The first is cleared before the second is instantiated.
Oh, that clears everything, please ignore my previous post. Still,
don't you think this is a bit misleading? IMHO, new object should
always have the unique id(or hash in terms of spl)...
That's a valid point, reusing IDs might be not a go
Not quite. It creates a hash of an object, so two objects with the same
data yield the same hashes:
var_dump(spl_object_hash(new stdClass()), spl_object_hash(new stdClass()));
here's the code of spl_object_hash:
len = spprintf(&hash, 0, "%p:%d", Z_OBJ_HT_P(obj), Z_OBJ_HANDLE_P(obj));
I take it that when I include or conditionally include, the included
file has its own namespace, if one is declared in that file. What if I
do not declare a namespace in an include file? Does this file "inherit"
the current namespace or are the contents added to the global namespace?
No, namespa
Does this mean that a project like Phorum could declare the same
namespace at the top of all of our files and all the code in those files
would exist in the same namespace?
Theoretically, yes, that's the idea. Practically there could be some
problems with variable names - right now the patch d
Dmitry,
From your explanation it sounds like there should be any issues with
putting this patch into the next 5.2.X release.
On 4-Jul-07, at 2:31 AM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
The core_globals structure is allocated/initialized in PHP itself
(main.c).
No one extension does it.
Thanks. Dmitry
> > It is possible to use the same namespace in several PHP files.
>
> Does this mean that a project like Phorum could declare the same
> namespace at the top of all of our files and all the code in
> those files
> would exist in the same namespace?
Exactly.
> common.php:
> namespace Phorum
Hi Dmitry,
it would be great to have namespaces in PHP6, as these always
longer-getting classnames are somewhat annoying.
I don't want to start a discussion about the separator (I think there
was one before), but:
> > 6) Calls to qualified functions are resolved at run-time. Call to
> > "A::B::f
It is possible to use the same namespace in several PHP files.
Does this mean that a project like Phorum could declare the same
namespace at the top of all of our files and all the code in those files
would exist in the same namespace?
common.php:
list.php:
Or, would list.php have to im
On 04.07.2007 17:24, David Coallier wrote:
On 7/4/07, Antony Dovgal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 02.07.2007 16:42, Andrey A. Belashkov wrote:
> On 02 Jul 2007 at 12:06:08, Antony Dovgal wrote:
>> On 30.06.2007 09:54, Andrey A. Belashkov wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>> Can you add please CURLOPT_PRIVATE a
On 7/4/07, Antony Dovgal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 02.07.2007 16:42, Andrey A. Belashkov wrote:
> On 02 Jul 2007 at 12:06:08, Antony Dovgal wrote:
>> On 30.06.2007 09:54, Andrey A. Belashkov wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>> Can you add please CURLOPT_PRIVATE and CURLINFO_PRIVATE text parameters
>>> to c
On 02.07.2007 16:42, Andrey A. Belashkov wrote:
On 02 Jul 2007 at 12:06:08, Antony Dovgal wrote:
On 30.06.2007 09:54, Andrey A. Belashkov wrote:
Hello!
Can you add please CURLOPT_PRIVATE and CURLINFO_PRIVATE text parameters
to curl extension for php like CURLOPT_URL ?
In which cURL version we
Are you sure this part of the patch is correct?
if (st == SNMP_CMD_GET) {
if ((pdu =
snmp_fix_pdu(response, SNMP_MSG_GET)) != NULL) {
+ snmp_free_pdu(res
Hi,
Please review the following concept and patch for php6...
http://dev.daylessday.org/diff/ns-06.diff.txt
http://dev.daylessday.org/diff/tests.tar.gz
Main assumption of the model is that the problem that we are to solve is the
problem of the very long class names in PHP libraries. We would not
Oh, that clears everything, please ignore my previous post. Still,
don't you think this is a bit misleading? IMHO, new object should
always have the unique id(or hash in terms of spl)...
I don't like it either;) But it does exactly what Stanislav Malyshev
described: it hashes the "tuple of C po
The first is cleared before the second is instantiated.
Oh, that clears everything, please ignore my previous post. Still,
don't you think this is a bit misleading? IMHO, new object should
always have the unique id(or hash in terms of spl)...
--
Best regards, Pavel
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runti
Not quite. It creates a hash of an object, so two objects with the
same data yield the same hashes:
var_dump(spl_object_hash(new stdClass()), spl_object_hash(new stdClass
()));
Folks, is this really wanted behavior? Because if so, why does the
following result in the same hash as well(PHP-5.2.1
Not quite. It creates a hash of an object, so two objects with the
same data yield the same hashes:
var_dump(spl_object_hash(new stdClass()), spl_object_hash(new
stdClass()));
I don't believe that it's data dependent. Rather in your example the
same memory-space is used for those two objects
Am 01.07.2007 um 21:18 schrieb Pavel Shevaev:
Again see mail archive for why. That said the name appears to be
the best option already.
Oh, yes, you're right spl_object_hash does its job and does it very
well, there's really no point rename it(or make an alias) into
object_get_id. I should hav
18 matches
Mail list logo
