On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Robert Janeczek wrote:
Windows build from the CVS as of 6:00 GMT:
http://www.php.net/~edink/php-5.0.0-Win32-prerelease-test.zip
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29025 is still present
It's set to Open, isn't it?
Derick
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Christian Stocker wrote:
Morning
After PHP 5.0.0 is now released, are there any plans for opening up HEAD
for not-only-bug-fixes again?
Do we branch (or is it already) PHP_5_0 and allow only bugfixes there
(as with 4.3) and HEAD will become 5.1 later?
Or is HEAD for
Alle 10:41, mercoledì 14 luglio 2004, Derick Rethans ha scritto:
New features should go to 5.1.x and fixes/small additions to 5.0.1...
I think one of the first 5.0.1 fixes should be about this bug:
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29132
Many applications broken due to this, I'm not the one who
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Alex Pagnoni wrote:
Alle 10:41, mercoledì 14 luglio 2004, Derick Rethans ha scritto:
New features should go to 5.1.x and fixes/small additions to 5.0.1...
I think one of the first 5.0.1 fixes should be about this bug:
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29132
We can decide
Using .dsp build, or the new build system?
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:03:17 -0700, Shane Caraveo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seems sqlite.w32.h did not get updated when sqlite was last updated, so
you cannot build a clean php5 on win32. The culprit is the
SQLITE_NOTADB define. hacking it in at
Hi,
unfourtunately the security patch for 5.0.0 was broken in one Apache1
specific part. Basic auth does not detect that username+password was given.
PHP 4.3.x is not affected because that patch did not go into it (yet).
Stefan
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To
Alle 10:51, mercoledì 14 luglio 2004, Derick Rethans ha scritto:
We can decide that for ourselves, thank you very much.
Thanks to Stefan Esser that seems just fixed this.
Alex
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Just commited what should be a fix. Please try next snapshot.
looks fine - thanks :)
rash
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi all,
sorry for asking a question that has most likely been addressed a long
time ago, but what ever happened to apache_hooks and will it be updated
for apache2?
Found some old stuff about php 4.2 and apache 1.3 and it seemed like a
nice idea... anyone know of its fate?
--
Ray Hilton
-
Developing the PHP runtime
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 14.7.2004 10:41 Uhr, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Christian Stocker wrote:
Morning
After PHP 5.0.0 is now released, are there any plans for opening up HEAD
for not-only-bug-fixes again?
Do we branch (or is it already) PHP_5_0 and allow only bugfixes there
(as with 4.3) and HEAD
On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 07:43, Christian Stocker wrote:
New features should go to 5.1.x and fixes/small additions to 5.0.1...
but there is no branch yet. I think we need to make one. What about
others?
To my knowledge it was agreed a long time ago that 5.0 would be released
and branched so we
Let me first say that I'm glad you guys allow us lurkers lurking about.
I've managed to learn a huge amount just watching the process you went
through to bring PHP5 to fruition. I can honestly say that while it's
been a ton of reading (and of course I didn't read all of it), it's been
very
You mean we haven't created a branch for 5.0 ??
Let's do it ASAP; I noticed a few changes since the release... what
happened to the release process??
Let's branch PHP_5_0 and make HEAD 5.1-dev.
--Wez.
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:41:03 +0200 (CEST), Derick Rethans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
New
I would say to wait 2 or 3 weeks.
This time is not critical for the code that is laying aside for months.
In my opinion the bug system will start to fill up with new bugs in
the next days or 2-3 weeks. Some percentage of these bugs will be
easy to fix. If the branch happens now, a bug hunter has
On Jul 14, 2004, at 6:37 AM, Ray Hilton wrote:
Hi all,
sorry for asking a question that has most likely been addressed a long
time ago, but what ever happened to apache_hooks and will it be
updated for apache2?
Found some old stuff about php 4.2 and apache 1.3 and it seemed like a
nice idea...
Hi,
Now handle member of zend_module_entry is getting populated(see php_dl
function inside the ext/standard/dl.c).
But it will not help as it should be set before calling
zend_register_module_ex.(As this function copies the whole
zend_module_entry to module_registry which is later used when trying
Hi All,
I have patches against PHP5.0.0 to make PHP5.0.0 work for NetWare.
What is the ideal way in which these changes can be merged in the CVS
HEAD?
I have small patches against 68 files.
a) Is it advisable to send all 68 patches in one single patch?
b) Is it advisable to categorize the patches
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
Hi All,
I have patches against PHP5.0.0 to make PHP5.0.0 work for NetWare.
What is the ideal way in which these changes can be merged in the CVS
HEAD?
Can you please post a link to this patch here?
regards,
Derick
--
PHP Internals - PHP
I think with the fix Stefan just commited we'll probably release 5.0.1 in
the near future, depending on how many people are bitten by it.
I suggest waiting a few more days while continuing to submit bug reports
which we'll most likely be receiving in the coming days, and then branch
off the
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, George Schlossnagle wrote:
On Jul 14, 2004, at 6:37 AM, Ray Hilton wrote:
Hi all,
sorry for asking a question that has most likely been addressed a long
time ago, but what ever happened to apache_hooks and will it be
updated for apache2?
Found some old stuff
Hi guys,
first off congrats!! 'love what you've done with the place'!
I noticed a few references to PHP4 and PHP3 in the ini files , there are
probably other places too, which you may wish to update.
no biggy but I thought I'd mention it (spit and polish - if the metaphor
means anything to
Hello Andi,
that's absolutley stupid. You cannot force people here to fix bugs they
have no idea of by just not branching. Also you ignore every little habit
we developed in the past. That does not let us look professional.
marcus
Wednesday, July 14, 2004, 6:08:15 PM, you wrote:
I think with
i`m still trying to do my first windows build. recently i stopped on
required files in 'bundle' directory. is there any way to get module
directly from cvs with this directory in it? i tried several methods (cvs
(two aliases at least :]), snaps.php.net) and never seem to get this nice
dir inside.
Is the following patch correct in addressing the security fixes from
4.3.8 for 4.3.7?
--
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-- snip snip
--- ext/wddx/wddx.c.orig2003-10-20 10:42:10.0 -0500
+++ ext/wddx/wddx.c 2004-07-14 14:26:30.978747000 -0500
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
25 matches
Mail list logo
