[PHP-DEV] PHP 5 Bug Summary Report

2004-12-20 Thread internals
PHP 5 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net Num Status Summary (490 total including feature requests) ===[*Compile Issues]== 28103 Open During ./configure you get png error instead of iodbc 28700 Open yaz recode

Re: [PHP-DEV] ftp_get_resp ftp_get_conv functions

2004-12-20 Thread Andi Gutmans
Jesse, By the way, I would guess that reallocating memory in the area of a few K would be negligible to sending FTP commands over the network. So in this case I wouldn't worry about it too much and I agree with Wez suggestion to look at smart_str API. Andi At 04:51 PM 12/16/2004 -0500, Wez

[PHP-DEV] Why we don’t like PHP / PHP’s anti-Apache2 FUD

2004-12-20 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Via PlanetApache: - http://drbacchus.com/wordpress/index.php?p=843 - http://drbacchus.com/wordpress/index.php?p=844 Season's Greetings, Sebastian -- Sebastian Bergmann http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/ GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6867

[PHP-DEV] Please Update Your PayPal Account

2004-12-20 Thread update
Dear PayPal Customer This e-mail is the notification of recent innovations taken by PayPal to detect inactive customers and non-functioning mailboxes. The inactive customers are subject to restriction and removal in the next 1 month. Please confirm your email address and credit card

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why we don’t like PHP / PHP’s anti-Apache2 FUD

2004-12-20 Thread Nuno Lopes
Is the AddType stuff true? If yes, I can change the docs to AddHandler.. Nuno - Original Message - From: Sebastian Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 2:21 PM Subject: [PHP-DEV] Why we dont like PHP / PHPs anti-Apache2 FUD Via PlanetApache:

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why we don’t like PHP / PHP’s anti-Apache2 FUD

2004-12-20 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
Like with most of the criticisms along these lines, they don't bother actually researching why something is a certain way. There was a time when there was no AddHandler directive. Addtype was the way you did this. Since AddType works with every version of Apache I never saw a reason to

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why we don’t like PHP /

2004-12-20 Thread Lester Caine
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: Like with most of the criticisms along these lines, they don't bother actually researching why something is a certain way. There was a time when there was no AddHandler directive. Addtype was the way you did this. Since AddType works with every version of Apache I never

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why we don’t like PHP / PHP’s anti -Apache2 FUD

2004-12-20 Thread Paul Reinheimer
I would personally consider Rich Bowen an authority on the subject, and as such trust what he is saying as true. paul On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:28:09 -, Nuno Lopes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is the AddType stuff true? If yes, I can change the docs to AddHandler.. Nuno - Original

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why we don’t like PHP /

2004-12-20 Thread Derick Rethans
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Lester Caine wrote: Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: Like with most of the criticisms along these lines, they don't bother actually researching why something is a certain way. There was a time when there was no AddHandler directive. Addtype was the way you did this. Since

[PHP-DEV] [PATCH] php.ini-(recommended|dist) whitespace noise and typo fix

2004-12-20 Thread Daniel Lorch
Hi I did a `diff -u php.ini-dist php.ini-recommended` to see which settings differ. I discovered a lot of 'whitespace noise' and some typos in comments. No big deal but I'd be glad if someone could apply the patch attached to this mail. Daniel diff -ur php-4.3.10-dist/php.ini-dist

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why we don’t like PHP /

2004-12-20 Thread Dan Kalowsky
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Lester Caine wrote: The Apache2 debate is more interesting. I am just running up a nice new AMD64, with SUSE9.1 (no 9.2 disk handy), and the first thing I find - and which does not bother me at all - ONLY Apache2 in the distribution. I KNOW all the reasons for feet

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why we don’t like PHP /

2004-12-20 Thread Christian Schneider
Derick Rethans wrote: Why would we (as PHP developers) invest time in something while the current version provides us with all we need? Because more and more people want to run Apache 2 for different reasons? According to your argument PHP would only need to support one single OS and Webserver

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why we don’t like PHP /

2004-12-20 Thread Gareth Ardron
George Schlossnagle wrote: At some point you'll have to face it: Apache 2 is becoming a popular platform. It's obviously up to you at what point you'll consider this important enough to spend time on it but a reality check every so often is never a bad thing. Not to sound overly American, but

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why we don’t like PHP /

2004-12-20 Thread Christian Schneider
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: actually researching why something is a certain way. There was a time when there was no AddHandler directive. Addtype was the way you did According to the Apache documentation AddHandler appeared in Apache 1.1. I'm impressed with your memory, it's better than the memory

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why we don’t like PHP /

2004-12-20 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
;) I wrote the first Apache module version of PHP in 1995 though. -Rasmus On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Christian Schneider wrote: Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: actually researching why something is a certain way. There was a time when there was no AddHandler directive. Addtype was the way you did

Re: [PHP-DEV] Why we don’t like PHP /

2004-12-20 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Lester Caine wrote: The Apache2 debate is more interesting. I am just running up a nice new AMD64, with SUSE9.1 (no 9.2 disk handy), and the first thing I find - and which does not bother me at all - ONLY Apache2 in the distribution. I KNOW all the reasons for feet