On 05/03/2012 01:17 AM, Stephen Bryant wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday 02 May 2012 21:41:33 Harri Pasanen wrote:
[...]
Binary compatibility with phones/tablets is more than just CPU. As soon
as you start accessing Camera, GPS, etc. you typically need to test on
device. Screen resolution,
On May 2, 2012, at 8:37 PM, ext Nicola De Filippo wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
However, you must expect binary compatibility problems in the future.
Intel is looking to grab a share of the market, and remember also that MIPS
got themselves Android certified before Intel did. There may also be
Hi,
Hi,
in the company there's Qt Vs phonegap (and other web-runtime).
I'm obviously biased. What are the objective points in favor of Qt? I can
not say anything about the Windows and Android we are not yet stable.
The native binary that you compile when using Qt will give much better
Intel has the x86 Andoid problem fixed with binary translation. Your NDK
arguments are moot.
From: Stephen Bryant st...@bawue.de
To: interest@qt-project.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 6:05 AM
Subject: Re: [Interest] qt vs web-runtime
Hi
On 05/02/2012 09:41 PM, Harri Pasanen wrote:
On 05/02/2012 12:05 PM, Stephen Bryant wrote:
Hi,
in the company there's Qt Vs phonegap (and other web-runtime).
I forgot to mention this discussion which is quite enlightening:
Hi,
On Wednesday 02 May 2012 10:44:36 Jason H wrote:
Intel has the x86 Andoid problem fixed with binary translation. Your NDK
arguments are moot.
I disagree.
Firstly, Intel's binary translator won't help those with MIPS devices.
Secondly, it doesn't work with all apps. Here's a quote from
Hi,
On Wednesday 02 May 2012 21:41:33 Harri Pasanen wrote:
[...]
Binary compatibility with phones/tablets is more than just CPU. As soon
as you start accessing Camera, GPS, etc. you typically need to test on
device. Screen resolution, GPUs , RAM, storage memory all differ, so
even if you
