Re: [Interest] License regarding question

Hello, Thanks to all for the answers. Actually, we did not fix the problem. All we did - recompiled Qt w/ OpenSSL library to avoid the problem on Mac OS X. This helped. Later, one of your programmers reported that he fixed the problem. But we did not test it yet. On 11/29/2016 5:00 PM,

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 17:51:28 PST Jake Petroules wrote: > See, this is why we need to make submissions on JIRA require signing the > CLA. People simply don't want to go through the Gerrit hassle for drive-by > contributions. I'm not sure we should accept drive-by contributions

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

> > On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 09:00:21 PST Andy wrote: > >> So I would suggest reporting the bug at https://bugreports.qt.io and > >> attaching the fixes - then at least it exists somewhere and can be > >> found/looked at/integrated by someone in the future. > > > > We cannot accept

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

> On Nov 29, 2016, at 9:27 AM, Thiago Macieira > wrote: > > On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 09:00:21 PST Andy wrote: >> So I would suggest reporting the bug at https://bugreports.qt.io and >> attaching the fixes - then at least it exists somewhere and can be

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 09:00:21 PST Andy wrote: > So I would suggest reporting the bug at https://bugreports.qt.io and > attaching the fixes - then at least it exists somewhere and can be > found/looked at/integrated by someone in the future. We cannot accept patches on the

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 13:42:39 PST Alexander Dyagilev wrote: > Hello, > > We use Qt under LGPL license. > > We have found some problem in it (bug working with HTTPS on limited > connection speed) and fixed it. We have recompiled Qt then. > > What do we must to do next to obey

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

29.11.2016, 17:00, "Andy" : > Back to Alexander's question... > > Should he choose to contribute the fixes back, signing up for, setting up, > and working with gerritt is a PIA if you aren't using it frequently. Doing initial setup is really easy if you follow instruction.

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

Back to Alexander's question... Should he choose to contribute the fixes back, signing up for, setting up, and working with gerritt is a PIA if you aren't using it frequently. So I would suggest reporting the bug at https://bugreports.qt.io and attaching the fixes - then at least it exists

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

29.11.2016, 14:57, "André Somers" : > Op 29/11/2016 om 12:01 schreef Konstantin Tokarev: >>  29.11.2016, 13:51, "André Somers" : >>>  Op 29/11/2016 om 11:42 schreef Alexander Dyagilev:    Hello,    We use Qt under LGPL license.

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

Op 29/11/2016 om 12:01 schreef Konstantin Tokarev: 29.11.2016, 13:51, "André Somers" : Op 29/11/2016 om 11:42 schreef Alexander Dyagilev: Hello, We use Qt under LGPL license. We have found some problem in it (bug working with HTTPS on limited connection

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

29.11.2016, 13:45, "Jake Petroules" : >>  On Nov 29, 2016, at 2:42 AM, Alexander Dyagilev wrote: >> >>  Hello, >> >>  We use Qt under LGPL license. >> >>  We have found some problem in it (bug working with HTTPS on limited >> connection speed) and

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

29.11.2016, 13:51, "André Somers" : > Op 29/11/2016 om 11:42 schreef Alexander Dyagilev: >>  Hello, >> >>  We use Qt under LGPL license. >> >>  We have found some problem in it (bug working with HTTPS on limited >>  connection speed) and fixed it. We have recompiled Qt

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

Op 29/11/2016 om 11:42 schreef Alexander Dyagilev: Hello, We use Qt under LGPL license. We have found some problem in it (bug working with HTTPS on limited connection speed) and fixed it. We have recompiled Qt then. What do we must to do next to obey the license terms? Publish the

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

> On 29 Nov 2016, at 10:45, Jake Petroules wrote: > > >> On Nov 29, 2016, at 2:42 AM, Alexander Dyagilev wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> We use Qt under LGPL license. >> >> We have found some problem in it (bug working with HTTPS on limited >>

Re: [Interest] License regarding question

> On Nov 29, 2016, at 2:42 AM, Alexander Dyagilev wrote: > > Hello, > > We use Qt under LGPL license. > > We have found some problem in it (bug working with HTTPS on limited > connection speed) and fixed it. We have recompiled Qt then. > > What do we must to do next to