Re: [Interest] Managing memory with QObject*-models exposed to QML

Ola Røer Thorsen wrote: > My worry here is that deleteLater() is sometimes still too soon for the > QML engine to keep up, especially when there is a lot of things going on > in the Quick scene. Or if there is an animation for item removal. > Could this be the case? If so, what is the

Re: [Interest] Managing memory with QObject*-models exposed to QML

On 17 July 2016 at 19:22, Ola Røer Thorsen wrote: > Thank you for the feedback, Ben. > > 2016-07-15 19:32 GMT+02:00 Ben Lau : > >> Hi, >> >> In my humble opinion, QObjectListModel is a bad idea. Because it is >> difficult to manage the life cycle of

Re: [Interest] Managing memory with QObject*-models exposed to QML

Thank you for the feedback, Ben. 2016-07-15 19:32 GMT+02:00 Ben Lau : > Hi, > > In my humble opinion, QObjectListModel is a bad idea. Because it is > difficult to manage the life cycle of QObject with QML. Just like your > problem. I have met the similar issue in my first QML

Re: [Interest] Managing memory with QObject*-models exposed to QML

Hi, In my humble opinion, QObjectListModel is a bad idea. Because it is difficult to manage the life cycle of QObject with QML. Just like your problem. I have met the similar issue in my first QML project. The application always crashes. The pattern is purely random. I wasted a lot of time to