Re: [Interest] Building 5.12 on macOS 10.12.6

If anyone else was having this problem, it's been fixed by Timur: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-70757 https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/241268/ --- Andy Maloney // https://asmaloney.com twitter ~ @asmaloney On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 9:22 AM Tony

Re: [Interest] Porting Qt to our RTOS

Hi, On 28/09/18 10:55, Uwe Rathmann wrote: This is another blatant false statement, because you can port just the parts of Qt that you need, and even those can be further trimmed down using the feature system. (That's actually how you would do a port in the first place.) While I agree with

Re: [Interest] Porting Qt to our RTOS

On 29/09/18 23:45, Roland Hughes wrote: Roland, consider yourself on notice. Your comment about OpenZinc was fine -- even if it is a competitor, telling people about their options is the right thing to do. You can relate your experience with Qt and where things did not satisfy you. But you

Re: [Interest] Porting Qt to our RTOS

On 29/09/18 23:35, Roland Hughes wrote: Syllogism, nice word. For those who did not wish to look it up [snip] Thank you, but I assume that people reading this mailing list are smart enough to look up the words that they don't know, or ask me directly for an explanation. Logic A form of

Re: [Interest] Porting Qt to our RTOS

On 9/29/18 11:45 PM, Roland Hughes wrote: I'm returning there for a few months to participate in a re-evaluation process. They are considering ditching Qt for Electron. Doing side by side development on all platforms to see which works best for them. When we stumble into one of those