On Thursday, 21 February 2019 13:47:05 PST Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> (Uh...why? I am not particularly amused by the loss of precision, nor
> the extremely subtle incompatibility.)
Changed in commit 51d40d7e9bdfc63c5109aef5b732aa2ba10f985a:
http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/commit/?
So... after a full day of debugging, trying to port my Qt4 app to Qt5
and chase down a nasty case of stack clobbering, I discovered that the
problem is that QMatrix4x4 changed from qreal to float.
(Uh...why? I am not particularly amused by the loss of precision, nor
the extremely subtle
Hi,
Does anyone know about plans for a Vulkan back-end for Qt3D?
Looks like there was some work started in the past (
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/196945/ ) that was abandoned since.
Thanks!
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
Hi,
the two functions qVariantFromValue() and qVariantSetValue() are
deprecated but the replacements QVariant::setValue() / fromValue() are
using exactly those two functions...
Those two functions are some of the last obsolete functions which did
not yet get decorated with QT_DEPRECATED but
Do you have one example of someone who put a LGPL app in the app store and
provided the binary object files?
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 3:58 PM Julius Bullinger
wrote:
> On 21.02.2019 15:44, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> > Qt is free (on mobile), free as in liberty, as long as your
> > application
This is definitely a sa...@qt.io question, but if both companies have the same developers, then I don't see why they would need two licenses?
It's an uncommon case that could be considered a loophole, as it's licensed per developer. The question is, is they key (company, person) or (person).
I have 2 LLC companies in the US. The company is only my own. If my two
companies sell my own QT development software in the future, can I use only
one of the company subscriptions?
Of course, because of the pressure of life, I don’t consider buying now,
but if I complete the development, I will
Well, this was my question here.
What makes you think, you violate the LGPL in this case?
>You *cannot* publish (for free or at a cost) Qt based proprietary SW
>on Google play store w/o a Qt license. It would violate the LGPL. The
>Qt license is a (costly) LGPL substitute.
>
>Chris
>
>
>
>>
>>
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 03:56, Julius Bullinger
wrote:
>
> On 21.02.2019 15:44, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> > Qt is free (on mobile), free as in liberty, as long as your
> > application is free, as in liberty.
> > That's basic (L)GPL rules.
> >
> > Now there's the business rules:
> > If you want
On 21.02.2019 15:44, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
Qt is free (on mobile), free as in liberty, as long as your
application is free, as in liberty.
That's basic (L)GPL rules.
Now there's the business rules:
If you want your (mobile) app to be non-free (as in proprietary), then
you'll have to pay
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 02:53, René Hansen wrote:
>
> You're reversing the burden of proof here. Where have Qt stated that it is
> non-free for mobile?
>
> The licensing terms are the same no matter the platform; Qt is LGPL or
> Commercial. It's up to you to adhere to whichever license you
So there are only three licences:
LGPL
Commercial
Commercial Runtime (Boot2Qt)
IANAL, but the dynamic/static linking debate is not even settled, even in court. I would say that the spirit of LGPL and existing precedent is that under LGPL you can't modify Qt without releasing it. If you
Thou shall not use sellers opinion as legal correct advice:)
qt.io tends to hide facts and even post wrong "facts"...
Am February 21, 2019 1:49:21 PM UTC schrieb Sylvain Pointeau
:
>On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 8:30 PM Sylvain Pointeau
>
>wrote:
>
>> Qt is free on desktop, but it is not free on
As you said, look at the license:)
You may git clone qt, read the LGPL license, accept it, and deploy your Android
app.
Just as you do with other LGPL code.
What else official do you need?
Yesterday i found worth reading:
https://wiki.qt.io/Licensing-talk-about-mobile-platforms
Am February
You're reversing the burden of proof here. Where have Qt stated that it is
non-free for mobile?
The licensing terms are the same no matter the platform; Qt is LGPL or
Commercial. It's up to you to adhere to whichever license you choose to
utilise.
/René
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 14:50 Sylvain
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 8:30 PM Sylvain Pointeau
wrote:
> Qt is free on desktop, but it is not free on mobile, which is a real
> showstopper for me and many others.
>
> Le mar. 19 févr. 2019 à 20:12, ich a écrit :
>
>> Qt is free, too.
>>
>
I received few personal emails to ask me why am I
> -Original Message-
> From: Interest On Behalf Of Christian
> Kandeler
> Sent: Tuesday, 19 February 2019 9:42 AM
> To: interest@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Interest] Odd behaviour when organizing .qml files into folders
>
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 15:01:47 -0500
> Furkan Üzümcü wrote:
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
