On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:55 AM, shire sh...@tekrat.com wrote:
Thanks for the feedback, and hopefully the above makes sense. I don't want
to encourage bad progarmming form and would definitely encourage avoiding
this situation if possible, however I think many applications may find this
On Feb 21, 2009, at 10:55 PM, shire wrote:
Hi Ronald,
Ronald Chmara wrote:
Wait... so if I understand this right, let's envision a code base
where,
per some random page load, 70 functions are actually called, but, oh,
7,000, or even 700,000, are being included for whatever reason?
The speed
