Hi,
I would like to propose Support for Mutation Testing in PHPUnit [1] as
an idea for this year's Google Summer of Code.
I doubt that the PHPUnit project itself could take part as a mentoring
organization. This is why I hope to get this project idea in under the
umbrella of the PHP
Ah cool!
If you could post your update or updates (as the case may be) as a tarball,
.txt file or download link on this list 'twould be good. If you have the
time and energy to maintain ext/ldap, 'twould be even better, but if that's
not an option I can at least check that your changes
I think that's a good idea. I would say you should go ahead and add the idea
to our SoC page (http://php.net/ideas.php).
BTW, we should start gathering ideas because the summer is not far away.
Nuno
- Original Message -
From: Sebastian Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Hi Sebastian all
On 2/25/07, Sebastian Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose Support for Mutation Testing in PHPUnit [1] as
an idea for this year's Google Summer of Code.
I doubt that the PHPUnit project itself could take part as a mentoring
organization. This is
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
I am not really a politics fan, but if we are going to list project
not under the php.net umbrella (PHPUnit isn't a php.net project
anymore, is it?) don't we then have to list _all_ PHP related project
ideas?
I understand and will remove the idea in question if you
On 2/25/07, Sebastian Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
I am not really a politics fan, but if we are going to list project
not under the php.net umbrella (PHPUnit isn't a php.net project
anymore, is it?) don't we then have to list _all_ PHP related project
ideas?
I
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On 2/25/07, Sebastian Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
I am not really a politics fan, but if we are going to list project
not under the php.net umbrella (PHPUnit isn't a php.net project
anymore, is it?) don't we then have to list _all_ PHP
Hi,
I have been compiling 5.2.1 and comparing it with 5.2.0. The
development box I am using is a Xeon 3.4 GHz with 4 cores (not sure if
its 2xdual core or what, but not relevant here). I am compiling using
-O2 -march=i686 -msse2.
When running bench.php
On 02/26/2007 01:06 AM, Andrew Hutchings wrote:
Hi,
I have been compiling 5.2.1 and comparing it with 5.2.0. The
development box I am using is a Xeon 3.4 GHz with 4 cores (not sure if
its 2xdual core or what, but not relevant here). I am compiling using
-O2 -march=i686 -msse2.
When running
Antony Dovgal wrote:
I guess you were using different configure options, but I don't know,
you didn't say anything about that..
Personally I can't see any difference between 5.2.0 (14.4 +- 0.1) and
5.2.1 (14.4 +- 0.1) on my laptop.
Apologies, I'm using the same configure options for both
On 02/26/2007 01:58 AM, Andrew Hutchings wrote:
Antony Dovgal wrote:
I guess you were using different configure options, but I don't know,
you didn't say anything about that..
Personally I can't see any difference between 5.2.0 (14.4 +- 0.1) and
5.2.1 (14.4 +- 0.1) on my laptop.
Apologies,
Antony Dovgal wrote:
Please remove all these options and try with just ./configure
--disable-all.
Will do in the morning and report back. I will also try an un-optimised
standard i386 build of each as see what happens.
If it is any help (forgot to mention before) I am using gcc 4.1.0 and
the
On 02/26/2007 02:26 AM, Andrew Hutchings wrote:
Antony Dovgal wrote:
Please remove all these options and try with just ./configure
--disable-all.
Will do in the morning and report back. I will also try an un-optimised
standard i386 build of each as see what happens.
Thanks in advance.
Btw,
Antony Dovgal wrote:
Thanks in advance.
Btw, I would appreciate if you also try 5.2.2-dev snapshot, just to see
if it makes any difference.
Up very late with my youngest son being sick so just compiled the
snapshot made about 40 minutes ago with the same options, here are the
results:
simple
Antony Dovgal wrote:
I believe updating GCC to the latest version (4.1.2) might also help,
GCC 4.1.x is known to be extremely picky in some cases.
I didn't feel like overhauling GCC just this minute so instead I used
GCC 3.4.6 that is also in this box with just the -O2 and -march=i386
flags and
On 02/26/2007 05:12 AM, Andrew Hutchings wrote:
Antony Dovgal wrote:
Thanks in advance.
Btw, I would appreciate if you also try 5.2.2-dev snapshot, just to see
if it makes any difference.
Up very late with my youngest son being sick so just compiled the
snapshot made about 40 minutes ago with
16 matches
Mail list logo
