Von: Daniel Bowen qtmailingli...@bowensite.com
An: interest@qt-project.org
Betreff: Re: [Interest] Size of libQt5Core in 5.3
Thanks again for the info.
Here's where I've gotten to so far.
Starting from the last ./configure command line I mentioned, plus
-no-feature- for every
On 13.05.2014 00:01, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Em seg 12 maio 2014, às 23:55:27, Peter Kümmel escreveu:
If anyone has other things to add, please do.
Maybe it is worth to think about a Qt library which really only
provides essential stuff.
Please note any discussion about further splitting
On 13.05.2014 00:14, Ian Monroe wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Peter Kümmel syntheti...@gmx.net wrote:
On 12.05.2014 23:29, Daniel Bowen wrote:
If anyone has other things to add, please do.
Maybe it is worth to think about a Qt library which really only
provides essential stuff.
Thanks again for the info.
Here's where I've gotten to so far.
Starting from the last ./configure command line I mentioned, plus
-no-feature- for every qfeature.txt item (minus LIBRARY, SETTINGS and
REGULAREXPRESSION, since it doesn't build without those), I was at 4.3 MB
stripped.
Added to the
+qtmailinglist1=bowensite@qt-project.org] On
Behalf Of Peter Kümmel
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 2:48 AM
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] Size of libQt5Core in 5.3
On 11.05.2014 09:20, Daniel Bowen wrote:
I have an embedded environment where we usenon-UI parts of Qt (Qt Core, Qt
Em seg 12 maio 2014, às 15:29:29, Daniel Bowen escreveu:
qconfig is nice to separate out those -no-feature- items into another file -
thanks! ./configure -help still lists -qconfig, so hopefully that's a good
sign that it will stay around, even if the Qt5 documentation doesn't
mention it.
It
Em seg 12 maio 2014, às 23:55:27, Peter Kümmel escreveu:
If anyone has other things to add, please do.
Maybe it is worth to think about a Qt library which really only
provides essential stuff.
Please note any discussion about further splitting QtCore is a Qt 6
discussion.
--
Thiago
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Peter Kümmel syntheti...@gmx.net wrote:
On 12.05.2014 23:29, Daniel Bowen wrote:
If anyone has other things to add, please do.
Maybe it is worth to think about a Qt library which really only
provides essential stuff. What would such a library contain,
when
Em seg 12 maio 2014, às 15:14:51, Ian Monroe escreveu:
Unlike the Linux networking maintainers, Thiago is open to
configure-time methods to slim down QtCore. That seems like the way
forward for people who care about such things.
To be clear: I will not accept patches that unreasonably clutter
I have an embedded environment where we use non-UI parts of Qt (Qt Core, Qt
Networking) on an ARM host processor.
We've been using 4.8.4 for a little while. There's some other changes coming
to this code, and we've been looking to move to 5.x with the upcoming 5.3.
After working through several
Il 11/05/2014 09:20, Daniel Bowen ha scritto:
So I started putting in -skip, -no-feature, etc.having features wewould
still use, but other things stripped out.I also had a mkspec use -Os to
optimize for size.Usingsomething likethis:
[snip]
Please note that several of those features don't even
On 11 May 2014 08:20, Daniel Bowen qtmailingli...@bowensite.com wrote:
Is there any way to get Qt Core to compile smaller, like under 3MB? Am I
missing anything to skip or “-no-xyz” or “-nomake” or “-no-feature”? Why is
libQt5Core.so.5.3.0 so much bigger than libQtCore4.so.4.8.4?
I'll leave
12 matches
Mail list logo
