On 08/08/07, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Larry Garfield wrote:
> > On Tuesday 07 August 2007, Lester Caine wrote:
> >> Lester Caine wrote:
> >>> Christopher Jones wrote:
> Lester Caine wrote:
> > I keep being told that the PDO drivers can be extended to include all
> >>>
Larry Garfield wrote:
On Tuesday 07 August 2007, Lester Caine wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
Christopher Jones wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
I keep being told that the PDO drivers can be extended to include all
of the things already available in the native driver, but the second
you do that they bec
On Tuesday 07 August 2007, Lester Caine wrote:
> Lester Caine wrote:
> > Christopher Jones wrote:
> >> Lester Caine wrote:
> >>> I keep being told that the PDO drivers can be extended to include all
> >>> of the things already available in the native driver, but the second
> >>> you do that they be
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 13:02 -0700, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> > David has a point here. So first of all we should move getopt
> > implementation out of CLI/CGI and into main. Could you do that
> > first Jani?
>
> Why one would need getopt outside of cgi/cli? I.e. where would these
> options co
> Why one would need getopt outside of cgi/cli? I.e. where would these
> options come from?
initially the idea was to use getopt on windows machines. After proposing
my patch which just includes the NetBSD getopt(), there was a
recommandation in php.pecl to use the php_getopt instead of the syste
David has a point here. So first of all we should move getopt
implementation out of CLI/CGI and into main. Could you do that
first Jani?
Why one would need getopt outside of cgi/cli? I.e. where would these
options come from?
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 19:13 +0300, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> Thread safe for CGI and CLI ? :)
> Or do you find the function useful outside those SAPIs?
Well David's plan is to use the implementation for PHP-level getopt()
and I can imagine doing crazy stuff, so if we can make it thread-safe in
a good
Thread safe for CGI and CLI ? :)
Or do you find the function useful outside those SAPIs?
--Jani
Johannes Schlüter kirjoitti:
David,
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 09:57 -0400, David Soria Parra wrote:
Hi internals,
so based on a discussion of php.pecl we thought about using the php_getopt
for the PH
David,
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 09:57 -0400, David Soria Parra wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> so based on a discussion of php.pecl we thought about using the php_getopt
> for the PHP_FUNCTION(getopt) instead of the system provided getopt. Here
> is the patch for that. Hopefully someone is reviewing and
Yes, I know about this. I was wondering about this thing long time
ago..just never got around doing anything about it.. :D
But let's wait for PHP 5.3 branch to get opened first.
--Jani
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 14:22 +0200, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> Hello Jani,
>
> David has a point here. So firs
Hello Jani,
David has a point here. So first of all we should move getopt
implementation out of CLI/CGI and into main. Could you do that
first Jani?
marcus
Monday, August 6, 2007, 3:57:26 PM, you wrote:
> Hi internals,
> so based on a discussion of php.pecl we thought about using the php_get
11 matches
Mail list logo