PHP 5 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net
Num Status Summary (464 total including feature requests)
===[*Configuration Issues]
29478 Open ignore_user_abort not in php.ini
29971 Open variables_order behaviour
31867 Open
Your document is attached.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Could we maybe stop running around in circles?
Its obvious that the input filter is for sysadmins only. Its not a
developer tool, nor does it replace developer responsibilities. Since
its an admin tool it will likely only be of interest on controlled
servers. Think of them as a firewall
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 07:03:52PM -0500, Hans Zaunere wrote:
...
However, after downloading the php5-200502052330.tar.gz snapshot,
things seem broken again. My ./configure starts out like this:
./configure --with-libdir=lib64 --prefix=/usr/local/php
--with-apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs
Reading very interesting discuss I have noticed next thing. You are
replacing problem's of server administrator and programmer. For example,
this words:
But if I am going to run your application on my server, I want a way
to make sure no XSS, for example, can get through no matter how badly
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, M. Sokolewicz wrote:
#if PHP_MAJOR_VERSION == 5 PHP_MINOR_VERSION = 1
works ;-)
wouldn't
#if PHP_MAJOR_VERSION = 5 PHP_MINOR_VERSION = 1
be better in case this code would ever be used with a hypothetical PHP
version 6? ;)
No - then it wouldn't be triggered for
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 02:07:47PM +0100, M. Sokolewicz wrote:
[...]
wouldn't
#if PHP_MAJOR_VERSION = 5 PHP_MINOR_VERSION = 1
be better in case this code would ever be used with a hypothetical PHP
version 6? ;)
- tul
no, it wouldn't. it would work with 6.1, but not with 6.0
messju
--
Hello M.,
as found in SRM the correct code is:
#if (PHP_MAJOR_VERSION 5) || (PHP_MAJOR_VERSION == 5 PHP_MINOR_VERSION =
1)
regards
marcus
Monday, February 7, 2005, 2:07:47 PM, you wrote:
Derick Rethans wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, val khokhlov wrote:
is there a way to find out
However, after downloading the php5-200502052330.tar.gz snapshot,
things seem broken again. My ./configure starts out like this:
./configure --with-libdir=lib64 --prefix=/usr/local/php --with-
apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs
.
Which had worked fine before. However, when
I don't think Rasmus needs my permission...
--Wez.
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 10:22:12 +0100, Lukas Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since now we dont need to talk about this in
internals but instead we can just go to Wez and ask him if its welcome
in PECL or not.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 10:09:29AM -0500, Hans Zaunere wrote:
However, after downloading the php5-200502052330.tar.gz snapshot,
things seem broken again. My ./configure starts out like this:
./configure --with-libdir=lib64 --prefix=/usr/local/php --with-
However, after downloading the php5-200502052330.tar.gz snapshot,
things seem broken again. My ./configure starts out like this:
./configure --with-libdir=lib64 --prefix=/usr/local/php --with-
apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs
.
Which had worked fine before.
From: Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TSNo, you don't have to go that far. For starters, one could allow
function
TS(and possibly operator) overloading, based on type hints. The
following is
TSlegal PHP5:
That will already open the can of worms. And make each function call to go
I understood that round() is using the so called Bankers' round algorithm.
But I notice it's inconsistent. The banker's algorithm is magically
activated only for numbers beyond 2047.0. Before 2047, the classic
5-is-rounded-up method is used.
5 is rounded up for:
round(9.005, 2) gives 9.01
What was the result of this discussion?
Thanks
On 27 Oct 2004, at 12:50, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 10:53 AM 10/27/2004 +0200, Christian Schneider wrote:
Marcus Boerger wrote:
So for now the only addition we may probably consider for 5.1 is
adding 4: optional typehinted values that default to null and
I understood that round() is using the so called Bankers' round algorithm.
But I notice it's inconsistent. The banker's algorithm is magically
activated only for numbers beyond 2047.0. Before 2047, the classic
5-is-rounded-up method is used.
Floating point numbers are imprecise.
(I don't mind this discussion, but as several have asked for this subthread
on overloading be ended, it may be best to do so)
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 19:58, Terje Slettebø wrote:
From: Stig S. Bakken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh, and the comment about Code should be readable, not cuddly-cute:
I just did a long test from 1 - 1 and I noticed that every time the
number was increased with one bit (starting with 2048, then 4096, then 8192)
behaviour changes. You were right, my bad.
Makes me wonder though, what's the point of a bankers' algorithm if .005 can
never be reached, only
Attention: you have posted C++ template code on PHP mailing list. Please
pay a $100 fine immediately and carefully proceed to the exit.
-Andrei
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005, Terje Slettebø wrote:
To illustrate its use, I can give a simple example in C++:
#include iostream
class plus
{
public:
Andrei Zmievski wrote:
Attention: you have posted C++ template code on PHP mailing list. Please
pay a $100 fine immediately and carefully proceed to the exit.
Luckily my peril sensitive sunglasses turned black at the first line
before I even managed to read the template part of the code :-)
To
From: Andrei Zmievski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Attention: you have posted C++ template code on PHP mailing list. Please
pay a $100 fine immediately and carefully proceed to the exit.
Hehe... I do hope this is a joke (it would seem rather closed-minded,
otherwise). I don't think anybody would have
Hello Christian,
Monday, February 7, 2005, 11:59:04 PM, you wrote:
Andrei Zmievski wrote:
Attention: you have posted C++ template code on PHP mailing list. Please
pay a $100 fine immediately and carefully proceed to the exit.
Luckily my peril sensitive sunglasses turned black at the first
I think that's OK. Would you deal with having the docs merged into the PHP
Manual?
If no one objects then we can go ahead and do it.
Anyone know if this is done via the modules file or if it requires other
CVS magic?
Andi
At 04:28 PM 2/7/2005 +0100, Christian Stocker wrote:
Hi
As briefly
Yeah, unless someone objects that'd be great.
Thanks,
Andi
At 08:37 PM 2/7/2005 -0500, Wez Furlong wrote:
This is usually done by symlinking in the repository; I can do this if you
like.
--Wez.
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 17:16:00 -0800, Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If no one objects then we
This is usually done by symlinking in the repository; I can do this if you like.
--Wez.
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 17:16:00 -0800, Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If no one objects then we can go ahead and do it.
Anyone know if this is done via the modules file or if it requires other
CVS
Done (can be easily backed out if somone finds a good reason).
--Wez.
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 17:48:27 -0800, Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, unless someone objects that'd be great.
Thanks,
Andi
At 08:37 PM 2/7/2005 -0500, Wez Furlong wrote:
This is usually done by symlinking
A number of things on here we should pick up. The broken libtool is at
the top of my list. Of course, there are a few crazy things on there
too like building all SAPIs with ZTS.
php4 (4:4.3.10-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* Update to CVS, as of 200502060530 (closes: #288672)
- File
From: Andrei Zmievski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Attention: you have posted C++ template code on PHP mailing list.
Please
pay a $100 fine immediately and carefully proceed to the exit.
Hehe... I do hope this is a joke (it would seem rather closed-minded,
otherwise). I don't think anybody would have
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
Hehe... I do hope this is a joke (it would seem rather
closed-minded, otherwise). I don't think anybody would have
bothered if anyone posted PHP code on
e.g. comp.lang.c++(.moderated), in order to illustrate a
point. That would be stupid.
29 matches
Mail list logo
