Hi
I have a dialog with a QTextEdit element. I have not implemented any extra
functionality and find that I can cut formatted text from the Qt TextEdit demo
and paste it into my TextEdit widget.
However, this does not work for images, so my question is - what do I have to
do in order to be able
Thanks Diego
Kind regards,
Sujan Dasmahapatra
Project Leader, Aero Group
CE - Aero Group
Tel+91 80 66470248
Mob
s...@lmwindpower.com mailto:%25EMAIL%25
LM Wind Power Blades
lmwindpower.com
Together we capture the wind to power a cleaner world
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:35:15 -0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
A device with limited resources but powerful enough that rasterising SVG
on the fly isn't an issue?
It is - but as our layouts are fix during the runtime of the application
this only has to be done once. Later the icons are taken from
Thanks. I never would have found this!
From: gareth.stockw...@accenture.com gareth.stockw...@accenture.com
To: scorp...@yahoo.com; interest@qt-project.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:26 AM
Subject: RE: [Interest] Deplying QML apps to Android (Qt 4.8)
These are all good reasons why a fast, light implementation of SvgTiny
is a really good idea. And we have one, and it works well for the kind
of simple GUI graphics that show up in touch interfaces and on toolbars.
So I ask again: What's the process for lobbying to keep QtSvg as a
supported
Hi,
A few years ago everybody in KDE was sure WebKit was going to replace
QtSVG for SVG rendering. It was assumed WebKit would be better for
SVG.
Then someone (Ariya?) actually experimented and compared QtSVG,
WebKit, librsvg and some more (AntiGrain?). Surprisingly The result
was WebKit was
On 11.01.12 08:11:19, Martin Holmes wrote:
These are all good reasons why a fast, light implementation of SvgTiny
is a really good idea. And we have one,
No you don't. You have something which tries to implement Svg Tiny, but
apparently is not complete or bug-free.
and it works well for the
You bring up a good point. If we moved to the lib with qt wrappers, maybe as a
qt plugin we'd keep everyone happy and qtsvg could die.
-J
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
You bring up a good point. If we moved to the lib with qt wrappers, maybe as a
qt plugin we'd keep everyone happy and qtsvg could die.
-J
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:05:40 -0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Can't you pre-rasterise the files and store them on the device's image?
Sounds like a much better solution to me.
The sizes of the icons are the result of the calculation of QLayouts - I
don't know them in advance. They might even
On Wednesday, 11 de January de 2012 17.33.22, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 11.01.12 08:11:19, Martin Holmes wrote:
These are all good reasons why a fast, light implementation of SvgTiny
is a really good idea. And we have one,
No you don't. You have something which tries to implement Svg
On 12-01-11 08:33 AM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 11.01.12 08:11:19, Martin Holmes wrote:
These are all good reasons why a fast, light implementation of SvgTiny
is a really good idea. And we have one,
No you don't. You have something which tries to implement Svg Tiny, but
apparently is not
On Wednesday, 11 de January de 2012 09.08.46, Martin Holmes wrote:
A couple of people have already suggested that they might help. I don't
have the graphics skills myself. But I was wondering whether we could
make the case to the Nokia/Qt team themselves that they should
un-deprecate it.
2012/1/11 Uwe Rathmann uwe.rathm...@tigertal.de:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:35:15 -0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
A device with limited resources but powerful enough that rasterising SVG
on the fly isn't an issue?
It is - but as our layouts are fix during the runtime of the application
this only
On Wednesday, 11 de January de 2012 15.34.34, Alex Malyushytskyy wrote:
No you don't. You have something which tries to implement Svg Tiny, but
apparently is not complete or bug-free.
I believe you are wrong.
Check discussion above and there was a statement that it is considered
Complete
15 matches
Mail list logo
