Hi!
If the namespace-approach only covers classes it is implemented
half-heartedly, IMO. I see a lot of classes that are just really
collections of static functions, that's what namespaces should cover,
too. And disallowing constants only so that : works is a bad tradeoff...
Regards,
Stefan
--
Hello Jessie,
we already have consts in our classes, if you look close then you will see
that the table does not conatain 'namespace:const' but only 'namespace:class'
and still there are conflicts already.
best regards
marcus
Sunday, November 12, 2006, 1:48:22 AM, you wrote:
Hi Marcus,
As
Will there be an upcoming release (I don't mean ever, but soon) that
incorporates this fix:
http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/php-src/ext/standard/html.c?r1=1.63.2.23.2.2r2=1.63.2.23.2.3view=patch
I do my own compilation, but I see that vendors have been pushing out
their own versions lately...
-s
Mike, please make sure you didn't forget to do `cvs up Zend` and `./cvsclean`
to get a clean build.
I can't reproduce it with your test case, though.
On 11/11/2006 11:57 PM, Michael Wallner wrote:
Hi,
There's a problem with the memory manager (HEAD):
[EMAIL
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, steve wrote:
Will there be an upcoming release (I don't mean ever, but soon) that
incorporates this fix:
http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/php-src/ext/standard/html.c?r1=1.63.2.23.2.2r2=1.63.2.23.2.3view=patch
I do my own compilation, but I see that vendors have been
