Re: [Interest] [OS X] creating a QDialog from a WId?

Yes, I’m writing a plugin and the ptr is a NSView provided by the host. I had already tried several other options until I found QMacNativeWidget to the rescue. It works like charm now. Sorry, I don’t know what KF5 is. Nuno > On 09/12/2015, at 00:05, René J. V. Bertin

Re: [Interest] [Qt3D] Camera controller

Hi, On Wednesday 09 Dec 2015 08:54:58 Nye wrote: > Hello Sean, > > So I've implemented my simple camera controller. Before going into the > detailed text, here is how I set it up: > http://codepad.org/mXiL5Rs7 > and then what I do in the controller itself: > http://codepad.org/9oARCaOv > > The

Re: [Interest] [OS X] creating a QDialog from a WId?

On Wednesday December 09 2015 08:30:44 Nuno Santos wrote: Hi! >Yes, I’m writing a plugin and the ptr is a NSView provided by the host. That's not a different application! Plugins are loaded by what's indeed called a host application, but afterwards their code executes in the address space of

Re: [Interest] New CI for Qt (and OpenSource Qt/QtC 3rd parties)

What's missing are any comment from Qt on its new CI and the specs behind it. That would have been a great topic during Qt World 2015. md On 12/9/2015 3:31 AM, Ch'Gans wrote: >I think it will be difficult for the Qt project to support all third party

Re: [Interest] [Qt3D] Camera controller

Hello, I don't know how much you're open to "larger" changes, but I'd like to argue my case further, if you'd bear with me a bit more. >This is the Chords feature I mentioned in my earlier email. At the moment any >of the ActionInputs trigger the containing action to be fired. I'm planning on

[Interest] `pkg-config --cflags Qt5Gui Qt5Widgets Qt5Core` with Qt 5.4.2 on Yosemite

After installing qt-opensource-mac-x64-clang-5.4.2.dmg (size:616,135,300 bytes) and setting export PKG_CONFIG_PATH="/usr/local/Qt5.4.2/5.4/clang_64/lib/pkgconfig:${PKG_CONFIG_PATH}" in .bash_profile, I am expecting that typing pkg-config --cflags Qt5Gui Qt5Widgets Qt5Core

Re: [Interest] [Development] Qt 5.7 feature freeze postponed, new date to be agreed

Tuuka: I was looking around for "Coin CI" information on google. Can you provide links and additional insight into this CI? We have a thread on the interest list related to CI. md On 12/9/2015 9:58 AM, Turunen Tuukka wrote: Hi, 15th Jan sounds good to me as the new FF time for Qt 5.7.

Re: [Interest] `pkg-config --cflags Qt5Gui Qt5Widgets Qt5Core` with Qt 5.4.2 on Yosemite

On Wednesday 09 December 2015 12:10:09 Sherif Ghali wrote: > Where should I be looking to fix this problem? I'm on OS X 10.10.5 > (Yosemite). It's a bug in the generated pkg-config files because no one tests or uses them on OS X. We barely test them on Linux where frameworks don't exist... --

[Interest] Qt 5.6+ WebView

Hi, I have a question, I known that WebKit will no more be part of Qt, but I was woundering what will happen with WebView into Qml? - will it be removed? - Do we have to compile WebKit on the side to make it work? - Is it Chromium that replace it? I'm trying to plan what to do with it,

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.6+ WebView

09.12.2015, 21:27, "Jérôme Godbout" : > Hi, > I have a question, I known that WebKit will no more be part of Qt, but I was > woundering what will happen with WebView into Qml? > > * will it be removed? > * Do we have to compile WebKit on the side to make it work? > * Is it 

Re: [Interest] [Qt3D] Camera controller

Hello again, I've run some more extensive tests regarding the action's signals and here is what I gather from that. It seems that even if I don't release the mouse key at all I get a actionFinished signal fired, not sure why. Here's an example from my code (I just print out in the debug the slot's

[Interest] MenuContentItem.qml Acccessible is not defined

Hi, We are trying to move to Qt 5.5 (were in Qt5.3.0 before). We are creating our own style and replacing the Controls style and I end up with this error: Qt55/msvc2015_64_opengl/qml/QtQuick/Controls/Private/MenuContentItem.qml:178: ReferenceError: Acccessible is not defined This is weird, since

Re: [Interest] MenuContentItem.qml Acccessible is not defined

Hi, I believe you are running into https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-47847. You can fix simply by fixing the typo (“Accessible”, not “Acccessible”) in MenuContentItem.qml. Mike From: Interest [mailto:interest-boun...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Jérôme Godbout Sent: Wednesday, December

Re: [Interest] New CI for Qt (and OpenSource Qt/QtC 3rd parties)

El Wednesday 09 December 2015, Ch'Gans escribió: > Could you elaborate on this Qt Installer Framework repository, maybe > just send a link? Now I don't remember much about this topic in the documentation of the Qt Installer Framework, but some time ago when I used it for a project, I got the

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.6+ WebView

On Wednesday 09 December 2015 21:28:52 Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > 09.12.2015, 21:27, "Jérôme Godbout" : > > Hi, > > I have a question, I known that WebKit will no more be part of Qt, but I > > was woundering what will happen with WebView into Qml? > > > > * will it be

Re: [Interest] [Development] Qt 5.7 feature freeze postponed, new date to be agreed

Hi, A blog post is in the works, but not yet published. Now we have been focusing to get the Qt 5.6 beta out. We have not changed how Qt is built, codereview or the HW of CI, it is only the CI SW side that is renewed. Yours, -- Tuukka "m...@rpzdesign.com"

Re: [Interest] New CI for Qt (and OpenSource Qt/QtC 3rd parties)

>Because the original question is to explore the NEW CI that the Qt Company dev >team has chosen and understand it. I too would like to learn about the Qt move to a new CI system. Has Qt moved away from Jenkins to a Puppet based system? https://puppetlabs.com/puppet/what-is-puppet -Ed But

Re: [Interest] New CI for Qt (and OpenSource Qt/QtC 3rd parties)

Why not using Qt with CMake and Jenkins CI? With this combination you could also use non Qt related projects. Best Regards > Am 09.12.2015 um 14:26 schrieb "rpzrpz...@gmail.com" : > > What's missing are any comment from Qt on its new CI and the specs behind it. > > That

Re: [Interest] New CI for Qt (and OpenSource Qt/QtC 3rd parties)

Because the original question is to explore the NEW CI that the Qt Company dev team has chosen and understand it. But other suggestions improve awareness as well. md On 12/9/2015 11:41 AM, NoRulez wrote: Why not using Qt with CMake and Jenkins CI? With this combination you could also use non