/26/visual-studio-2012-update-1-now-available.aspx
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at
We were using VS 2005 until last year for a very large solution. Now we
moved to VS 2012. Most probably company will not upgrade VS for the next
5-6 years. Microsoft is releasing too fast.
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
On quinta-feira, 12
Hi,
What do you mean? We use VS 2012 on Win 7 to target Windows XP. It was
earlier not supported in RC release but added it in VS 2012 update 1. More
information can be found here
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vcblog/archive/2012/11/26/visual-studio-2012-update-1-now-available.aspx
With native
If you want to take advantage of newer hardware, OS, compilers to improve
development you will need to move at some point of time and should be
before support ends from them :).
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Michael Sué s...@nf.mpg.de wrote:
Hi,
What do you mean? We use VS 2012 on Win 7
Hi,
If you want to take advantage of newer hardware, OS, compilers to improve
development you will need to move at some point of time and should be before
support ends from them :).
I completely agree :-) But on the other side there are the users of software
(e.g. our software) who want to
I think a lot of us windows guys want to move over to VS2013 (optimization
bugs in VS2012 and all).
Unfortunately, VS2013 wasnt released in time to have full support in Qt 5.2.
VS2013 has been around for a while now, and code to update the VSAddon to
support VS2013 has been reviewed, approved and
On quinta-feira, 12 de dezembro de 2013 21:17:56, Felix morack wrote:
I think a lot of us windows guys want to move over to VS2013 (optimization
bugs in VS2012 and all).
Unfortunately, VS2013 wasnt released in time to have full support in Qt 5.2.
VS2013 has been around for a while now, and
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
Would people feel bad if we no longer provided binaries for VS 2010?
Many people are still on VS2010 (in fact, I know a not-negligible amount of
companies still on VS 2008)
Microsoft is releasing too fast for
Why would you need to drop something else?
But yes, i think moving forward is more important than keeping VS2010
support.
So what are the current plans?
2013/12/12 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
On quinta-feira, 12 de dezembro de 2013 21:17:56, Felix morack wrote:
I think a lot
Would people feel bad if we no longer provided binaries for VS 2010?
Many people are still on VS2010 (in fact, I know a not-negligible amount
of companies still on VS 2008)
Microsoft is releasing too fast for the mid to large corporation.
Very true. In fact, i work for one such
Would people feel bad if we no longer provided binaries for VS 2010?
Many people are still on VS2010 (in fact, I know a not-negligible amount
of companies still on VS 2008)
Microsoft is releasing too fast for the mid to large corporation.
Felix spaketh:
Very true. In fact, i work for one
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Charley Bay charleyb...@gmail.com wrote:
MSVC2013 is an exception because IMHO, MSVC2010 and MSVC2012 had
serious deficiencies (we won't use them).
Careful with that: LLVM is sticking to MSVC2010 for now because they found
some serious issues in 2012 and
On quinta-feira, 12 de dezembro de 2013 22:22:56, Felix morack wrote:
Why would you need to drop something else?
Because we don't have enough manpower to test all the packages that people ask
for.
Let me put it this way: there will be MSVC2013 packages if there are people
testing them. Join
Deal!
I am sure we can gather enough people for testing a msvc2013 package. I'll
subs. to the release slit momentarily.
Any ideas when we can expect 5.2.1?
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
Hi,
I think support for VS 2010 should be held up as long as WINDOWS XP is
officially supported (April 2014). The newer VS versions do not support native
development on WINDOWS XP but this will stop to be an issue as soon as the
platform does no longer exist.
- Michael.
Le 13/12/2013 08:50, Michael Sué a écrit :
I think support for VS 2010 should be held up as long as WINDOWS XP is
officially supported (April 2014). The newer VS versions do not support
native development on WINDOWS XP but this will stop to be an issue as soon as
the platform does no longer
18 matches
Mail list logo
