On 11.06.2012 23:06, Thiago Macieira wrote:
They'll just have worse code generated. But if they're using compilers that
are 3 years old or more, it's their own fault.
Most embedded systems can use GCC 4.6 or even 4.7. Certainly the most common
processors can.
Well, I think it doesn't matter
On 6/11/12 10:49 PM, Rohan McGovern wrote:
Stephen Chu said:
I just pulled Qt 5 from git and don't see the new C++11 option. They are
in the master branch of qtbase but Qt 5 doesn't pull that in yet.
Right, that's actually because it appears to have caused a few
regressions. The new qtbase
On 6/12/12 5:12 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On terça-feira, 12 de junho de 2012 15.16.38, Stephen Chu wrote:
I am curious if the runtime issue on OS X has been dealt with?
Yes. We decided not to force libc++. We're still using the compiler default,
whichever that is (currently libstdc++). If
http://woboq.com/blog/cpp11-in-qt5.html
Can someone part of the Qt project, explain the reasoning for this...
While in general I love the idea... In specific, I have had customers
that are 5-10 years behind in their compiler choice..
Usually in the embedded world, where the processor
On Jun 11, 2012, at 4:35 PM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
http://woboq.com/blog/cpp11-in-qt5.html
Can someone part of the Qt project, explain the reasoning for this…
While in general I love the idea… In specific, I have had customers that are
5-10 years behind in their compiler choice..
On 11 June 2012 21:35, Scott Aron Bloom scott.bl...@onshorecs.com wrote:
Can someone part of the Qt project, explain the reasoning for this…
While in general I love the idea… In specific, I have had customers that are
5-10 years behind in their compiler choice..
Usually in the embedded
On 06/11/2012 09:52 PM, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
I think there's a misunderstanding: C++11 support IS NOT required to
use or build Qt 5. If you have a recent compiler and enable C++11
support in Qt, then you get those nice extra features. Otherwise you
don't. But you can still use Qt 5 without
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] C++11 in Qt5
On segunda-feira, 11 de junho de 2012 13.35.56, Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
http://woboq.com/blog/cpp11-in-qt5.html
Can someone part of the Qt project, explain the reasoning for this...
While in general I love the idea
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Rui Maciel rui.mac...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/11/2012 09:52 PM, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
I think there's a misunderstanding: C++11 support IS NOT required to
use or build Qt 5. If you have a recent compiler and enable C++11
support in Qt, then you get
12.06.2012, 01:49, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com:
You cannot build Qt with GCC 2.4.
Well, with 2.95 it's possible (after some patching)
--
Regards,
Konstantin
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
On terça-feira, 12 de junho de 2012 02.06.35, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
12.06.2012, 01:49, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com:
You cannot build Qt with GCC 2.4.
Well, with 2.95 it's possible (after some patching)
Completely unsupported. Qt 4.0 was released with minimum support of 3.2 and
-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] C++11 in Qt5
You cannot build Qt with GCC 2.4.
On 12/06/12 00:19, Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
I would say almost all NEW embedded systems..
However, I can tell you, I had a client last year stuck on gcc 2.4, because
the CPU vendor who put out the gcc tool chain
Stephen Chu said:
I just pulled Qt 5 from git and don't see the new C++11 option. They are
in the master branch of qtbase but Qt 5 doesn't pull that in yet.
Right, that's actually because it appears to have caused a few
regressions. The new qtbase will only arrive in qt5's git once all
known
13 matches
Mail list logo
