: Interest <interest-boun...@qt-project.org> on behalf of René Hansen <ren...@gmail.com>Date: Monday, February 11, 2019 at 10:16 AMTo: Jason H <jh...@gmx.com>Cc: Qt Interest <interest@qt-project.org>Subject: Re: [Interest] Netiquette [was: Feature Request - QtCreator - Multiple ri
replies. I would not bring in the
CoC just yet.
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2019 at 8:18 PM
> From: "Konstantin Shegunov"
> To: m...@herrdiel.de
> Cc: "Interests Qt"
> Subject: Re: [Interest] Netiquette [was: Feature Request - QtCreator -
> Multiple r
top getting replies. I would
> not bring in the CoC just yet.
>
> > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2019 at 8:18 PM
> > From: "Konstantin Shegunov"
> > To: m...@herrdiel.de
> > Cc: "Interests Qt"
> > Subject: Re: [Interest] Netiquette [was: Feature R
you fall below zero, you stop getting replies. I would not bring in the
CoC just yet.
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2019 at 8:18 PM
> From: "Konstantin Shegunov"
> To: m...@herrdiel.de
> Cc: "Interests Qt"
> Subject: Re: [Interest] Netiquette [was: Feature Requ
Sebastian,
Thanks for this delightful answer.
I totally agree with your points and I couldn’t have them exposed better myself.
You are not alone!
Best regards,
Nuno
PS: isn’t a mobile device a embedded device anyway? XD
> On 8 Feb 2019, at 17:44, m...@herrdiel.de wrote:
>
> "All",
>
>
>
> [...]
> I do appreciate the open discussion style on this list. I even do
> appreciate a somewhat harsh style, if it has a factual base and is
> getting straight to the point instead of b*s*ing around. But those
> lengthy wallpapers our President of Logikal solutions commonly utters,
> have
Yep. Why don't we use our Code of Conduct here?
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/243623/
On 2/8/19, 6:47 PM, "Interest on behalf of m...@herrdiel.de"
wrote:
"All",
somebody who calls a whole platform "idiot" lacks any respect for those
who work in that field. Doing so
"All",
somebody who calls a whole platform "idiot" lacks any respect for those
who work in that field. Doing so repetetively whenever mentioning
"phones", is not a slip of the keyboard but is done intentional - which
puts the author in the very vincinity of his own vocabulary.
I don't want to
