Re: [Interest] Ashamed bug :)

Le sam. 4 sept. 2021 à 00:14, Thiago Macieira a écrit : > On Friday, 3 September 2021 14:04:01 PDT David M. Cotter wrote: > > there's also the rather daunting barrier to entry for folks who COULD fix > > it: > > > > getting the qt sources on your local computer, getting them to compile, > >

Re: [Interest] L Word

Le lun. 3 mai 2021 à 17:36, Matthew Woehlke a écrit : > On 29/04/2021 15.24, Ben Haller via Interest wrote: > > If I'm not mistaken, not a single person has posted to this "L Word" > > thread in defense of Roland's right to act as he has been acting, > > have they? > Given that we live in a

Re: [Interest] L Word

Easy solution: create the rol...@qt-projet.org list and send him and his (surely numerous) followers there. Think "separation of concerns" rather than "ban" Le jeu. 29 avr. 2021 à 13:46, Tuukka Turunen a écrit : > Hi, > > > > Perhaps we have been too long tolerant for the behavior that many see

Re: [Interest] L Word

The other part of the problem is that he doesn't come from the world of well-adjusted, well-behaved people. This could answer your question. Le jeu. 29 avr. 2021 à 12:05, Bernhard Lindner a écrit : > The main problem isn't trolling. The main problem is: Roland comes from a > completely >

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.15 pull out of open source?!

Le jeu. 7 janv. 2021 à 18:30, Benjamin TERRIER a écrit : > > So basically for open source users the support of Qt 5.15 has stopped 9 > months before a usable version should be available. > Totally agree, but that point has already been made in the dev mailing list. So we can assume that Tuuka

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt, Commercial developers

Hi, What I get from the explanations from Tuukka is that the commercial contract includes what amounts to legal carpet-bombing aiming to prevent bad faith actors to use loopholes to their advantage. The unfortunate consequence is that good faith actors can feel unsafe if they try to read the

Re: [Interest] Licensing

It would maybe be useful to clarify what his mistake is ? >From what I understand Uwe mixes "contributing to open source project" and "using open source Qt for a closed project". In the former case, of course he's welcome to buy commercial licences for whatever project he'll be working on. In the

Re: [Interest] JS numbers to qint64

2017-07-12 12:00 GMT+02:00 Konrad Rosenbaum : > On Wed, July 12, 2017 11:53, Shantanu Tushar wrote: > > and I see this output- > > > > qml: Opening 5762702576189441 > > Opening 5762702576189442 > > > > As you can see the number changes. What am I doing wrong? > > ...you are

Re: [Interest] Moving from Parse

inando.pt>: > Ilya, > > Yes, there are a lot of Parse Server hosting options now. Which provider > have you chosen? Or are you hosting your own server? > > Thanks, > > Nuno > > On 29 Mar 2016, at 09:16, Ilya Diallo <ilya.dia...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > >

Re: [Interest] Moving from Parse

Hi, I use Parse Server , and this C++/QML client lib . There's tons of Parse Server hosting options available, and the Qt client lib has served me well for getting data from the (also retiring) Qt Cloud

Re: [Interest] QtScript to QJSEngine migration

Hi Julien, A long thread on this list last march on this subject was concluded by an answer from Frederik Gladhorn (copy below). For now (5.5), the best is probably to postpone your migration if you want to avoid unofficial workarounds. QtScript is not going anywhere until feature parity is (more

Re: [Interest] double-buffering, quality drop

Not sure it's related, but that reminds me of that old issue: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-25896 ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Re: [Interest] Report designer for Qt

Hi Muhammad, Feel free to ask me if you have questions about OpenRPT (code or usage). The docs are a little bit outdated, some features are not listed. And please tell me if you start a Qt 5 port, i was planning to work on it too. Ilya. 2013/4/8 Muhammad Bashir Al-Noimi mbno...@gmail.com On

Re: [Interest] Report designer

2013/1/5 M. Bashir Al-Noimi mbno...@gmail.com On 04/01/2013 10:42 م, M. Bashir Al-Noimi wrote: Well I used OpenRPT before with PostBooks and it has two problems: 1. It works with Postgresql only (I think). No, it works with other databases as well. It can even work without any external

Re: [Interest] Report designer

Hi, NCReport is a commercial product. For a well tested open source tool, see for instance OpenRPT (http://www.xtuple.com/openrpt). NB OpenRPT is now bundled in the xTuple ERP installer, but you can select only the standalone OpenRPT during the install. Ilya. 2013/1/3 Tony Rietwyk