Re: [Interest] QFileDialog is lovelier the second time around...

2013-06-18 Thread Duane
On 6/17/2013 1:07 PM, Constantin Makshin wrote: 1) On Windows directories can have custom icons. Not 100% sure about other platforms. 2) Directories have at least last modification timestamp which is needed for the detailed view mode. What approach is better -- get all information at once or

Re: [Interest] QFileDialog is lovelier the second time around...

2013-06-18 Thread André Somers
Op 17-6-2013 19:07, Constantin Makshin schreef: 1) On Windows directories can have custom icons. Not 100% sure about other platforms. 2) Directories have at least last modification timestamp which is needed for the detailed view mode. What approach is better -- get all information at once

Re: [Interest] QFileDialog is lovelier the second time around...

2013-06-18 Thread Duane
On 6/18/2013 8:41 AM, André Somers wrote: Op 17-6-2013 19:07, Constantin Makshin schreef: 1) On Windows directories can have custom icons. Not 100% sure about other platforms. 2) Directories have at least last modification timestamp which is needed for the detailed view mode. What approach

Re: [Interest] QFileDialog is lovelier the second time around...

2013-06-17 Thread Duane
On 6/14/2013 5:06 PM, Till Oliver Knoll wrote: Am 14.06.2013 um 23:02 schrieb Till Oliver Knolltill.oliver.kn...@gmail.com: That said, the Qt cross-platform file dialog is (was?) terribly slow with network mapped drives On Windows, I should add. Yes, on Windows it's very slow. I would

Re: [Interest] QFileDialog is lovelier the second time around...

2013-06-17 Thread Duane
On 6/15/2013 3:48 AM, Etienne Sandré-Chardonnal wrote: Hello, Are you sure you are not compiling in debug mode? I use QFileDialog native (static) in my application, it's very fast to load, except in debug mode (where it takes a few seconds loading all dlls). Qt 4.8.1 under windows, mingw

Re: [Interest] QFileDialog is lovelier the second time around...

2013-06-17 Thread william.croc...@analog.com
On 06/17/2013 09:57 AM, Duane wrote: On 6/14/2013 5:06 PM, Till Oliver Knoll wrote: Am 14.06.2013 um 23:02 schrieb Till Oliver Knolltill.oliver.kn...@gmail.com: That said, the Qt cross-platform file dialog is (was?) terribly slow with network mapped drives That's the price we pay for

Re: [Interest] QFileDialog is lovelier the second time around...

2013-06-17 Thread Duane
On 6/17/2013 10:09 AM, william.croc...@analog.com wrote: On 06/17/2013 09:57 AM, Duane wrote: On 6/14/2013 5:06 PM, Till Oliver Knoll wrote: Am 14.06.2013 um 23:02 schrieb Till Oliver Knolltill.oliver.kn...@gmail.com: That said, the Qt cross-platform file dialog is (was?) terribly slow

Re: [Interest] QFileDialog is lovelier the second time around...

2013-06-17 Thread Constantin Makshin
1) On Windows directories can have custom icons. Not 100% sure about other platforms. 2) Directories have at least last modification timestamp which is needed for the detailed view mode. What approach is better -- get all information at once or quickly get names, deferring timestamp retrieval

Re: [Interest] QFileDialog is lovelier the second time around...

2013-06-15 Thread Etienne Sandré-Chardonnal
Hello, Are you sure you are not compiling in debug mode? I use QFileDialog native (static) in my application, it's very fast to load, except in debug mode (where it takes a few seconds loading all dlls). Qt 4.8.1 under windows, mingw compiler Etienne 2013/6/14 Mojmír Svoboda

Re: [Interest] QFileDialog is lovelier the second time around...

2013-06-14 Thread Constantin Makshin
Try non-static QFileDialog members -- it's more likely to ignore various system [shell] extensions. On Jun 14, 2013 3:11 PM, Mojmír Svoboda mojmir.svob...@warhorsestudios.cz wrote: Hello again, I tried to use QFileDialog for classic file selection, but it feels very sluggish, expecially the

Re: [Interest] QFileDialog is lovelier the second time around...

2013-06-14 Thread Andre Somers
Op 14-6-2013 19:27, Constantin Makshin schreef: Try non-static QFileDialog members -- it's more likely to ignore various system [shell] extensions. And way less likely to look and feel anything close to what the user expects in a file dialog on his platform... At least, on windows, the Qt

Re: [Interest] QFileDialog is lovelier the second time around...

2013-06-14 Thread Constantin Makshin
There's not much choice for Mojmir -- either non-native, but [likely to be] fast, dialog or native, but with all that third-party stuff which makes things slower than they are supposed to be. :-) On Jun 14, 2013 11:01 PM, Andre Somers an...@familiesomers.nl wrote: Op 14-6-2013 19:27, Constantin

Re: [Interest] QFileDialog is lovelier the second time around...

2013-06-14 Thread Duane
On 6/14/2013 3:01 PM, Andre Somers wrote: Op 14-6-2013 19:27, Constantin Makshin schreef: Try non-static QFileDialog members -- it's more likely to ignore various system [shell] extensions. And way less likely to look and feel anything close to what the user expects in a file dialog on his

Re: [Interest] QFileDialog is lovelier the second time around...

2013-06-14 Thread Till Oliver Knoll
Am 14.06.2013 um 22:19 schrieb Duane duane.heb...@group-upc.com: On 6/14/2013 3:01 PM, Andre Somers wrote: Op 14-6-2013 19:27, Constantin Makshin schreef: Try non-static QFileDialog members -- it's more likely to ignore various system [shell] extensions. And way less likely to look and

Re: [Interest] QFileDialog is lovelier the second time around...

2013-06-14 Thread Till Oliver Knoll
Am 14.06.2013 um 23:02 schrieb Till Oliver Knoll till.oliver.kn...@gmail.com: That said, the Qt cross-platform file dialog is (was?) terribly slow with network mapped drives On Windows, I should add. Cheers, Oliver ___ Interest mailing list