Re: [Interest] Linking issues with Angle and Qt 5.12.x

Hi Frederico, This indeed looks like a problem. I will create a patch for Qt tomorrow. (new functions that were introduced by the ANGLE update have to be added to the def file from 5.9). Thanks for pointing that out and for the time spent on investigating the problem. Olli On 28/05/2019

Re: [Interest] Linking issues with Angle and Qt 5.12.x

Hi all. Maybe I'm wrong - that's not exactly my cup of tea here - but I've noticed something that feels off to me. The def file included in Qt 5.9.x for the exported functions seems to

Re: [Interest] Linking issues with Angle and Qt 5.12.x

An update. We used chroot from Archlinux and repos which provides a patched ANGLE, as seen here , and it worked like a charm. We were able to compile qnanopainter and

Re: [Interest] Linking issues with Angle and Qt 5.12.x

Hi Vadim, Thanks for the reply. No, quite sure we are not mixing packages in MXE. Compilation is forced for 32 bit target only. On native Windows we are using plain Qt 5.12.x from qt.io so there everything should be correctly aligned too. F. On Mon, 27 May 2019 at 13:11, Vadim Peretokin wrote:

Re: [Interest] Linking issues with Angle and Qt 5.12.x

Hi Oliver. Thanks for the reply. At the moment our example is just "compile qnanopainter" since it's what gave us the radically different results between 5.9.x and 5.12.x in the first place. Just in case I've also opened an issue in qnanopainter because something can be off there too. I remember

Re: [Interest] Linking issues with Angle and Qt 5.12.x

Are you mixing 64bit and 32bit libraries by accident during linking? I had similar messages in that scenario. On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 12:57 PM Oliver Wolff wrote: > Hi Frederico, > > I am not aware of an issue with ANGLE when using MinGW. Can you create a > bug report on

Re: [Interest] Linking issues with Angle and Qt 5.12.x

Hi Frederico, I am not aware of an issue with ANGLE when using MinGW. Can you create a bug report on http://bugreports.qt.io/ ,attach a minimal example, and assign it to me so that it does not get lost? Olli On 25/05/2019 17:47, Federico Buti wrote: > Hi all. > > We are facing a quite

[Interest] Linking issues with Angle and Qt 5.12.x

Hi all. We are facing a quite strange behaviour with qnanopainter . Building/running the library and the examples works smoothly on Qt 5.9.8 and no issue is found. I guess everything was fixed there, see for instance here