On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 at 06:28, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Interest <
interest@qt-project.org> wrote:
> Extract the RPM, and there it is, in all of its glory, a KeepAlive Off
> by default in Apache's master configuration file:
>
> > $ grep -nr KeepAlive .
> > ./etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf:73:# KeepAlive: Wh
Hi,
On 26/07/18 17:01, Sze Howe Koh wrote:
To clarify: Did the server respond to your GET with "Connection:
keep-alive" instead of "Connection: close", when you downloaded a
metadata file (*meta.7z)?
I sent requests from 3 different programs with different user-agents
(plus 1 request from a VM)
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 at 09:24, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 17:59:07 PDT Sze Howe Koh wrote:
> > I think the comms was HTTP 1.1, because Wireshark showed "HTTP/1.1 200
> > OK(text/plain)"
>
> Ok, so the server chose to close the connection.
>
> It did not happen for me
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 17:59:07 PDT Sze Howe Koh wrote:
> I think the comms was HTTP 1.1, because Wireshark showed "HTTP/1.1 200
> OK(text/plain)"
Ok, so the server chose to close the connection.
It did not happen for me when using curl, also with download.qt.io. Possible
reasons:
1) di
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 at 08:57, Sze Howe Koh wrote:
>
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 at 05:44, Thiago Macieira
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 10:22:19 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 07:52:13 PDT Marian Beermann wrote:
> > > > Correct. If you augment your debugging
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 at 05:44, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 10:22:19 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 07:52:13 PDT Marian Beermann wrote:
> > > Correct. If you augment your debugging a little, it is easy to see the
> > > server sending a "Connection
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 10:22:19 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 07:52:13 PDT Marian Beermann wrote:
> > Correct. If you augment your debugging a little, it is easy to see the
> > server sending a "Connection: close" header:
> >
> > qDebug() << ... << reply->rawHeader("C
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 07:52:13 PDT Marian Beermann wrote:
> Correct. If you augment your debugging a little, it is easy to see the
> server sending a "Connection: close" header:
>
> qDebug() << ... << reply->rawHeader("Connection");
The question is whether the request had a "Connection: keep
Correct. If you augment your debugging a little, it is easy to see the
server sending a "Connection: close" header:
qDebug() << ... << reply->rawHeader("Connection");
On 25.07.2018 16:38, Sze Howe Koh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Revisiting this topic after a hiatus. Thanks for confirming, Thiago and
>
Hi all,
Revisiting this topic after a hiatus. Thanks for confirming, Thiago and Hamish.
On 13 April 2018 at 10:08, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 12 de abril de 2018 15:44:54 PDT Sze Howe Koh wrote:
>> Can QNAM re-use a TCP connection for multiple HTTP requests?
>
> Yes. It's the defa
On quinta-feira, 12 de abril de 2018 15:44:54 PDT Sze Howe Koh wrote:
> Can QNAM re-use a TCP connection for multiple HTTP requests?
Yes. It's the default. You don't have to do anything to enable it.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Tec
On 13/04/18 10:22, Jason H wrote:
I thought so, but that makes me wonder even more given the recent discussion:
why does the maintenance tool not use them?
You have to keep a single QNetworkAccessManager and make each new
request from that. I haven't checked the code though.
I did check tha
nterest] Does QNetworkAccessManager support HTTP persistent
> connections? (keep-alive)
>
> On 13/04/18 10:03, Jason H wrote:
> > Http/s 1.1 with keep-alive should work too.
> > Make sure you're setting the right headers.
>
On 13/04/18 10:03, Jason H wrote:
Http/s 1.1 with keep-alive should work too.
Make sure you're setting the right headers.
QNAM will do that for you automatically.
Hamish
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/
Http/s 1.1 with keep-alive should work too.
Make sure you're setting the right headers.
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 7:24 PM
> From: "Hamish Moffatt"
> To: interest@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Interest] Does QNetworkAccessManager support HTTP persistent
On 13/04/18 08:44, Sze Howe Koh wrote:
Can QNAM re-use a TCP connection for multiple HTTP requests?
AFAICT, it always does, if you reuse the QNAM.
Even better if you can use HTTP/2 (needs Qt 5.10.1 or later to actually
work), where multiple logical connections can be made over the same TCP
c
Can QNAM re-use a TCP connection for multiple HTTP requests?
This feature would be very helpful for
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTIFW-1130
Regards,
Sze-Howe
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listi
17 matches
Mail list logo
