Marcus Boerger wrote:
> Hello internals,
>
> i'd like to add two array functions:
>
> - bool array_has_more(array $array)
I don't like "array_has_more"
array_at_end()
would work better for me since the function that makes it evaluate as
true is:
end($array);
Greg
P.S. sorry if this double
Marcus Boerger wrote:
> Hello internals,
>
> i'd like to add two array functions:
>
> - bool array_has_more(array $array)
I don't like "array_has_more"
array_at_end()
would work better for me since the function that makes it evaluate as
true is:
end($array);
Greg
--
PHP Internals - PHP R
Matthew C. Kavanagh wrote:
Pierre wrote:
On 5/27/06, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- bool array(array $array)
cehcks whether arra position is valid (e.g. like "key($array) !==
NULL")
I don't understand this one.
I think you have to listen to psychedelic music and take a
Thanks Xuefer...
This bug's been extant for a long time, and I only found out why when I
spent two days/nights trying to track down its history and mechanics.
It's a pig.
- Steph
- Original Message -
From: "Xuefer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Steph Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "intern
i can confirm this on other extension.
something like this
grep free_id */*.c -B1 -A3
mbstring/mbstring.c-#ifdef ZTS
mbstring/mbstring.c:ts_free_id(mbstring_globals_id);
mbstring/mbstring.c-#else
mbstring/mbstring.c-_php_mb_globals_dtor(&mbstring_globals TSRMLS_CC);
mbstring/mbstring.c-#en
On Sat, 27 May 2006 23:52:41 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marcus Boerger) wrote:
> Hello Matthew,
>
> Saturday, May 27, 2006, 11:36:16 PM, you wrote:
>
> > Pierre wrote:
> >> On 5/27/06, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> - bool array(array $array)
> >>>
> >>> cehcks whether arra posi
Hello Andi,
i for one think it might be a solution to at least lower the pain of
version differences. Which is the reason why i liked the proposal from
the beginning and took mentorship.
best regards
marcus
Sunday, May 28, 2006, 2:39:21 AM, you wrote:
> I think a preprocessor is one of the wo
I think a preprocessor is one of the worst things that can ever happen to PHP.
It can be done as a Summer of Code project for academic reasons but I
would never be in favor of adding it to PHP. I think there's very
little use in a language like PHP and it will lead to the same
maintenance/debug
Hello Todd,
code like this is actually exactly what i mean. It is completley broken
design, maybe not for you of course. But according to any oo guideline.
But that's a different story. The real problem is that this behavior is
based on or worked around some behavior in the engine that is sooner
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 11:56:06AM -0700, Todd Ruth wrote:
> class TheParent {
> public $x = 3;
> }
> class UglyUncle {
> function f() {
> $this->x = 5;
> }
> }
> class Child extends TheParent {
> function f() {
> UglyUncle::f();
> }
> }
> $c = new Child();
> v
Hello Jared,
UPS i see my failure in writing. I meant array_valid($array) of course :-)
i have always been better in writing patches then telling tales.
best regards
marcus
>> - bool array(array $array)
>>
>> cehcks whether arra position is valid (e.g. like
>> "key($array) !== NULL")
>
Hello Matthew,
Saturday, May 27, 2006, 11:36:16 PM, you wrote:
> Pierre wrote:
>> On 5/27/06, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> - bool array(array $array)
>>>
>>> cehcks whether arra position is valid (e.g. like "key($array) !==
>>> NULL")
>>
>> I don't understand this one.
>>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Boerger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 27 May 2006 22:28
> To: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] RFC array functions
>
> Hello internals,
>
> i'd like to add two array functions:
>
> - bool array_has_more(array $array)
>
> checks
Pierre wrote:
On 5/27/06, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- bool array(array $array)
cehcks whether arra position is valid (e.g. like "key($array) !==
NULL")
I don't understand this one.
I think he meant valid() or array_valid().
--
Michael
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime D
Pierre wrote:
On 5/27/06, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- bool array(array $array)
cehcks whether arra position is valid (e.g. like "key($array) !==
NULL")
I don't understand this one.
I think you have to listen to psychedelic music and take a hit of LSD first.
--
PHP Inter
On 5/27/06, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello internals,
i'd like to add two array functions:
- bool array_has_more(array $array)
checks whether $array has more elements after current position or
if array is at last position, preferable working inside foreach
a big +1 :)
Hello internals,
i'd like to add two array functions:
- bool array_has_more(array $array)
checks whether $array has more elements after current position or
if array is at last position, preferable working inside foreach
- bool array(array $array)
cehcks whether arra position is valid (
Hello Andi, Zeev, Ilia,
the attached patch adds three new functions that make calling
functions a lot easier - at least for me in SPL. And it also does
a few things correct which are probably overseen easily. The
addition works in HEAD already and paases all memcheck tests idid
so far.
Best reg
Under CLI ZTS build, when loading a PHP-GTK 2 .dll built against anything
this side of PHP 5.1.2 release, I'm seeing an 'access violation' crash on
reaching:
if (resource_types_table && !resource_types_table[j].done &&
resource_types_table[j].dtor) {
resource_types_table[j].dtor
Hello Pierre,
everything will be only. At least on code.google.com in a bit if you don't
let me continue to do th eadminstration part...
Saturday, May 27, 2006, 6:01:11 PM, you wrote:
> On 5/27/06, Wez Furlong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The whole point of the mentor is to streamline the pro
On 5/27/06, Wez Furlong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The mentors have already volunteered their time to guide the SoC folks
through the process; we should back them up and let them get on with
it; there is little point in wasting our collective time in bickering
over the fine print.
Excuse me to
The mentors have already volunteered their time to guide the SoC folks
through the process; we should back them up and let them get on with
it; there is little point in wasting our collective time in bickering
over the fine print.
--Wez
On 5/27/06, Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/27/06,
On 5/27/06, Wez Furlong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The whole point of the mentor is to streamline the process of getting
new blood into a project; I see no reason to make it more difficult by
being too rigid.
It is not being rigid to ask some more transparency. We had reasons to
define these si
The whole point of the mentor is to streamline the process of getting
new blood into a project; I see no reason to make it more difficult by
being too rigid.
--Wez.
On 5/27/06, Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/27/06, Wez Furlong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course, if a upstanding memb
On 5/27/06, Wez Furlong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Of course, if a upstanding member of our community can vouch for
someone then we have no problem with opening up an account. This is
precisely what the mentor is doing here.
I've opened up PECL and CVS accounts for Pavlo, but granted no karma y
Hello Wez,
thanks a lot. Special access has to be discussed separately of course
as with any body else.
best regards
marcus
Saturday, May 27, 2006, 5:39:59 PM, you wrote:
> Of course, if a upstanding member of our community can vouch for
> someone then we have no problem with opening up an ac
Of course, if a upstanding member of our community can vouch for
someone then we have no problem with opening up an account. This is
precisely what the mentor is doing here.
I've opened up PECL and CVS accounts for Pavlo, but granted no karma yet.
Marcus (and other mentors): where CVS access is
On 27.05.2006 19:16, Pierre wrote:
On 5/27/06, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Pierre,
you don't mind if the Mentors take care of their students do you?
Let me rephrase. SoC or not, Mr. Boerger or not, it does not matter.
The base principle to get a PECL/PEAR/PHP.net accoun
On 5/27/06, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Pierre,
you don't mind if the Mentors take care of their students do you?
Let me rephrase. SoC or not, Mr. Boerger or not, it does not matter.
The base principle to get a PECL/PEAR/PHP.net account and cvs access is to:
- Introduce
Hello Pierre,
you don't mind if the Mentors take care of their students do you?
Saturday, May 27, 2006, 5:12:00 PM, you wrote:
> On 5/27/06, Pavlo Shelyazhenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> To develop the Summer of Code project - PHP Macro Preprocessor
> Once there is some code to see, we wil
On 5/27/06, Pavlo Shelyazhenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To develop the Summer of Code project - PHP Macro Preprocessor
Once there is some code to see, we will create your accounts and give
you CVS access. Also we should name your project before the first
commit.
--Pierre
--
PHP Internals -
To develop the Summer of Code project - PHP Macro Preprocessor
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello guys,
just a short notice from google. There is a rule that disallows students
from working together. I didn't remember having seen it or heared of it on
the administrators list but if google Chris or Greg from Google say so we
can only respect that rule. In fact Chris said that the work o
33 matches
Mail list logo
