Yes, it could be implemented that way too, but it would require
a patch to all the different front-ends you might be using instead
of one simple patch to the backend. You might also have a front-end
that you do not have the source for, and thus cannot patch.
I consider it a worthwhile patch.
What front-end are you using? Look it's not the end of the world but you're
the first person who seems to have wanted this and I don't see dozens of
front-ends being patched to support this. I think it's quite esoteric and I
don't like seeing more and more patches, even if they don't do
Currently apache and lighttpd. Both are feasible to patch, but
I looked into adding this functionality to lighttpd, and that
would require a more complicated patch than this, so this won ;-)
As you said, it is not the end of the world. I am quite happy to
patch PHP myself when needed, but
Hi --
The attached patch contains modifications to the makerpm script for php-4.3.9
for portability, security, and bug fixes. Without the patches, the generated
spec file
would not build on a Fedora Core 2 system.
Here's a summary of the changes:
- Invoke rpmbuild instead of rpm for
As long as we are in dropping EXPERIMENTAL Mode:
Shouldn't we drop EXPERIMENTAL from php4 domxml living in PECL?
AFAIRC once Cgristian Stocker said, it is stable, obviously no API
changes will happen etc.
Any reason not to drop EXPERIMENTAL from docs and pecl source for domxml?
I apologize if I am
posting this to the wrong list I am a newbie to the lists.
I would like to add
some functions to the ftp extention. Most notably at this point I am interested
in a ftp_get_resp() that returns ftp-inbuf and perhaps the response code
from the server.Or maybe it could
Hello Rasmus,
It seems that it should be marked as a depreciated feature IN PHP5,
but not excremental in PHP4. This would let everyone know what
the real deal is...
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, December 2, 2004, 12:04:41 PM, you
Can Someone respond to this?
With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 23:56:13 -0800, Kamesh Jayachandran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi All,
I could see a leak of 60 bytes for the following script.
?php
//echo hi;
?
While investigation I found that
Hello Christian,
Thursday, December 2, 2004, 7:26:31 PM, you wrote:
It's not experimantal anymore in the sense of API changes. (Known) Bugs
are not there, the limitations are in the implementation, which was
fixed with dom in php5. I use it (domxml) a lot on my servers and
doesn't cause
Let me rephrase that. This is my first contribution to
php or any open source project for that matter, and I have no idea what the
process is. Do I need to write the code first and submit a patch to someone? Do
I need to work with someone since I assume don't have CVS write access? Is the
Agreed. I'm against applying this patch.
At 09:13 AM 12/3/2004 +0300, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
libfcgi that is used by PHP CGI SAPI uses SIGUSR1 for graceful restart.
This feature are used by some FastCGI front-ends, mod_fastcgi for example
(see notes section on
On 3.12.2004 1:08 Uhr, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Christian,
Thursday, December 2, 2004, 7:26:31 PM, you wrote:
It's not experimantal anymore in the sense of API changes. (Known) Bugs
are not there, the limitations are in the implementation, which was
fixed with dom in php5. I use it (domxml)
12 matches
Mail list logo
