Hello,
Il 08/02/19 15:19, rol...@logikalsolutions.com ha scritto:
While it would be awesome if QtCreator could let it be
completely arbitrary as Sublime does:
"rulers": [80, 100, 120],
"word_wrap": true,
"wrap_width": 120
It would be nice to be able set 2 with the farthest one being the wrap
> Well there's always QSettings::registerFormat (
> https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qsettings.html#registerFormat )
>
> Haven't tried it myself but it will give you a QSettings::SettingsMap
> which means you'll still have to serialize out it yourself to a QString,
> but at least you can get rid of the
On 2019-02-08 23:56, Murphy, Sean wrote:
Hi, just tested your example program in MSVC 2017 Qt 5.12.1 and it fails
as well.
But a simple fix is just to make sure that the QFile file isn't open at
the same time as you write out the settings to it.
I.e. in your example program, it suffices to move
> Hi, just tested your example program in MSVC 2017 Qt 5.12.1 and it fails
> as well.
>
> But a simple fix is just to make sure that the QFile file isn't open at
> the same time as you write out the settings to it.
> I.e. in your example program, it suffices to move that first
> file.close(); up
On 2019-02-08 14:46, Murphy, Sean wrote:
I'm porting an old application from Qt 5.3.2 to Qt 5.9.6 (yeah, I know, we're a
lot behind...). I'm running into an issue where code we had that was writing
out settings via the QSettings constructor that takes a file name doesn't work
anymore. I've
>
> [...]
> I do appreciate the open discussion style on this list. I even do
> appreciate a somewhat harsh style, if it has a factual base and is
> getting straight to the point instead of b*s*ing around. But those
> lengthy wallpapers our President of Logikal solutions commonly utters,
> have
Yep. Why don't we use our Code of Conduct here?
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/243623/
On 2/8/19, 6:47 PM, "Interest on behalf of m...@herrdiel.de"
wrote:
"All",
somebody who calls a whole platform "idiot" lacks any respect for those
who work in that field. Doing so
"All",
somebody who calls a whole platform "idiot" lacks any respect for those
who work in that field. Doing so repetetively whenever mentioning
"phones", is not a slip of the keyboard but is done intentional - which
puts the author in the very vincinity of his own vocabulary.
I don't want to
All,
Slightly off topic but still relevant, if Qt cares even slightly about
still being used in the embedded world. If all they care about are
idiot phones and that declining market, I guess this doesn't matter.
https://barrgroup.com/Embedded-Systems/Books/Embedded-C-Coding-Standard
I'm porting an old application from Qt 5.3.2 to Qt 5.9.6 (yeah, I know, we're a
lot behind...). I'm running into an issue where code we had that was writing
out settings via the QSettings constructor that takes a file name doesn't work
anymore. I've attached a fairly minimal example that shows
10 matches
Mail list logo
