Re: [Interest] Building Qt 5.5.1 on CentOS 5

2016-03-12 Thread Simon Matthews
How practical would it be to remove the signalfd code from 5.5.1?

Simon



From: Interest on behalf of Thiago Macieira
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 5:08 PM
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] Building Qt 5.5.1 on CentOS 5

On sexta-feira, 11 de março de 2016 16:32:13 PST Simon Matthews wrote:
> I am trying to build Qt 5.5.1 on CentOS 5. I suspect that we don't need
> linuxfb, but there doesn't seem to be an easy way to skip this.

Upgrade to 5.6, the signalfd code has been removed.

Also, fix your libc. The source file compiled, which means that sys/signalfd.h
exists, but the signalfd function is missing. That means your glibc
installation is broken (headers don't match library).

--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest


Re: [Interest] Building Qt 5.5.1 on CentOS 5

2016-03-12 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 11 de março de 2016 16:32:13 PST Simon Matthews wrote:
> I am trying to build Qt 5.5.1 on CentOS 5. I suspect that we don't need 
> linuxfb, but there doesn't seem to be an easy way to skip this.

Upgrade to 5.6, the signalfd code has been removed.

Also, fix your libc. The source file compiled, which means that sys/signalfd.h 
exists, but the signalfd function is missing. That means your glibc 
installation is broken (headers don't match library).

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest