Am 20.01.2009 um 18:41 schrieb Christian Seiler:
Hi,
maybe an IRC meeting is the easiest way to come to an agreement. How
about tomorrow evening 21:00 CEST in #php.closures on freenode?
Just for clarification: I assume you mean Wednesday, January 21st,
19:00
UTC (CEST == UTC+2) and thus
On 21.01.2009, at 10:04, David Zülke wrote:
Am 20.01.2009 um 18:41 schrieb Christian Seiler:
Hi,
maybe an IRC meeting is the easiest way to come to an agreement. How
about tomorrow evening 21:00 CEST in #php.closures on freenode?
Just for clarification: I assume you mean Wednesday,
Thanks,
I did propose the function because the construction in user-land is quite
expensive;
Actually tests showed: the user-land algorithm of mapping these objects
(regarding a count of thousand; up to a half million objects / iterations)
took 0,2 - 70 seconds to execute!
Therefore: I would be
Hi.
On 21.01.2009 11:44 Uhr, Kenan R Sulayman wrote:
I did propose the function because the construction in user-land is quite
expensive;
Reflection is expensive, indeed. The way we solved it for FLOW3 is to
create a ReflectionService that caches such information as long as the
source
On 21.01.2009, at 12:00, Karsten Dambekalns wrote:
Hi.
On 21.01.2009 11:44 Uhr, Kenan R Sulayman wrote:
I did propose the function because the construction in user-land is
quite
expensive;
Reflection is expensive, indeed. The way we solved it for FLOW3 is
to create a ReflectionService
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 21.01.2009, at 12:00, Karsten Dambekalns wrote:
On 21.01.2009 11:44 Uhr, Kenan R Sulayman wrote:
I did propose the function because the construction in user-land is
quite
expensive;
Reflection is expensive, indeed. The way we solved it for FLOW3 is to
create a
Christian Schneider schrieb:
Yes, please. Keep clutter out of the engine especially for stuff which
should not be used often. If you are relying on Reflection to be fast
for you everyday code then you're IMHO doing something weird and it is
ok that you have to write your own caching for it
Christian Schneider wrote:
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 21.01.2009, at 12:00, Karsten Dambekalns wrote:
On 21.01.2009 11:44 Uhr, Kenan R Sulayman wrote:
I did propose the function because the construction in user-land is
quite
expensive;
Reflection is expensive, indeed. The way we solved it
First: I'd understand, I've to build the caching system on my own;
Second: I'd vote for speeding up Reflection.
Thanks,
--
(c) Kenan Sulayman
Freelance Designer and Programmer
Life's Live Poetry
2009/1/21 Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com
Christian Schneider wrote:
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
seems to me that many of the new requests coming in, including my own
stupid ones are because people want to build fast decent orm's in php -
Having built an ORM system myself I can say that you don't need
Reflection (or even other fancy features not yet in PHP) for this.
Christian Schneider wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
seems to me that many of the new requests coming in, including my own
stupid ones are because people want to build fast decent orm's in php -
Having built an ORM system myself I can say that you don't need
Reflection (or even other fancy
On Jan 21, 2009, at 4:20 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
seems to me that many of the new requests coming in, including my own
stupid ones are because people want to build fast decent orm's in
php -
Having built an ORM system myself I can say that you don't need
My personal favorite use of Reflection is Class Factories. While this
could be done with:
?php
$className = 'Util';
$obj = new $className();
?
It seems a little blunt to me, it also doesn't support having a
variable number of arguments to the constructor. I've seen some
pretty egregious
Roman Borschel schrieb:
Would you mind sharing (off-list) how you get data in and out of the
objects **transparently**
Have a look at lp:php-object-freezer.
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/
GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6867
Especially in namespaced code it should be very useful to have
something returning fully qualified name as string. It can be
operator, but I think introducing new keyword is bad way, or it can be
realized using well known magic constant in new context:
Example:
function factory($class)
{
hi everyone,
i'm looking for a sanity check here, as i've already lost more time than
i'd like chasing ghosts on my treasure hunt through {bugs,lists,cvs}.php.net :(
afaict, CVE-2008-5658[1] is only half-fixed on 5.2.8, while it was supposed
to be fixed in 5.2.7.
while the zip library no
Hi Everybody,
It's almost that time again where we rush at the last minute to
organise something for the Google Summer of Code, so in the interest
of being prepared I'm thinking it's time to start collecting ideas for
potential students. I've updated a few of the Wiki pages with some
hi,
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:57 PM, sean finney sean...@debian.org wrote:
hi everyone,
i'm looking for a sanity check here, as i've already lost more time than
i'd like chasing ghosts on my treasure hunt through {bugs,lists,cvs}.php.net
:(
afaict, CVE-2008-5658[1] is only half-fixed on
Scott MacVicar wrote:
Hi Everybody,
It's almost that time again where we rush at the last minute to organise
something for the Google Summer of Code, so in the interest of being
prepared I'm thinking it's time to start collecting ideas for potential
students. I've updated a few of the Wiki
re,
I ran a quick test to solve this problem sooner rather than later
(using only the crash.zip part):
pie...@ubuntu:~/cvs/php53/bld$ ./sapi/cli/php ./ziptest.php
opening 'bad' zipfile...ok.
extracted.
C:\Users\pierre\Documents\php-sdk\php53\vc9\x86\php53cleanDebug\php.exe
ziptest.php
opening
Having ascertained that Lukas did not shoot himself on seeing this...
This is a testing of the waters RFC. If there is interest, it will be
followed with a patch. It should be noted that the patch for this has
been available through the various vortexes of namespace syntax for over
a year
On Wednesday 21 January 2009 2:19:53 pm Greg Beaver wrote:
[Drawbacks]
1) requires changing the engine near beta
Legitimate concern, but I happily defer t the maintainers here.
2) adds new syntax to namespaces
If I'm reading the RFC properly, it extends the existing syntax in a logical
way
hi pierre
sorry, was already asleep when you came looking for me on IRC :)
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 11:25:21PM +0100, Pierre Joye wrote:
it is fixed in 5.2.7RC2 or RC3, see:
http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/php-src/ext/zip/php_zip.c?r1=1.1.2.43r2=1.1.2.44
FSVO fixed that includes segfaulting,
Especially in namespaced code it should be very useful to have
something returning fully qualified name as string. It can be operator,
but I think introducing new keyword is bad way, or it can be realized
using well known magic constant in new context:
Example:
function factory($class)
{
24 matches
Mail list logo
