On 12.06.2008, at 16:31, Pierre Joye wrote:
- interbase
- fbsql
- sybase and sybase_ct
I think moving fbsql is quite reasonable. However interbase and sybase
I do not agree with.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To
On 11.06.2008, at 01:15, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't that the last decision we made
about it the last time this was brought up? Just undocument it.
Totally. It exists, only works with strings (right?! :) and is not
recommended. So simply make it disappear from
On Saturday 14 June 2008 15:26:20 Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 11.06.2008, at 01:15, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't that the last decision we made
about it the last time this was brought up? Just undocument it.
Totally. It exists, only works with strings (right?! :)
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12.06.2008, at 16:31, Pierre Joye wrote:
- interbase
- fbsql
- sybase and sybase_ct
I think moving fbsql is quite reasonable. However interbase and sybase I do
not agree with.
Who will maintain them? Who can
On 14.06.2008, at 16:24, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12.06.2008, at 16:31, Pierre Joye wrote:
- interbase
- fbsql
- sybase and sybase_ct
I think moving fbsql is quite reasonable. However interbase and
sybase I do
Hi Lukas,
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These extension seem widely used enough that we have to make it an effort to
support them.
If it is so widely used, why noone complains about this removal? Why
there is nobody taking care of the bugs or
Pierre Joye wrote:
Hi Lukas,
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These extension seem widely used enough that we have to make it an effort to
support them.
If it is so widely used, why noone complains about this removal? Why
there is nobody taking
Hi Pierre,
Like I said on IRC, if the ext end up being broken, but remain in core
they can get fixed and made available easily to all users. If we move
them, then this is no longer possible. We can revist this topic for
PHP6, but I do not think we should start dropping these extension in
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
- interbase
- fbsql
- sybase and sybase_ct
I think moving fbsql is quite reasonable. However interbase and
sybase I do
not agree with.
Who will maintain them? Who can we ask when there is issues (besides
the obvious ones)?
These extension seem widely used enough
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pierre Joye wrote:
Hi Lukas,
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
These extension seem widely used enough that we have to make it an effort
to
support them.
If it is so
Hi Lester,
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apart from the problems created by changes made to the interbase driver in
the 5.1 and early 5.2 cycle ( the 64 bit version of which STILL has not been
repaired :( ) the driver still works fine with modern
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:11 PM, Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
$str{} was considered a best practice for a while so as you can see via
Google Code Search it's been used quite a bit.
I take the blame for introducing it with the intention to not only
create a better
Pierre Joye wrote:
Hi Lester,
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apart from the problems created by changes made to the interbase driver in
the 5.1 and early 5.2 cycle ( the 64 bit version of which STILL has not been
repaired :( ) the driver still works
Lester, hi,
I even installed a
development build of PHP6 some time ago, but if there is going to be TWO
versions of PHP6 then to be honest I am not interested.
There haven't been for the last couple of weeks. We're just waiting for
Scott to finish with the Engine work so that we can commit
Steph Fox wrote:
As far as I'm aware there's nothing in PHP 6 that can't be supported
from PHP 5.2.1 up, but there's plenty in PHP 5.3 that a lot of
developers will like.
AND SHOULD BE BEING DEVELOPED IN PHP6 SO WE CAN AT LEAST GET A CLEAN UNICODE
STABLE SYSTEM AVAILABLE TODAY !!
--
Hi Lester,
Am Samstag, den 14.06.2008, 21:13 +0100 schrieb Lester Caine:
[...]
AND SHOULD BE BEING DEVELOPED IN PHP6 SO WE CAN AT LEAST GET A CLEAN UNICODE
STABLE SYSTEM AVAILABLE TODAY !!
Please, don't yell. KTHXBYE
cu, Lars
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter
As far as I'm aware there's nothing in PHP 6 that can't be supported from
PHP 5.2.1 up, but there's plenty in PHP 5.3 that a lot of developers will
like.
AND SHOULD BE BEING DEVELOPED IN PHP6 SO WE CAN AT LEAST GET A CLEAN
UNICODE STABLE SYSTEM AVAILABLE TODAY !!
Please don't shout,
Pierre Joye wrote:
What I'm asking you is to help me to actually have a controllable and
testable firebird drivers in PHP. I will do my best to help you to get
things fixed and to provide the best windows binaries. However, one
thing is sure, I can't do it alone. For two reasons, I'm not a
hi Lester,
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I'm asking you is to help me to actually have a controllable and
testable firebird drivers in PHP. I will do my best to help you to get
things fixed and to provide the best windows binaries. However, one
On 14.06.2008, at 22:32, Lester Caine wrote:
Pierre Joye wrote:
What I'm asking you is to help me to actually have a controllable and
testable firebird drivers in PHP. I will do my best to help you to
get
things fixed and to provide the best windows binaries. However, one
thing is sure, I
one of the classes documented on php.net, HttpRequestPool, is not entirely
documented correctly.
http://www.php.net/manual/en/class.httprequestpool.php
as you can see, it is documented as if the class were HttpMessage. who is
the correct person / list / w/e to contact w/ such information, so
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 23:16, Nathan Nobbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
one of the classes documented on php.net, HttpRequestPool, is not entirely
documented correctly.
http://www.php.net/manual/en/class.httprequestpool.php
Fixed, thanks for the heads up.
as you can see, it is documented as
On 01.06.2008, at 07:11, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
PHP 5.3 appears (to me at least) ready for release, give or take a
bit of
ironing.
I was under impression parser multibyte support wasn't yet fixed.
Was it?
Maybe we should decide if this a show stopper or not. From my
2008/6/14 Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Pierre Joye wrote:
Hi Lukas,
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
These extension seem widely used enough that we have to make it an effort
to
support them.
If it is so widely used, why noone
24 matches
Mail list logo
